Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I have found this group very helpful hence I am here seeking help and advice.   I got myself into a situation where I have now more than £50k in unsecured debts (personal loans & credit cards) and things are now getting out of control as I am struggling to make payments. This is purely my own created situation and I am taking 100% responsibility for it. I am keen to get out of this situation as soon as possible hence I would appreciate any help and advice in this process. I am employed at the moment and don’t want to risk going into IVA or bankruptcy as this would risk losing my job. Being sole bread earner of my family, I cannot afford to lose my job. I have been trying to keep up with the payments so far and had few missed payments instances until 3/4 months ago but got caught up with missed payments somehow using my savings. All my debts are still with original lenders. However I know I am getting into same situation again shortly and won’t be able to get out of it again. I have started exploring Debt Management Plan (DMP) option through StepChange but haven’t submitted it yet. Based on budgeting, I have around £820 available to make payments to all lenders after taking care of all other essential expenses. This is definitely lot more affordable than what I am currently paying to different lenders. 1. Is DMP right option for me in current situation? 2. what are the negative consequences of availing DMP? 3. is there something else that I can do to get out of this situation? I’m determined to clear out all my debts but need bit of breathing space and time. Let me know please if you need any additional information. Thanks in advance for all your help and guidance. MM  
    • Bookmakers use betting on political events to entice new customers, and say it is growing.View the full article
    • nope  and  neither dx
    • Ok Thank you DX will do just that . will keep you up dated.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Advent Computer Training (Barclays Career Development Loan) discussion


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3938 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi guys,my husband is in same,we borrowed the money to pay of cdl before interest started...but we phoned barclays yesterday and thay confirmed will find another trainin provider for him, thay checked all details,and said thay will send letter with confirmation.i also took detils of person we spoken to,so it dosnt look that bad i think.Any way that what was on bbc news chanel...

.....

Advent arranged credit agreements through Barclays, which was made aware of the closure on Thursday morning.

Barclays spokesman Andrew Bond said: "We recognise how important this training is for people and have formed a dedicated team to help ANY STUDENTS find equivalent or better training at no extra cost to them so they can fulfil their aims."

 

 

 

fingers cross

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update for everyone. I have just spoken to Government advise line for Career Development Loans who informed me that we are within our rights to transfer to another training provider should we wish to do so. Not sure how this will work however. She advised me to phone Consumer direct who asked about my loan agreement with Barclays which unfortunately I have mis-placed. Does anyone happen to have a copy? as the lady at consumer direct said that if it is a regulated agreement then I should be covered under the consumer credit act. Im not sure if it is a regulated loan so if anyone knows I would be grateful for the info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update for everyone. I have just spoken to Government advise line for Career Development Loans who informed me that we are within our rights to transfer to another training provider should we wish to do so. Not sure how this will work however. She advised me to phone Consumer direct who asked about my loan agreement with Barclays which unfortunately I have mis-placed. Does anyone happen to have a copy? as the lady at consumer direct said that if it is a regulated agreement then I should be covered under the consumer credit act. Im not sure if it is a regulated loan so if anyone knows I would be grateful for the info.

 

It is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I scanned my CDL and Advent T&C's and emailed them to Trading Standards yesterday. I can email them to you if you PM me your email address.

 

Barclays are trying to get out of doing anything for anyone who has gone over the 2 year loan period and already paid off the loan. They did however imply that they are helping anyone that is still within the 2 year period or currently paying the loan back by Direct Debit. They are in no position to state who has or hasn't finished the course, so they have left themselves out in the open!! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everybody,

 

What's the latest on this? I've literally JUST heared about this. No letters, no emails, nothing. I'm really quite shocked.

 

I took out a career development loan at the turn of 2008. I paid for MCSA with CCNA and I'm 3 modules from completion.

 

Joe

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had yet another conversation with Barclays and Consumer Direct. Consumer direct advised me to call Barclays and ask for some forms to make a claim under Section 75 etc. I did this but as has been stated before, the very unhelpful guy at Barclays said that due to my agreement with them going over the 2 year period stated on my agreement, they are no longer liable and and I have to finish payments. This whole thing is just a nightmare. Does anyone know of any loophole to get round this? I am now basically stuck with no training and £5000 of debt!!!! Gonna try trading standards and local MP but not sure if it will do any good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just had a conversation with Trading Standards about the Barclays T&C's that I scanned an emailed to them. I've been told that as far as they can see, Barclays ARE liable under Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and are also in no position to refuse anyone that is now past the 2 year loan period (or paid off the loan) an alternate training provider or possible refund.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Started Mcse in march 2007 through a Barclays development loan. I have had a lot of trouble (personal) in the last two years.One reason i went through Advent is that i knew how flexible they would be. I had my course extended. I done the A+ and have been studying like crazy for the mcdst. I have pulled out all the info. In the paperwork for the Career development loan it states the following..........IT IS IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO BE AWARE THAT YOU WILL HAVE TO REPAY YOUR LOAN, EVEN IF YOU DO NOT COMPLETE THE COURSE. THIS APPLIES EVEN IF THE LEARNING PROVIDER CEASES TRADING OR YOU ARE DISSATISFIED WITH YOUR COURSE.

