Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wrong interest rate, but solicitor won't claim.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5196 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Before I came across this site I signed up with a Claims Management Company for four loans.

 

One of them was passed to Moon Beever Solicitors and I signed a Conditional Fee Arrangement with them for a Northern Rock loan they said is unenforceable due to an inadequate interest rate clause.

 

However, Moon Beever have now written to say that a technical point has been raised in defence of similar cases, which provides the Court with discretion as to whether to enforce or not, and Counsel advises that the court is unlikely to exercise discretion in my favour, and thus the ATE has been withdrawn and they cannot therefore issue proceedings.

 

I've read on CAG that we shouldn't claim anyway, but rather let creditor make a claim and then defend, as defending is easier.

 

I have attached a copy of the agreement below.

 

Should I now negotiate with Northern Rock a reduced payment (outstanding balance is over £16k and total unsecured debt is around £70k), or should I wait to see if they ever claim and try to get a better deal at that stage?

 

Regards

socleirigh

Northern Rock CCA.pdf

Regards

socleirigh

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

bumping ...

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Moon Beever solicitors have advised that they have sent the file back to the Claims Management Company (Clear Your Finance) to check whether there may other grounds on which to claim.

 

I have been trying to contact Clear Yopur Finance daily but always get a "user busy" message. I have even phoned at 11.00pm and still get the same message. I am starting to think that they no longer exist and I have lost £900 having three agreements audited by them last year.

 

I still haven't heard from Northern Rock since the solicitor withdrew the claim, but expect that I will hear from them soon.

 

Regards

socleirigh

Regards

socleirigh

Link to post
Share on other sites

The website for clear your finance doesn't seem to be working (if we are talking about the same one).

 

Perhaps contact trading standards and ask them to confirm the company's current status?

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi davey77

 

the website was working as recently as last week, as I had to check I was dialling the correct number, but you-re right its not working now, which adds more weight to my thoughts that they no longer exist.

 

I will contact trading standards as you suggest to see if they are still trading. Thanks for this idea.

 

Regards

socleirigh

Regards

socleirigh

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...