CCJ Help

[dx100uk]

you're still paying a 1993 CCJ! blimey!!

 

one you say default notes then you say default notices? which is it?

you can only have one default notice per debt unless you made a new agreement and subs broke it.

 

it also puzzles me why this is with a dca & you are paying a dca i take it?

 

if so, i hope its them thats named on the CCJ, if not, stop paying. a CCJ is NOT transferable.

 

dx

[dx100uk]

not receiving the dn makes no odds, not receiving the court papers does, and it might be able to be set aside, but after 15yrs+ that might bet interesting.

 

now, you elude dodgy behavious here esp with the two created ccj's?

 

what do you mean?

 

anyhow, back to my q above....whom is this dca and are they named on the ccj?

 

sorry but we need more info and who the leechers are too.

 

dx

[dx100uk]

no

you have nothing to worry about we know them all and we know all their tactics!!!!

 

you need to get this all out in the open to get it sorted.

 

if you need more courage.. just type the name of the DCA in the search in the blue bar above and read other horror stories.

 

dx

[dx100uk]

no, these are typical tactics for our leechers.

once a CCJ exists,they do not need to send them

if you are looking to get the CCJ set aside, the only way will be by proving the papers wee sent to the wrong AD, but after 15yrs this will be a tall order.

 

bryan carter is one of the fav for doing this. as well as phanton court paperwork.

 

if whom you are paying is NOT named on the CCJ, they cannot use it to demand payment. IT IS NOT TRANSFEREABLE

 

anyhow

 

i'm shooting in the dark.

 

we need the story and the names, else we are worthless to you.

 

dx

[dx100uk]

Hi all,

 

I have read some of the posts and one in particular was very interesting and it was in connection to Default Notices

 

"Law of Property Act 1925 section 136 'Legal assignments of things in action'

 

(3) Any notice required or authorised by this Act to be served shall be sufficiently served if it is left at the last-known place of abode or business in the United Kingdom of the lessee, lessor, mortgagee, mortgagor, or other person to be served, or, in case of a notice required or authorised to be served on a lessee or mortgagor, is affixed or left for him on the land or any house or building comprised in the lease or mortgage, or, in case of a mining lease, is left for the lessee at the office or counting-house of the mine.

 

 

Does this apply to my particular case?

 

Marse

 

 

 

yes

 

dx

[dx100uk]

marse it makes no diff to me if you make a pigs ear of it. i'll still help.

now, having read your threads , there are certainly 2 maybe 3 that need merging.

but ofcourse we are going around in circles.

 

no matter, but i see you are rather like me shall we say...of the old school! and always keep things to your chest.

 

you dont need to now-a-days.

 

i'm glad you've contacted the mods, i'll bounce this too and get the threads mereged.

 

i'm glad what i was saying here tallies with the advise on the other tread ofthe same subject.

 

anyhow

 

chin up OM

 

we can lick these leechers & get you loads of money back i'm sure

 

we just need the story and a few facts..

 

glad to help

 

dx

[dx100uk]

put it all briefly down in one message, the lot about this whole reason you are posting

 

just use double line breaks between sentences like this

 

then it makes it easier to digest!

 

we'll get there.

 

dx

[dx100uk]

ok

 

questions time.

 

1. give me the judgement figure on the original ccj that you had to pay £10PCM for

 

2.have you always been paying to the OC and NO-ONE else?

 

3.give me the name on the judgement to whom you had to pay

 

4. in post 7 you mention the joining of two A/C's, pardom my understanding, but i take it this DID NOT happen, butthe judge order you to continue £10PCM? what date was this?

 

general bits:

 

NEVER EVER talk to a DCA on the phone, demand every thing in writing & NEVER EVER call them yourself.

 

the DCA CANNOT use a CCJ taken out by an OC against you, they must BE NAMED on the judgement, it's binding legalities ARE NOT transfereable to ANYONE bar the co NAMED in the CCJ.

 

you have paid £1920 on this judgement.

 

more tomorrow on answers to above.

 

dx

[dx100uk]

sorry marse

i'm gonna be out of time all today.

 

i'll catch up withyou tomorrow eve

 

dx

[dx100uk]

sorry marse

 

i'm still rather busy.

 

but don't worry the big guns are coming onboard.

 

now

i currently have two schools of thought and i've not got the time to research either to assertain which is best.

 

1. write to each leecher and demand back the excess payments [bar the £300ish judgement ] back with 8% stat int on top, within 14 days else start court proceeding.

 

2. go straight to court.

 

there are sev things that need investigating, one of which [and my ears are wriggling on this one!] contact the court of the judgement and tell them what has been going on ... i wonder if they will directly help a 71yrs get it sorted.

 

or again

go thru the process of getting it set aside and bring this up during that hearing.

 

i'm just not sure...

 

dx

[dx100uk]

hey

thats what we're here for.

 

site team are on to it just wait a fews or less days.

 

if i can get my act together i'll investigate but my brain is fried with pers issues at present.

 

dx

[dx100uk]

funny my last post vanished........

 

phone the courts named and ask how many ccj's are against you

 

there is a website too, but i dont know it.

 

dx

[dx100uk]

i certainly don't doubt marse!

 

dx

[dx100uk]

ive been keep watch marse

just that some of this goes whoosh over my head.

 

have you tried just asking for you money back? [the £1920] + 8%

if forget?

 

dx