Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok Thank you DX will do just that . will keep you up dated.
    • dispute it with whichever cra provider is now showing it. simply state the a/c is from 2015 and was defaulted (date) and should not have re appeared. probably getting ready to sell it on. dx
    • Hi Caught Shoplifting at John Lewis - Retail loss Prevention/Other shoplifting allegations. - Consumer Action Group Thanks a lot for commenting this experience of yours. I do understand this might be something that you are not willing to talk about anymore but the same exact scenario happened with me today at John Lewis. They took my name/ address/ a picture of me holding a signed banned letter. the only questions I've got are... will I be contacted by the police will this be recorded as police caution or criminal record?  I would really really appreciate if you could let me know how it went.  I am so so so ashamed of myself and am really making changes in my life I feel like I've lost myself for a period of my life but anyways it would be really great to hear back. Thanks 
    • I thought Delinquent ment "missing payments" its active so assumimg it can be seen ? also this is the only thing change on my credit file and that in its self being re added has dropped my credit score . the debt is SB and did drop off my credit file so how have or how can they re add it again ?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capquest Going for CCJ and CO


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5101 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I got this from them today. They have previously sent me a copy of an application for a chargecard which was NOT marked as accepted and NONE of the ID tick boxes were ticked indicating that no formal ID was presented when the application was filled in. The application was in someone else's handwriting.

 

They are trying to recover a debt for a credit card but only have a charge card application to show me. As you can read on the latest letter they have sent they say it was a migration and because of this a separate CCA isn't needed for a credit card.

 

What should i do now? I've got an appointment with a solicitor through the union I'm a member of who is a specialist in CCA law next week. In the meantime should i submit an SAR to Capquest AND M&S. I'm especially keen to get hold of any formal ID that may have been used to open this account as I'm pretty sure they don't have any which is highly illiegal.

img001.jpg

img002.jpg

img003.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got the first threat in march. Sent off for the CCA and it came back about a month later. NO ID box was ticked indicating that NO formal ID was used to open the account. Also nowhere on the application was it marked as accepted. The account has been in dispute since march, and every letter i have sent them has had "ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE" on the top. They have now sent this letter with the last couple of years statements and have said that they are perfectly happy and within their rights to obtain a CCJ and then a CO on my property. They have refused to enter into anymore dispute about this matter and will press ahead to court whether i like it or not.

 

Also are they right saying that as it was a migration from a chargecard to a credit card they don't need a separate CCA?.

 

What should i do to obtain a copy of any ID that was used to open the account? And is it legal that the appropriate tick boxes were not ticked?

 

Should a send off an SAR request to Capquest and M&S asking for a copy of the ID used and any other information they hold?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to mention. They are charging me interest and fees every time they write to me. However at no time have i been informed of the interest rate being applied or a list of fees. Your guess is as good as mine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They've checked your title deeds the wafty crankers. Might be worth going to HMLR on-line to see if they placed a caution on them. Follow debt4gets advice and send the dispute letter. I may be wrong but I had thought they cannot issue proceedings while the accounts in dispute? Or am I wrong in that?

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have placed account in dispute end of...only time will tell if they take it to court..and i would say the chances of that are slim in the extreme...also in order to get a charge order they first have to win a ccj in court then you have to default on that and then and only then can they apply for a co

dont worry they are full of hot air

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have placed account in dispute end of...only time will tell if they take it to court..and i would say the chances of that are slim in the extreme...also in order to get a charge order they first have to win a ccj in court then you have to default on that and then and only then can they apply for a co

dont worry they are full of hot air

 

to get a charging order yes, you are right. What I am referring to is a caution or notice on the title to alert others to their interest; it doesn't prevent sale etc. from memory they don't need the owner's permission or a court order to place this.

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

They ignored me for a month or two and continued writing with their threats, but nothing for several months now. I don't own any property however, so that 'could' be the reason.

 

that's just what I was thinking; now they know there is a property they may have a punt

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think what I'll do is send SAR's and inform Capquest AGAIN why the account is in dispute.

And I'll see my solicitor next week too. I've spoken to him over the phone and he seems quite amused about Capquest's exploits so far.

A while ago I reported Capquest to the OFT. I got a letter informing me that they don't deal in individual cases. Today i got another letter from the OFT asking me to make a full written signed statement, as they are interested in how Capquest are dealing with me. And they asked for a copy of all correspondance from and to Capquest, this was all faxed to them today. Going to wait and see what Capquest do next and then do the statement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

are they allowed to take him to court if he has put his account into dispute? Aren't there any OFT rules 'n' regs on this?

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know you don't need court orders to place restrictions on deeds to protect vested interests. Notices simply alert parties to a dealing with land (eg a new mortgage or sale) but do nothing more; again, no court order required. I do not know if banks, DCAs etc can or do such things. Its probably a red-herring on my part. I was just concerned that they were checking up on this bloke's property and checking up on the title is very easy on-line.

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks like he wants more help

 

not for you debt4get >> for those that dont know what it means - BUMP short for "bring up my post" bring you back on the first page, so others can see it and offer help etc,

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...