Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

largo law bankruptcy petition statue barred **** WON ****


buffyoo7
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5003 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

i have recieved a bankruptcy petition from largo law it says on it failure to comply to a statutory demand for a liquidated sum payable immediately

never had any stat demand the debt is well over 6 years since paid or herd from them phoned courts and their is a hearing date sent largo law statue barred letter weeks ago and asked all info but phoned them and the said never recieved letter have proof posting recorded delivery

just seems they wont give me any info its in court 3 weeks from nowlargo 2.jpg

 

largo.jpg

Buffy x

 

Buffy v Halifax WON all charges refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

can any body help do i have to put in defence see i have nothing from courts and nothing from largo so how am i suposed to make a defence

thanks buffy

Buffy x

 

Buffy v Halifax WON all charges refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, back to basics.

 

a. The person you are dealing with is one I have had experience of through my business. Economical with the actualité and as slimy as a box of toads is my 'executive summary'. They do things like tell you on the phone they won't go ahead with a case, then do it anyway. . So record all calls or do things in writing. If you can record calls, and feel able to deal with it, you may indeed be able to trip them up...

 

b. You need to write back urgently and deny that an SD was issued. Put them to strict proof and demand details and proof of service (eg, address issued, method of service).

 

c. Copy this correspondence into the court mentioned. Call the court and ask if they have details of the SD and its issue date.

 

Hold fire on the SB bit for now. Do this and let us know what happens. Roughly how long to the hearing?

Edited by 42man
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry I didn't see this earlier.....you need all the information from the court, there should be a file there with an affadavit of how the stat demand was served (if you have never seen one)....get all this paperwork, and ask the court to copy it all (they will charge you a small amount to copy it)....you must apply a set aside of the petition this you do using form 6.19, you will need to accompany it with an affadavit and a witness statement....also there should be a name of somebody on the petition that you can contact I suggest you call them and state that you will be fighting this....you need to move quickly as your paperwork needs to be in the court 5 working days before the hearing with copies going to the opposing solicitors....

 

Once you have got ALL the paperwork from the court file....please send me a PM...

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you have never ever seen a statutory demand or have had one served on you then there must be an affadavit in the file stating that a process server had attempted personal service on you but had failed to do so, only when they had tried to effect personal service and failed will they grant allowance on substituted service (by post).....if there is no affadavit then this high court judgment will help you...you'd be surpirsed how many don't do this properly and it is likely to be an abuse of the process... -

 

Judge Boggis QC - RE AWAN - [2000] BPIR 241

Then r 6.15 says:

(1) Service of the petition should be proved by affidavit.

(2) The affidavit shall have exhibited to it -

(a) a sealed copy of the petition, and

(b) if substituted service has been ordered, a sealed copy of the order;

and it should be filed in court immediately after service.

'In my judgment, bankruptcy is one of the most serious forms of execution that can be brought against a debtor. In any bankruptcy proceedings it is, in my view, absolutely clear that the provisions as to service must be followed exactly. The rules provide in terms that the petition must be supported by an affidavit of service showing how the petition was served, and express reference is made to substituted service and the way in which that then is to be proved, which involves the affidavit of service having with it a sealed copy of the order.' - JUDGE BOGGIS QC - SITTING AS A JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone

about 2 weeks to go dont no wat to say as i said have no dates or any thing have emailed largo they wont give us any info the letter is court stamped still no papers from court tho just dont no how to go about writing to court and wat to say i know this debt is statue b it must b well over 9 years now since any payment or aknowlegement been made

thanks again for your help

buffy

Buffy x

 

Buffy v Halifax WON all charges refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi went to the court yesterday the court gave me a copy of the creditors bankruptcy petition on failure to comply with a statuory demand they would not give me a copy of the staturory demand and the affadavit i asked how the SD was served and the lady at the court said they had called at my house but got no answer so spoke to a man who lived next door who comfrimed post was received at my address then the SD was sent by 1st class post. i have got the 6.19 form to fill in but not sure what to put.

what i did notice was on the 6.7 form (the failure to comply one )it says please give the amount of debt, what they relate to and when they were incurred please show separately the amount or rate of any charge not previously notified to the debtor and the reasons you are claiming it.... they have just but the debtor is justly and truly indebted to us in the aggregate sum of £3,069.69 in respect of ............... and then nothing they have not filled it in.

on another letter from largo it says

petition debt £3069.6

court fee £190.00

service of bankruptcy petition£65.00

solicitors costs £1,755.00

total £4.824.69

also found out that patrick stone has left largo and letters are just signed largo law have tried to talk to someone at largo but they said they didnt have the paper work so could not help

thanks for looking at this Buffy x

Buffy x

 

Buffy v Halifax WON all charges refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

on the 6.9 form they have also have put their full name and address as direct line anderston house 389 arygle street but this is the address for allied international credit not direct line our they allowed to do that is that not false information

Buffy x

 

Buffy v Halifax WON all charges refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a litigant in person you are fully entitled to see the affadavit and the statutory demand......!!! the bankruptcy petition must also contain the name of a person you can talk to NOT a scrawled couple of initials....it is rule 6.2 - A statutory demand must show a named person or persons from the Creditor or their agent/solicitor whom you can contact directly. This is Rule 6.2 of The insolvency Rules 1986

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will help you on this Buffy, but you must be prepared to stand up in court and fight your corner...and of course I can't guarantee anything, my personal feeling is you seem to have a good case. And don't forget it depends on the judge on the day......let me know the deadline to submit your papers....

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi thanks for your help i am fine with going to court as long as i know what i am saying i will go back to the court in the morning and ask for copies the affadavit and the statutory demand the court date is 6th july so 2 weeks tomorrow and i will send off a s a r to largo in the morning buffy x

Buffy x

 

Buffy v Halifax WON all charges refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...