 

Im getting frantic now. I was made redundant in June and have depended on this course heavily only to find out that T&C's don't cover us!

 

One thing to think of.........If you had paid for your course with a Barclaycard would you be covered!!!!

 

I have been advised to go to the Banking Ombusman

 

Any help you guys can provide would be great.

 

Been trying to find the offical receiver but no joy as yet!!

 

Regards Burt

Edited by Bert Burling
error
Link to post
Share on other sites

IT IS IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO BE AWARE THAT YOU WILL HAVE TO REPAY YOUR LOAN, EVEN IF YOU DO NOT COMPLETE THE COURSE. THIS APPLIES EVEN IF THE LEARNING PROVIDER CEASES TRADING OR YOU ARE DISSATISFIED WITH YOUR COURSE.

 

 

I am not familiar with the Career Developement Loan agreement but generally:

 

S75 of the Consumer Credit Act applies to debtor-creditor-supplier agreements, in other words the money was paid directly to the supplier (Advent) by the creditor (Barclays).

 

If the money was paid to you by Barclays directly and with that you then the paid a supplier of your choice, the link is broken. Although the agreement is covered by the Act, S75 does not apply.

 

Did they pay the money directly to Advent or to you?

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

"IT IS IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO BE AWARE THAT YOU WILL HAVE TO REPAY YOUR LOAN, EVEN IF YOU DO NOT COMPLETE THE COURSE. THIS APPLIES EVEN IF THE LEARNING PROVIDER CEASES TRADING OR YOU ARE DISSATISFIED WITH YOUR COURSE."

 

 

I am not so sure if this could be challenged under UTCC or even the supply of goods and services act.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paid Direct to Advent, Been advised by trading standards to send the usual Breach of contract letter to advent and a letter to Barclay's stating that i am holding them partly liable for breach of contract under the consumer credit act. Sent them this morning so they should get it Tuesday...........wait and see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IT IS IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO BE AWARE THAT YOU WILL HAVE TO REPAY YOUR LOAN, EVEN IF YOU DO NOT COMPLETE THE COURSE. THIS APPLIES EVEN IF THE LEARNING PROVIDER CEASES TRADING OR YOU ARE DISSATISFIED WITH YOUR COURSE.

 

That was stated in the information pack that came with the CDL paperwork, but it is not stated in the T&C's of the loan. Trading Standards have been through the Barclays T&C's that I sent to them and also asked me further questions about everything. They are telling me that Barclays are liable.

 

It seems that we are in a similar situation, although I started my course a few months after you did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paid Direct to Advent

 

Oops. Then I wouldn't be having it, in my opinion S75 applies.

 

IT IS IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO BE AWARE THAT YOU WILL HAVE TO REPAY YOUR LOAN, EVEN IF YOU DO NOT COMPLETE THE COURSE. THIS APPLIES EVEN IF THE LEARNING PROVIDER CEASES TRADING OR YOU ARE DISSATISFIED WITH YOUR COURSE.

As I understand it - the agreement itself states that in fact that it is a regulated agreement under CCA '74. No clause in a regulated agreement can overule the provisions of the Act - that's why they passed it into law.

They're trying it on.

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing that will not stand in my favour is that i have been made redundant and i am not making the full monthly payments as im skint, and possibly the fact that Advent did extend my course (where do i stand with that).....Anyway im not the type of person to take things like this with a shrug of a shoulder..........Bring it on....will keep you updated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Administrators for:

 

Advent Computer Training Ltd - Company No 04511374.

(prev name was Advent consulting Ltd)

 

Access 2 Careers Ltd Company No 05260747

(prev name was Anglo Capital Ltd)

 

have now been appointed.

 

They are:

 

PKF Accountants

New Guild House

45 Great Charles St

Queensway

Birmingham

B3 2LX

 

They have a dedicated number for Advent/Access - 0844 770 1921

 

E-mail: adventcomputertraining@uk pkf.com

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive been on the phone to barclays and apparently i finished my course last month (news to me), and as of march ive got to start paying the loan back (£4750). now i wouldnt mind but ive not even done half of the course. i only found out about advent going bust yesterday (22/02) and that was from looking for other stuff online, no communication of any sort from advent or the administrators. i dont have my loan agreement or any of my paperwork from barclays or advent, would anyone be kind enough to send me a copy of the T&Cs.

chris

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

:confused:

After finding out I'm in the same situation I've been trying to find out as much as I can. I contacted Trading Standards (actually in the form of Consumer Direct and I'd advise anyone to do the same and ask them what to do which involves writing to the Administrators and also Barclays). Seems like the final say lies with the Ombudsman so I'm not certain that we have no rights under Section 75 even with a Career Development Loan and having been studying for over 2 years (I've not been assured we do for certain either though)- the Ombudsman can be involved after replies are received to the letters (have been told to quote the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 to the administrators and the Consumer Credit Act 1974 to Barclays but speak to Consumer Direct for full details of what to write). We need to send the letter to the administrators as a covering letter to Barclays, along with the letter to Barclays.

