Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

No agreed Overdraft £1000 in red due to their chrages!


wilko999
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5144 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Just a quick one to see if anyone else has been in this postion. I had a claim for over 3k of charges on the go until the court ruling. I was £1000 overdrawn on current account that had no overdraft. The entire £1000 is their bank charges! They've just issued a DN today to me. Just wondering if I have any course of action. My credit rating is ruined anyway so no intention to pay it back, why should I! But what can I do to resolve?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They signed up to the banking code.

 

This stated that up until november 2009, they had to give a minimum of 14 days notice of any charges or interest.

 

Did they?

 

If not then to to the FSA and make some noise. It won't do much but they don't like it. Also then state this in writing to A&L. They cack themselves when you do this. It makes the charges unlawful. Why do you think every other bank gives notice of the charges? They were so arrogant that they thought they could do what they like. They are very very wrong.

 

Was the account in dispute?

 

If it was and you were contesting the bank charges, they can not issue a DN.

 

Is the DN valid, there is a lot of help on here to test this, knowing them, almost certainly not.

 

You are NOT lost to this. You should have a 28 day remedy period in which to settle the debt. If you can persuade that it was in dispute, there is a chance that the DN can be recinded.

 

I am no expert at all in DN's you need to ask this in another area perhaps, the A&L are so vicous that no one really seems to bother fighting them and this area of the forum is a bit dead.

 

Other issues if it WAS in dispute and you can prove it, (i.e, letters from them rejecting charges arguments etc)

 

No further interest or charges can be put on the account when in dispute. I bet they did this though. Check.

 

As I said, check the DN is valid, that it has the 28 day period etc.

 

Look into the DN first of all and put the account into dispute NOW. Fax, email, recorded delivery.

Edited by disgruntledofcornwall
added more info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just re read the post. The account is in dispute. This is your defense.

 

I assume you wrote to them when they rejected your claim after the test case stating you want to continue to challenge the fees?

 

Then the account is still in dispute.

 

Go for this and the 14 day notice of charges then check the statements for charges while the account was in dispute, which you can reject.

 

You have a good chance with this I think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hijack but wanted to clarify a point in this thread...........

Do they have to give you notice when they are applying charges?

I went overdrawn today thanks to a direct debit (My fault entirely) and they apparently have charged me £28 already, so instead of being £20 overdrawn i'm nearly £50! Oh and it looks like they are returning the DD unpaid!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone

 

I am in a similar situation with Alliance and Leicester. My account was overdrawn due to bank charges for payment review fees and a direct debit that was rejected. I had no means of clearing the overdraft until my wages went in. I received a letter to say that the £181 should be paid into my account within 7 days or they would have no choice but to take further action. My wages went in 5 days after the letter and cleared the overdraft and put my account back in credit.

 

Later that month when my account was at zero balance i had further charges applied which put my account back to overdrawn.

 

I then received a letter to say despite previous reminders i had not cleared the overdraft (from the original letter with figure of £181) and that they had no alternative but to close my account and that i should not attempt to use my cards etc etc and i had to pay them £46 to clear what i owed them within 28 days

 

I received a letter a few days later to say i owed £190 (so this had up from £46) and if i didnt pay it within 7 days they would contact the credit agencies and issue a default notice.

 

I now have no account with them despite the fact that i paid the orginal bank charges they applied to my aco**** of £181 when my salary went in and it wasnt till a few weeks later that my account went overdrawn again.

 

The money they want from me now is for their bank charges and my credit rating has now been badly affected.

 

Do i have any rights?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...