Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Repeat private parking tickets


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5178 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, I'm a new user to the forum and currently have 2 private parking tickets on the go one from ukcps (on my 2nd letter) and one from Newlyn plc I think (waiting for my 1st letter and threw away the windscreen sticker so not sure) My question is this... Advice on these tickets seems to be never to pay because they are not enforcable and if this is true does that mean I can start parking wherever I like and just keep throwing away the tickets or will they take me to court if the tickets start mounting up? ps I have not parked anywhere on purpose where I knew I would get a ticket as yet but might start doing so.

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was a private Pay and Display car park, did you pay for the parking? That's the only question that has to be asked. Don't confuse legitimate charges for parking (i.e the sort you pay for from a machine) and the unenforceable penalties demanded by the parking companies if you break their "rules".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mate the first one was allegedly on private land at brewery wharf in leeds although there was only one sign in the vicinity and it was obstructed by a white van parked butt up against the sign (I have taken photo evidence just in case) the second one was at leeds general infimary I was loading in a loading bay and was there for 10 mins and had a site parking permit in date and displayed in my window and had permission to park from the maintenace department while I was carrying out emergency repairs to the mri scanner. I have paid 2 of these tickets in the past on site at lgi which I clained back from work but recieve these tickets quite often despite my permit hence the repeat offender question

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you can't see the signage, you can't be expected to form a contract.

 

If you have a valid permit you should just pass the matter back to the hospital. If you can't be arsed with that, just keep the permits and be ready to throw it in their faces if they are dumb enough to try court.

 

Basically if you park with permission of the landowner then the PPC can quote rules, contracts and any load of German footballer (Ballacks:D) all they like. The simple fact is you have permission to park where you did and as such the PPC are powerless.

 

I normally advocate no contact with a PPC, but if this is going to be a repeat scenario a more practical way forward may be called for - it may pay you to either make an informal approach to the on-site parking muppets and explain the facts to them. It may prevent future harassment. If you don't want to be identified then ask one of your hospital contacts to do it for you.

Edited by pin1onu

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice guys all taken on board. And don't worry I wont be giving any of these jokers the satisfaction of a reply I'll just wait for the court summons lol:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...