Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

where to start? PPI with welcome


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5148 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey, Got some great help off the welcome threads for a few things now really need to kick start my mis sold ppi and other insurances from 2004. Can anyone point me in right direction with letters and how much to claim please?

 

This account is now settled, VT'd some way through and took out new HP with them.

 

Agreement dated 26/2/04

 

ppi - 1935.99

mechanical breakdown - 650.00

emergency recovery - 330.00

shortfall ins - 145.00

collision call - 40.00

 

total premiums - 3100.91

finance charge - 1860.37

total amount payable - 4961.28

 

apr - 28.4%

 

48 monthly payments of 103.38

 

this agreement started with opening balance on 26/2/4 of £15081.12

 

the account finished on 20/11/06 with a balance of £7890.04. The only figure carried over to my new account was £1000.00.

 

I would just like to know if I have a claim for all the insurances I paid during this time? And if so how would I come to work out what amount to ask for? Fortunately I was cleverer on my 2nd account and didn't get stung for any insurances.

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have the account number send them a SAR, it will detail everything on the account, including the PPI. It should include a copy of the agreement which will demonstrate the breakdown of the total amount for credit.

 

if you then feel you were miss sold the insurance, write to them and complain, this has to be the first step, the FOS will not look at anything unless you have complained to the company who sold the insurance first.

 

You will have to state why you feel you were miss sold the product, etc, etc.

 

:D

9-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent:o !! Lloyds and Halifax!

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Capital One

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Halifax Card Services

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Marbles

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Halifax (Birchave0's sis)

8-3-07 PPI refund Lloyds TSB Loan £1200 + £2900 off loan balance

22-5-07 Halifax *Won* £1025

23-9-07 Goldfish 8k balance written off, £2300 PPI + charges returned, no agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the SAR from welcome, is there a standard letter to send to reclaim? Know my reasons for the mis selling. Just don't know how to go about getting a figure to reclaim or should I leave it for them to work out? Can I claim all 5 insurances? (ppi, med care, breakdown etc etc - never used any and I feel they were all totally underhandedly sold to me)

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there is a standard letter, just write to their complaints department, state why you feel you have a reason to complain.

 

If you feel the policy was not suitable for you, or you weren't advised you could purchase it elsewhere, or maybe they just added it without your knowledge or consent, put these down as the reasons.

 

Each PPI case is different so include as much info in your letter as you can and send it recorded delivery.

The FOS are upholding up 90% of PPI complaints, there is also a good chance that your complaint will be dealt with quite quickly and not even get to the FOS stage. :)

9-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent:o !! Lloyds and Halifax!

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Capital One

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Halifax Card Services

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Marbles

20-1-07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent Halifax (Birchave0's sis)

8-3-07 PPI refund Lloyds TSB Loan £1200 + £2900 off loan balance

22-5-07 Halifax *Won* £1025

23-9-07 Goldfish 8k balance written off, £2300 PPI + charges returned, no agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok brilliant.

 

I'll try and find someone else's letter from one of the threads somebody may have sent.

 

If for example i VT'd after 24 months of 48, I presume I ask for 24 * £103.38 (the monthly insurance premiums)(post1) = £2481.12. Nice! Do i ask for 8% statutory interest too? if so do I need to calculate each individual monthly payment + 8%?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally got my letter sorted and the charges worked out. Can anyone look at the letter and confirm that it's ok, please?

 

]Thanks...

Dear Sir/Madam

Agreement Number xxxxxxxxxx

 

I purchased the above Loan from you on the 26th February 2004, however included with the loan were a number of additional insurance products, namely Payment Protection Insurance, Mechanical Breakdown Insurance, Emergency Recovery, Shortfall Insurance and Collision Call. The reason I am writing to you is that I believe that all of the aforementioned policies were missold to me for the following reasons;-

Your salesperson did not tell me that these policies were optional

 

I have subsequently discovered that these policies that I was forced to have are in fact optional. This has left me feeling extremely hurt and disappointed at the fact that your salesperson has clearly taken advantage of my lack of knowledge for their own and / or their companies gain at my expense, not just once, but on several occasions.

 

At no point was I offered a quote without insurances attached to compare the cost, at no point was I told that these were optional, in fact as mentioned before I was informed that these policies were a necessity to be able to offer me the loan - a "fact" I know now to be untrue.

 

I feel extremely let down and misled on this matter, I had expected that I would be treated fairly as per your obligations to the Financial Services Authority, however on several occasions I have been treated extremely unfairly and so want matters resolved as a matter of urgency.

 

I am now requesting a full refund of all premiums, and subsequent interest on these payments, that I have paid to date. As I believe I have been deprived of this money I also expect 8% statutory interest, the amount a court would award, to be added to each payment made. The total amount of insurances that have been paid on this account equates to £2617.57 and the interest charges applied at 8% equates to £1007.69. Therefore the total claim is £3625.26. A full schedule of these charges is attached

 

I look forward to a full and prompt response to this letter and for the matter to be concluded within eight weeks or I shall be contacting the Financial Ombudsman to investigate my complaint.

Yours Faithfully,

 

Is 8 weeks correct or should I expect sooner?

 

Thanks

Edited by grantyblade
editing was all weird when i posted it
Link to post
Share on other sites

look nice.

 

now expect the 'questionaire throught to door soon...

delaying tactics........

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

answer each q none of your business

it wont make any odds

its just a stalling tactic.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...