Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A claim was issued against you on 22/04/2024 Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 06/05/2024 at 13:28:08 Your acknowledgment of service was received on 07/05/2024 at 01:05:18 Your defence was submitted on 23/05/2024 at 21:20:03 Your defence was received on 24/05/2024 at 08:05:43
    • I drove a friends a car for a few days and I used cuvva car insurance to insure myself for the time period. Here's the problem: I made a mistake with the dates on the insurance, I ended up driving uninsured for one day and I got a speeding ticket. My friend named me as the driver on the Notice of Intended Prosecution as she should and I will take the blame of course. Will met police ask for proof that I was in fact driving? I mean, any more other than me replying to the NIP that I will soon receive from them? Cause I assume that my insurance for the day will be the proof that they need... Secondly,  if caught driving uninsured, what will happen please? I read it's £300 and 6 points. Is that all or is it worse? I'm only asking for information from knowledgable people. If you intent to just mock, you're certainly not helping. Thanks
    • Hi, Please find letter sent to BMW with all evidence off issues which is a link from Audi. Unable to share the footage on this forum as I am not the best with tech BMW FAULTY CAR LETTER.docx
    • This is the first item that I've ever claimed for - I don't really send too many parcels, probably 5 in the last 5 years, and only two with P2G / EVRi. I've attached two emails from P2G regarding their requiring the documents. They don't specify in the emails what documents I should be sending, although when opening the claim they were requesting that I needed photographic proof of sending - picture of the parcel with their label attached, in the EVRi ParcelShop. The second email is their closing the enquiry due to my failure to produce said document(s). I haven't yet drafted my claim letter, I wanted to be sure of this document situation first before I began action. But therein lies another problem. Not having a P2G account, I cannot be sure of the item value that I declared. The retail value at the time was £600, which is less than the £650 I paid several months earlier, so I would likely have used that, but cannot be sure. And without having an account I can't check either. But, I know that I did properly declare the item and a value that reflected its then retail price - I was concerned this declaration may have been used to single the item for theft. But now that the retail price has reduced substantially, even though the nature of compensation is to return the claimant back to their original position, without my purchase receipt, I was concerned that I may have to claim for less. And yes, I've been through your huge document store of information, in addition to MoneySavingExpert, Which, Citizens Advice, Gov.uk "make a court claim", my own law books (annoyingly I specialised in consumer law when I studied for my law degree, but I graduated 17 years ago), and so now feel that its time to either act, or drop it. P2G Enquiry (2).pdf P2G Enquiry (1).pdf
    • I have found both forms online  https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/62e14db38fa8f5649f912647/TE9.pdf https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60c73ad0d3bf7f4bd6a9bc69/te7-dart-eng.pdf   do i just fill in both forms and send to the address on them or directly to Manchester council  forgive my ignorance    thanking you in advance 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

'Arrangement To Pay' on File but Charges Case Won


LukaP
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5313 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have put some more information in post #7 as my issue was quite brief.

 

Hi Everyone,

 

I have some issues with my Credit Report. I have checked it on both Experian and Equifax. Two years ago I went behind with 5 payments on my HSBC Credit Card. I then entered into an 'Arrangement to Pay' which was done over 5 months and the debt was totally cleared.

 

Now, earlier this year I disputed my charged with HSBC CC Services and won. My question is; will this help me in removing the AtP from my credit report? HSBC compensated me on the charges and I still have all the old documentation.

 

This is the only thing affecting my credit score and I'm hoping something can be done.

 

Many Thanks,

Luke.

Edited by LukaP
Link to post
Share on other sites

Shame. If you could have argued that the whole 'debt' was covered by the charges it might have made the job easier.

 

Getting any information removed from your credit file is difficult. Information that is technically accurate is going to be almost impossible to change. I can't remember off hand how long payment information stays on your account. If it's not going to be there much longer, it's probably not worth the effort of trying to get it removed. Do the entries now show that the account is settled in full?

 

If you really want to have a go at this, have a read of some of the 'default removal' threads which should give you an idea of what you might be up against.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, then entries show the account has been settled in full. It had 'Arrangements' updated on the entry in May 2008, then the payments were all on time from there.

 

I'll try and find out how long the information stays on there.

 

Many thanks, any other help/advice anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Case Update:

 

I thought I'd just put in a little more info here as my main post is not the best. When I went into this Arrangement to Pay I was not aware of the affect it would have on my credit file. I was called by someone from CapQuest from their mobile requesting payment for the debt. They said I could either pay it in one go or set up payments over a few months, as any normal person would, I opted for the payments. I was not told in any way, either by letter or over the phone, that it would have and adverse impact on my credit file. This is what I'm disputing, they did not inform me adequately and now I'm paying the price. I didn't formally accept the arrangement to pay, the payment ammounts were not reduced, the full debt was paid off, the interest was not frozen.

 

So do I have a case?

 

 

Update:

 

Sent a letter to HSBC last week asking them politely to remove the ATP from my credit file. Got a reply this morning saying they would not be able to do that as it accurately reflects the way the account was handled.

 

I'm unsure where to go from here, but I'm thinking of sending a S.A.R. to HSBC for the CC account. The debt was sold to CapQuest. I'd like to get some info from CapQuest to prove they did not inform me properly. I just want to show they conned me into repaying the debt without telling me about the affect on my credit file. I'd have paid the debt off in one go if I knew it would cause this much trouble!

 

Any help would be appreciated, either on where to go from here or what further action to take.

 

Kind Regards,

Luke.

Edited by LukaP
More information on case.
Link to post
Share on other sites

When I checked my credit file the other day it only showed the payment history for the last thirty six months - three years.

 

However if you really want this to be removed, write back to HSBC setting out what you said about capquest. Mark the letter 'complaint'. In the meantime, you could send a SAR to HSBC but it wouldn't get you any info about what CapQuest did or didn't tell you. If the debt was sold to Capquest, why are HSBC still recording info on your credit file?

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I can't understand. My debt was sold so what are HSBC doing still recording the payment history?

 

I'm really keen on getting this removed as it won't be gone until Nov 2014! Who do I need to attack then, HSBC or CapQuest? And the even bigger question, how?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...