Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
    • The airline says it is investigating reports that customers can view other passengers' personal information.View the full article
    • They are finding new ways to cut back on household spending as China’s economy loses steam.View the full article
    • Sorry I meant credit fix - I really wish I'd known this before - kicking myself right now  If they come back to me asking for more money I'll cancel it and start trying to deal with the debt myself let's see what they say  Feeling tempted to cancel it now but scared that some of the debts will do more CCJ's on me and I'll have to wait 6 years again.  2 of the CCJ come of this year and then I'll only have the iva in credit file - effectively if I'd have not took out the iva in 2021 I'd have clear score by now - but then again would I because I would have been hounded the last 3 years, as bad as it is it's saves me lots of headaches whilst my debt was still within the 6 year mark.  I think most of them are near there but in all honesty no point chasing them if I do cancel iva I'd jjst wait for the ones who contact me and then start the relevant letter process on them.  Of over 6 years easy if not still possible to write off. My true victory would be having the iva wiped off my credit file as mis sold or something that way I Don't have to wait till 2027 Other option is to fight back and ask for them to offer the creditors to accept payments so far and use the following method    Will your IVA firm agree to complete your IVA on the basic of funds paid to date? The Guidance lists a lot of factors to be considered in deciding whether a settlement on the basis of funds paid to date should be proposed. You should read the list. But that may not give you any feel for whether they apply to you or not. The following are my thoughts on when an IVA should be treated as settled, not failed. They assume that you have £75 or less to pay a month: if you would currently qualify for a Debt Relief Order, then your IVA should be settled now  There is no point in making your IVA fail and you have to apply for a DRO – it will not generate another penny for your creditors. If you are renting and owe less than £50,000, check the DRO criteria now and talk to National Debtline on 0808 808 4000 about whether you qualify. You may have been told at the start of your IVA that you aren’t eligible – still check now as the DRO criteria have changed, your situation has got worse, and some people were given incorrect information about DROs at the start. if you have no assets that would be realised in bankruptcy (eg a house with equity, car worth over £2000), then your IVA should be settled now Same as (1), there is no point in making you apply for bankruptcy after your IVA fails. if your only asset is a car that is worth less than £8000, then your IVA should be settled now A car that is worth say £5000 would normally be sold in bankruptcy and you would be given a small amount to buy a cheaper car. But your creditors would not get any benefit from this as the Insolvency Service takes the first £8000 raised to cover its own costs. if you have significant assets, the closer you are to the end of the IVA, the less reasonable it is to fail it If you have been paying your IVA for 4 years, you have done your best over a long period. It isn’t your fault you can no longer continue. The fact you may have had equity to release isn’t relevant as that simply isn’t going to be possible. if your situation will clearly improve soon, then it’s unlikely your IVA will be settled I mean real improvements, not hoping that prices fall. If I can get them to accept payment to date or threaten with cancellation hopefully they may accept it -  Other option is to try and borrow money and pay make a full and final offer  Or I can just ignore and hope for the best which I'm very tempted to do especially if they respond to my review with bullying tactics despite me being skint as a fart with no mortgage as renting  It's so stressful but I've just checked the iva agreement from 2021 and it's Cabot 2 accounts Lowell about 5 accounts and then lots of repeats of the same debt with for example zopa and Cabot same amount listed twice -  also loyyds banks but I'm sure that's older than 6 years and not on credit file anyway  If I can somehow remove the iva from my credit file I'd be happy 
    • India has one of the world's fastest growing economies but the benefits are yet to fully reach the poorest.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome keep no records for a year, then deny any agreement


Saihyol
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5132 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

So without getting into much detail I lost my job and (I know I shouldn't have) basically stopped paying a number of debts for a few months. When I found a new job I contacted all my creditors and made arrangements to begin paying again.

 

My Welcome debt had been passed to their collections department which they told me was the last port of call before the debt was handed off to debt collectors. They offered to take payments at a set rate and cancel the debt once it had been reduced to a certain amount (knowing who reads these forums I am avoiding any details), but insisted on an immediate payment which the visited my house to collect. I have been paying at a higher amount every month since than they asked for in the hopes of getting this debt cleared asap.

