Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ben told to vt again!


westentertainer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5215 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi , been on these forums a few times about the same thing over the last few years...

purchased a renault espace 3 years ago used WELCOME for the finance..worst car i have ever owned [only done 4000 miles in 3 years] spent more time off road than on,,anyway VT;d it bacl last april 2009 recieved letter of welcome saying i would have to pay 1200 pounds for 2 months arears and gap and also for the warranty,made arrangments to pay 100 a month off this to i have done for last 8 months, someone called my wife to pick up the car months ago but i was in work she asked them to call again ,they did but was on holiday ,they said that they would pick up the car when they were in the area ,but never did ,the car has been on my drive for the last 11 months...right¬¬ i had a call from a lady at welcome today saying that i now owe 2000 pounds arears mmmm

she said because the car was not picked up,and it was my responsibilty to keep contacting them the arears increased,,i told her that was a cracking way to make people pay ,let them vt the car ,then not pick it up and then i would have to vt it again from now and still pay the arears can they do this any help please its pending now

Link to post
Share on other sites

no no no, this seems all wrong to me. what they are telling you is a load of rubbish.

 

If you have confirmation in writing that you have VT'd and that they will collect the car, then its up to them and their problem if they dont collect.

 

go tell them to play on the motorway!

 

I would also question whether what they told you about the warranty and gap insurance is correct because my understanding is that when a policy is cancelled, a refund is paid back, give or take a month or so.

 

I would certainly look into this and perhaps someone else can offer more advice. but the general jist is that Welcome pay the premium upfront, then charge you over the term of your agreement for it. now the way I see it, is that Welcome cancelled the polices, took the refund and then asked you to still pay the rest. So basically they are doubling their money.

 

and I also bet ya that the Warranty was over 24 months only, but if you had a 48 month agreement, you would be paying for it over 48 months. thereofre paying more interest than you should.

 

I would do a subject access request to get all the info they hold for your agreements with them. I bet it turns up some interesting information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no no no, this seems all wrong to me. what they are telling you is a load of rubbish.

 

If you have confirmation in writing that you have VT'd and that they will collect the car, then its up to them and their problem if they dont collect.

 

go tell them to play on the motorway!

 

I would also question whether what they told you about the warranty and gap insurance is correct because my understanding is that when a policy is cancelled, a refund is paid back, give or take a month or so.

 

I would certainly look into this and perhaps someone else can offer more advice. but the general jist is that Welcome pay the premium upfront, then charge you over the term of your agreement for it. now the way I see it, is that Welcome cancelled the polices, took the refund and then asked you to still pay the rest. So basically they are doubling their money.

 

and I also bet ya that the Warranty was over 24 months only, but if you had a 48 month agreement, you would be paying for it over 48 months. thereofre paying more interest than you should.

 

I would do a subject access request to get all the info they hold for your agreements with them. I bet it turns up some interesting information.

thanks so what should i ask them ;;subject acess request; i will check my warranty
Link to post
Share on other sites

well for the insurances you need to contact Direct Group. they administer all the insurances and will send out documents to you if you quote them your welcome agreement reference number. just say you have lost them. They may say it had been cancelled, but if they do just say that you still need the info.

 

Direct Group - Where Insurance and Innovation Combine - Home Page is their website with phone numbers.

 

There is a Subject Access Report letter somewhere in the forum so check other threads of hopefulyl someone else will come along and post it on here for you. This will cost you £10 though. use a postal order for this and what ever you do, do not sign any letters you send out! just print your name. most important.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i phoned the RAC WARRANTY CUSTOMER SERVICES and was told that the waranty had ceased on the 6th march 2009, i also asked about the gap ,she told me that becomes null and void when the contract ends for any reason,,WELCOME will be ringing me on the last day of this month for my normal 100 pounds..i think i should tell them to;go away in short sharp jerking movements;

 

any thing else i need to do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm interesting, try giving them a ring again and ask how much the premium was and when that was paid, and how much was refunded when the policy was cancelled if any.

 

worth a shot and this info will be dynamite in the fight against welcome if you can get it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why was the gap etc cancelled

could it be the vt

what about any rebate as allready mentioned

 

you mention rac warranty

did direct group tell you this

 

welcome do there own gap disguised by direct group as the norm

hi it states in the small print on the gap waranty that it ends when the contract ends for whatever reason.

the 2 forms that i had has the RAC phone numbers and account numbers.

 

no rebate mentioned...at the moment i am paying £100 per month for waranty and gap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...