Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

First Revenue Debt Collection and Orange


Venjada
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5322 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hopefully someone may be able to give me some advice on this problem.

 

My son had a mobile phone contract with Orange during 2004 and 2005. In 2005 he was posted to Germany as part of his army career, where he has stayed until August this year. I was not aware but he never terminated his contract with Orange and now First Revenue have sent him a demand for just over £600. This is the first he has heard from them since going to Germany. I wrote a letter for him to them claiming no knowledge of the debt and asking for them to prove their claims

 

What they have supplied is a photocopy of a statement of account. The thing is though this photocopy just doesn't look right. It looks like someone has got or even made a badly formatted statement and then laid it on a piece of Orange letterhead paper before copying it. This is quite evident as the body text of the statement is no where near in line with the printing on the actual letterhead. In my honest opinion it looks like someone is trying to pull a fast one, more seriously though, surely this amounts to some sort of fraud ?

 

I personally and honestly feel that that this document that they have sent is by no means a copy of a genuine document ( even Orange are not sloppy enough to print their statements on a slant !!)

 

What I am asking for is any advice as to who or where to go with this and what action could I possibly take

 

I thank you for reading this and if you can offer any advice or help it would be very much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Telecoms Forum.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he owes the money Orange can (and probably have) ruined his credit file. He'll need to get a copy of this.

 

Don't deal with a debt collector. They just add to expenses and tell lies in my experience!

 

I see what you mean by the paper and the statement, My belief (I have no proof but I'm sure in my own mind) is that the debt collectors have headed paper and some notes of the account, and they print these off to look official. Another reason that I'd never deal with a debt collector.

 

If he chooses to not repay, he will have this on his credit file for 6 years, and if he gets a CCJ against him then the 6 years will be from that date. (that is not my choice to make... I'd suggest he should write to Orange, asking for a final statement directly from them, and asking for an address for their collections department to arrange repayment.) If he repays it will be on his credit file but marked as settled.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

What they have supplied is a photocopy of a statement of account. The thing is though this photocopy just doesn't look right. It looks like someone has got or even made a badly formatted statement and then laid it on a piece of Orange letterhead paper before copying it. This is quite evident as the body text of the statement is no where near in line with the printing on the actual letterhead. In my honest opinion it looks like someone is trying to pull a fast one, more seriously though, surely this amounts to some sort of fraud ?

 

I personally and honestly feel that that this document that they have sent is by no means a copy of a genuine document ( even Orange are not sloppy enough to print their statements on a slant !!)

 

It looks like genuine letterhead to me, with Orange's registered office address details and France Telecom's logo on it, although it's quite small blurry and difficult to make out.

 

If you suspect a forgery ask Orange if the document is genuine. I wouldn't have thought they would supply their letterhead to a debt collector, this could have all sort of negative reprucussions if the DCA misused it.

 

Its probably has just been printed by someone who hasn't bothered to setup the printer correctly at Orange, this would seem to be the simplest explanation, rather than a sinister plot involving a DCA forging documents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is it forging? You ask for the last statement, the DCA uses an orange letter headed bit of paper and prints the last transactions on the account. I've had similar done to myself (although that involved a CCA) and when I questioned the original creditor they've said they didn't send anything out. Thats why I personally won't deal with, or trust a DCA.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Locutas and Human Writes for you thoughts on this. I didn't realise that the upload was so small, but the general formatting of the statement and appearance just don'tlook right or proffessional

 

If you suspect a forgery ask Orange if the document is genuine. I wouldn't have thought they would supply their letterhead to a debt collector, this could have all sort of negative reprucussions if the DCA misused it.

 

 

Orange would not have to supply a letterhead. Any old Orange bill or letter can easily be altered and some other piece of paper with a statement on it poorly attached and photocopied to make it look like it was from Orange.

 

Obviously I will give this some thought before deciding upon which avenue to proceed along

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...