Hope this can be of help

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just had a conversation with Trading Standards about the Barclays T&C's that I scanned an emailed to them. I've been told that as far as they can see, Barclays ARE liable under Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and are also in no position to refuse anyone that is now past the 2 year loan period (or paid off the loan) an alternate training provider or possible refund.

Hope this is how it pans out - as far as I can tell the Ombudsman decides and can take into account fairness as well as the terms of contract.

Good luck everyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posting this from the BPF thread - hopefully it can help BPF or CDL financed students but who knows:

8.- (1) A personal credit agreement is an agreement between an individual ("the debtor") and any other person ("the creditor") by which the creditor provides the debtor with credit of any amount.

 

12. A debtor-creditor-supplier agreement is a regulated consumer credit agreement being -

 

(a) a restricted use credit agreement which falls within section 11(1)(a), or

 

(b) a restricted use credit agreement which falls within section 11(1)(b) and is made by the creditor under preexisting arrangements, or in contemplation of future arrangements, between himself and the supplier, or

 

© an unrestricted use credit agreement which is made by the creditor under preexisting arrangements between himself and a person (the "supplier") other than the debtor in the knowledge that the credit is to be used to finance a transaction between the debtor and the supplier.

So we'd want our agreements to be Debtor-Creditor-Supplier agreements and hopefully (in my case and others I'm sure) it won't matter if we were told to put the Course End Date as 2 years from the Start Date given it was a Distance Learning Course we hadn't completed

Here's Section 11 of the same Consumer Credit Act 1974 too:

11 Restricted-use credit and unrestricted-use credit

(1) A restricted-use credit agreement is a regulated consumer credit agreement—

(a) to finance a transaction between the debtor and the creditor, whether forming part of that agreement or not, or

(b) to finance a transaction between the debtor and a person (the “supplier”) other than the creditor, or

© to refinance any existing indebtedness of the debtor’s, whether to the creditor or another person,

and “restricted-use credit” shall be construed accordingly.

(2) An unrestricted-use credit agreement is a regulated consumer credit agreement not falling within subsection (1), and “unrestricted-use credit” shall be construed accordingly.

(3) An agreement does not fall within subsection (1) if the credit is in fact provided in such a way as to leave the debtor free to use it as he chooses, even though certain uses would contravene that or any other agreement.

(4) An agreement may fall within subsection (1)(b) although the identity of the supplier is unknown at the time the agreement is made

Link to post
Share on other sites

There have been issues of dodgyness lets say with the Career Development Loan scheme before:

MPs to investigate Career Development Loans [problem] highlighted by IITT | News | IT Training Magazine | Training | Qualifications, Training, Careers | BCS - The Chartered Institute for IT

Given this and the obvious role Barclays is said to have played in Advent's problems (by withdrawing Finance agreements) surely it's only fair Barclays and/or the Government refund students?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick re-run of a post a made some time ago.

 

S75 of the Consumer Credit Act applies to debtor-creditor-supplier agreements, in other words the money was paid directly to the supplier (Advent) by the creditor (Barclays).

 

If the money was paid to you by Barclays directly and with that you then the paid a supplier of your choice, the link is broken. Although the agreement is covered by the Act, S75 does not apply.

 

If the money was paid directly to Advent for the purpose of funding the course the above applies - full stop.

 

Despite what Barclays will tell you and with experience of them they well try to defend it in court, (at least ever up to the front door of the court) - you have recourse to Barclays for the cost of the course.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick re-run of a post a made some time ago.

 

 

 

If the money was paid directly to Advent for the purpose of funding the course the above applies - full stop.

 

Despite what Barclays will tell you and with experience of them they well try to defend it in court, (at least ever up to the front door of the court) - you have recourse to Barclays for the cost of the course.

 

David

Thanks David,

Yeah I was hopeful when I read your previous post on page 2, including this:

As I understand it - the agreement itself states that in fact that it is a regulated agreement under CCA '74. No clause in a regulated agreement can overule the provisions of the Act - that's why they passed it into law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

When we took out the loan we had to use a company that barclays approved though didnt we! Its a while ago but im sure they gave you a list of companies that they would give a loan for you to use. So surely they have responsibility by recommending them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...