 

I asked repeatedly for confirmation in writing of this agreement to no avail and (following the advice of Payplan) sent recorded delivery letters to all my creditors outlining the agreements we had made.

 

Fast forward a year and Welcome have called to tell me that the department that was handling my account has been closed down and that they have no records of any discussions with me for the past year (I have sent an SLA and received back records from Welcome which include nothing over the past 12 months bar my payments). I followed up on the recorded delivery and found that Welcome were apparently out when the post office tried to deliver and though a card was left informing them of the letter they have not picked up the letter from the post office since.

 

So now they are insisting that I have nearly 2 years more payments to make rather than the 6 months I expected and basically I'm wondering if there is anything I can do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan up the agreement

lets look at things for you.

 

also do some reading in this forum.

 

i think it might well open your eyes a wee bit.

 

i bet you have been fleeced for letters late payments PPI etc etc

all of which can be reclaimed.

 

it might well be an idea to SAR them.

how many loans do you think you have had with them?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I meant to say I've already completed a Subject Access Request and got the information back from them, oh and I just have the one loan.

 

Welcome Agreement

 

Note that I was told I could not have to loan without PPI which is why the 'None' is crossed out.

 

Looking through the loan statement every 'Telephone Call Fee' or 'Letter Sent Fee' is followed by a matching charge for 'Capitalisation' meaning I have in fact been charged twice on every call or letter. This debit also appears frequently for seemingly random amounts. Additionally since agreeing not to make any extra charges they have added 'Capitalisation' just after my second payment effectively wiping out that payment.

 

Also I note the addition of a 'Fee Assessment' charge (its only pennies but can't figure out what that is about nor have they discussed it with me) on a frequent basis.

 

The end result of working through the statement means for £2,000 of credit (lifted to £2,800 when I received the money due to a fee and PPI) I have paid around £3,800 so far and still have about £2,100 left on the account due to fees, charges and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

time for a reclaim then i doubt you owe them a penny!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

every unlawfully charge letter call etc & its resultant capitalisation [stealth interest] fees

PPI and any other insuranced listed.

 

you can claim 8% stat int from the day of the charge to the day of your claim .

 

on the PPI, workout how much of your PCM is PPI, then for each PCM made do the same as above. date charged to date claimed 8% stat.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just run through the numbers and for some reason they have added the amount to the debt on the capitalisation line not the fee line, the end result being I have only been charged once in each instance.

 

Given that some fees were listed in the original agreement are those actually 'unlawful'?

 

If you can advise, can I reclaim:

 

  1. The cost of the PPI
  2. The resulting interest from the PPI
  3. The Call and Letter Fees
  4. The resulting interest from these Fees

In case being able to see these helps:

Welcome Statement Page 1

Welcome Statement Page 2

Welcome Statement Page 3

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just run through the numbers and for some reason they have added the amount to the debt on the capitalisation line not the fee line, the end result being I have only been charged once in each instance.

 

Given that some fees were listed in the original agreement are those actually 'unlawful'?

 

If you can advise, can I reclaim:

 

  1. The cost of the PPI yes+8%
  2. The resulting interest from the PPI yes+8%
  3. The Call and Letter Fees yes+8%
  4. The resulting interest from these Fees yes+8%

In case being able to see these helps:

Welcome Statement Page 1

Welcome Statement Page 2

Welcome Statement Page 3

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay so I'm trying to figure out how much the PPI PCM is - I assume it's the same as the PPI % for the overall debt (so if the PPI was £100 and the debt £1000 the PPI would be 10% of the PCM amount?) In addition do I use the same calculation to reduce the interest amounts listed on my statement?

 

I'm preparing a letter to the effect that I was mis-sold the PPI and I'd like to include the charges in that, so while it's great to hear that the call and letter charges are unlawful could you let me know on what basis I will be claiming them back as they are included in the original agreement. I assume there has been some case or legislation change so it would be great to quote it.

 

On both of these are there any exclusion based on when the debt was taking out (04/07) or if I have missed payments?

 

If it turns out that the reclaim amount is more than the current balance (which looks possible) do I need to continue making payments? If not any advice on how to explain that I wont be making further payments would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...