Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Employer witholding my items and charging for PPE


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5180 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

To cut a story short...

 

 

An employer cannot ask for money from an employee for PPE, whether it is returnable or not. This includes agency workers if they are legally regarded as your employees. If employment has been terminated and the employee keeps the PPE without the employer’s permission, then, as long as it has been made clear in the contract of employment, the employer may be able to deduct the cost of the replacement from any wages owed.

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they have a signed copy of my contract and so do I , So I am right in saying that because they dont mention that I have to repay the cost of PPE then they cant charge me for ??

 

Letter looks good thanks Elpulpo

In accordance with the contract, they could make deductions from pay they owe you for the cost of the PPE (if, of course, you hadn't returned it. Which you have). The slight distinction here is that the contract doesn't mention you paying money to them, so I can't see that they could successfully sue you.

Have you challenged them about not paying the holiday pay? It might be that they are trying to offset the cost of the PPE against that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also would the wages (holiday pay) they are witholding count as unfair deduction of wages ?

Yes, unless they can successfully argue (as I said in the previous post) that they're holding onto that to recover the cost of the PPE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This evenings update

I went there this evening to tell them I have had enough and I was there to collect my belonings and was not leaving until I had them he threatened me with tresspassing and told me to leave I said I was not prepared to go until I had my items He threatened to call police which I told him carry on as I had just spotted some of my items ! I told him after he called that all I want is to take my Personal belongings as he was witholding them. he still maintained not to have them and in his last letter states that "none of your items can be found after 2 extensive searches " within 4 mins I had seen some of my items who did the search Ray Charles and Stevie Wonder !!

 

I offered him before police arrived to settle the matter and asked him again has he got my stuff he said no I then told him that I had seen the items and was just waitinbg for police to confirm they were there

 

Police arrived and were good I told them the history and that they claim to not have my PPE and were charging me for it. I told her the location of my items and I had to discribe and say where my name was on the item she went back in and confirmed they were there !!! But said I had to leave as I was breaking the peace I co-operated fully although disappointed I couldnt get my items I am just glad that I have proof that the items my former employer say I have are in fact in there posession and wait to see what next!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya see, I personally think that these situations (having been there myself with an employer holding my gear) are essentially a criminal matter, as the employer is seemingly permanently depriving you of your possessions. Seeemingly, the police don't agree. They seem to always argue that it's a civil matter.

Contact the police and see if you can get a copy of the report made by the officer who attended. It might be of some help.

It is best though not to show up as you did though, it's a bit confrontational, and can be held to be trespass and breach of the peace.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes have no intention of going back just glad that I made my point with them , Be interesting to see if they continue to claim the item in question is not there or how are they going to explain that the item was there all along despite 2 "extensive searches" surely this and the evidence of lying regarding the HMRC P45 will be enough to prove they have been lying??. Will call at police station tomorrow and see if I can get the report . Are we entitled to see the report ?

 

Yes they claim it was civil matter also , I asked the officer If we took just 2-3 minutes we would probably locate all the items but werent that interested and just said chase it up with your solicitors Which will be too late and give them chance to remove all my items or destroy them. I have just spoken to 2 previous employees and can confirm they tried to charge them for a camera and some other items which they didnt have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if you're entitled to the report or not, I thought if you were involved with the police you were, but I might be wrong. If ya don't ask, ya won't get.

What I felt like doing when the police told me it was a civil matter was to get the yellow pages out, call up a couple of dozen local tradesmen and have them come round to my house with their tools. As soon as they were in, tell 'em to beep off and not allow 'em to take their tools with them. I wonder if the police would consider that to be a 'civil matter'?

How about hiring a car and not returning it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...