Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

land of leather/creations


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5200 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi i really hope you would be able to help me. i bought an "interest free for a year" sofa. i payed the exact amount owed by standing order each month and payed it off in full before the end of the interest free period. however i noticed today that for the last 4 months (after the interest free period) they have been taking out of my account a further £65.63 each month. i rang them and they said i owe a further £375.46! this money is the interest they have calculated on the account which they say i owe because to qualify for the interest free period i have to pay an end fee of £35 before the interest free period ends... which is apparently in the small print. is there anything you can suggest? i would really appreciate any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

i do not have agreement. the day i ordered the sofa i left land of leather with a leather cleaning kit and that was it. i have one letter from them saying they went into administration but was is it. i was the one that contacted them asking to pay it off in full within the interest free year. they sent me a standing order form and told me over the phone the amount to pay

Link to post
Share on other sites

Walltolla,

 

OK,

 

This is a classic example of where section 77 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 is supposed to protect consumers.

 

First things first you need to send off a request for information to Creation under section 77 of the consumer credit act together with a postal order for £1.

 

That can be as simple as:

 

Dear Sir,

 

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION UNDER SECTION 77 OF THE CONSUMER CREDIT ACT

 

Account Number: xxxx

Agreement Number: yyyy

 

Please send me all the information required under section 77 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

I enclose a postal order for the statutory fee of £1.

 

Yours

 

Waltolla

 

Either send it registered post or get a proof of posting from the counter at the post office.

 

They should send back within 12 working days a copy of the agreement together with a statement saying what you have paid and what you still owe.

 

Second they appear to have mislead you about free for a year if there was a termination fee; and

 

third if they had a direct debit mandate and the payment was properly due why did they not just take it from your bank account. Did they try to take a payment which was rejected?

 

On issues 2&3 I think it would be worth talking to your local council's trading standards department.

 

That should keep you going for the moment.

 

Dad

Link to post
Share on other sites

FAO The Complaints Department - Creation Consumer Finance Limited

 

Re Agreement No: ********

Account No: ********

 

On the "Annual Statement" you sent to my address this week, you stated this :- "Amount of Credit provided under the original agreement: £1249.00" and also the "Date of Agreement: 27/01/2009".

 

The original agreement i took out with yourselves (Creation Consumer Finance Limited) was a "1 year interest free agreement."

 

As you have informed me the "Date of Agreement was 27/01/2009, this means that my "1 year interest free agreement" ended 27/01/2010.

Please remember i have a copy of this document and will produce it if needed in a Court Of Law.

 

In addition to the payments i made to you stated on this "Annual Statement," i also made 3 payments of £113.55 on the following dates, 01/12/08, 30/12/08, 09/01/09.

 

Therefore the total amount i have payed to "Creation Consumer Finance Limited" is (11 months payment via standing order of £113.55 = £1249.05) + (3 months payment via direct debit mandate of £65.63 = £196.89) = £1445.94

 

To reiterate as stated on my "Annual Statement", (in your words) the "Amount of Credit provided under the original agreement: £1249.00".

This means that you, (Creation Consumer Finance Limited) owe me £196.94.

 

In a letter sent to me from yourselves (Creation Consumer Finance Limited), signed by 'George Sanderson', it states "Our decision to grant you a loan was on the basis that your repayments would be made by Direct Debit". This is incorrect.

 

I would like the £196.94 that you owe me sent in cheque form to my address this week.

I would like a letter confirming my account with "Creation Consumer Finance Limited" is closed and also stating that i do not owe the company any money.

I am also asking for a REQUEST FOR INFORMATION UNDER SECTION 77 OF THE CONSUMER CREDIT ACT.

Please send me all the information required under section 77 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

I enclose a postal order for the statutory fee of £1.

 

Yours

 

Mr Waltolla

Link to post
Share on other sites

Waltolla,

 

Can you scan and post the credit agreement, obviously removing your personal details, bar codes & signatures. I am particularly interested in the exact dates on the agreement and how it expresses the interest free period.

 

Did you contact your local trading standards?

 

Dad

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aaah, the old "you agreed to pay by DD" ploy. They did the same with me, and I sent them off with a flea in their ear, as I know what they don't, which is I wouldn't take an agreement with them if payment by DD had been a condition of it, as I believe that DD are the tool of the devil and do not take them unless there is absolutely no other way, something which I can substantiate if need be. I also made that very clear to the LoL salesman on the day of the purchase, and he faithfully promised I could pay by other means... And with LoL gone, there is no way Creation Finance can say otherwise anyway.

 

Keep an eye on them for those £30 charges, as the letter says "may", but as far as I know, they just bang them on anyway, and that is totally reclaimable.

 

IF they have a £35 end of BNPL fee included in their contracts, then you are going to have a hard time convincing a judge that you didn't know about it. You are after all supposed to read things before you sign the contract and if you put your signature to it, then you agree to it, so that could be tricky.

 

Also, you say you weren't given a copy of the contract. Whatever the reason for it, I think you are going to have problems with that one, the reason being the finance is provided by Creation, and they are not linked with LoL by any other link apart from them providing the finance, if that makes sense. In other words, there is no way Creation could have arranged a BNPL for you without the paperwork coming from LoL and Creation agreeing to giving you the finance. You must have signed something somewhere to obtain that finance surely? Furthermore, Creation must have written to you before about it, confirming the BNPL agreement, are you sure you haven't ignored some of their letters? I ask because you say you have only noticed after FOUR months that they were still helping themselves to your money and that, I'm sorry to say, suggests a certain lack of attention to financial matters.

 

Your saving grace may be that their paperwork is not in order/not compliant and this is where the CCA74 request comes in. If they can't supply a copy of the credit agreement, then they are going to be in a much weaker position. If they do have it, then your position is going to be much weaker. So it all rides on that really.

 

Please post whatever you receive in reply to your CCA request (with personal info removed of course) as soon as you get it and we'll be able to help further from there. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

To bookworm. Thank you for your input. Yes i agree i have not payed enough attention to my financial matters. I have been going through a very stressful time recently and have taken my eye off the ball. However this experience has taught me a nasty lesson which i will not forget. I am much for financially aware and i certainly would never take out a credit agreement ever again.

 

To Dad. Thank you so much for your support. I could not have done this without you. After these letters were sent LOL agreed to pay me back all of the money i had paid in interest. However cheesy this may sound, you have made a massive difference to my life and i couldn't possibly thank you enough.

Many thanks and best wishes

A very relieved Waltolla

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...