Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The case against the US-based ride-hailing giant is being brought on behalf of over 10,800 drivers.View the full article
    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

rbs cca request is this valid


smudge1977
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5108 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hello

 

after a little bit of help. before finding your forum and on the advice of local cab i sent off for my cca which i used the letter attached dated 15/3/9. im001

 

i then recieved a response im002 dated 14/9/9 saying they could not find any of requested documents

 

i need to confirm this is fine. i have had one or two things going on this year and forgot id sent the initial letter. and resent one of the sites templates in august but just after ccj issued to me which i must admit i admitted debt.

 

the thing is on my set asside hearing the judge said if i had a request prior to the ccj then he would have considered it.

 

i got this letter by chance by phoning rbs and asking for a copy and luckily enough they obliged.

 

i want to appeal but dont want to waste 75 pounds again if im still in the wrong.

 

thanks for looking

 

rgds

james smith

img001.jpg

img002.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hiya All

 

I had my original set aside hearing last november and because i did not have the attached paperwork it was thrown out of court.

on returning home i was able to dupe rbs into faxing required documents to me and posted here as above.

However on speaking to the enforcement team back then they told me to apply for set aside again which i did and the hearing wa 070510 which fitted in with rbs request for charging order.

 

The judge was quick to point out that i should have applied for appeal and quickly threw out my request again saying you cannot have 2 set aside hearings for same debt.

he also went ahead and issued the charging order which was secured against my property.

 

i queried the none cca and he said because of my omision on ccj forms the debt is now enforceable and there is nothing i could do about it.

He also advised that i would be wasting my time appealing.

 

I found them patronising on both occasions because i did not have legal representation in place.

 

my query is are they correct and also i am told interest will be charged at 8% which means in the time my house is paid off i could have given them 50k on a 28k debt and will still owe 42k.

 

Im now wondering if there are any good solicitors i can contact dont mind paying but told i have 14 days to appeal.

 

Thanks for help

 

Regards

James Smith

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stat Interest doesn't accrue on a regulated judgment.

 

You need to find as much information as possible in order to determine your next move.

 

Alter to suite.

 

 

DATA PROTECTION ACT 1998 SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST

 

This Subject Data Access Request is made under sections 7, 8 & 9 of the Data Protection Act 1998, and by virtue of the Data Protection (Subject Access) ( Fees and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations 2000 ( S.I..No 191)

 

Please supply us with all data that you hold on us. This includes in particular, but is not limited to, the following:-

1. The original signed, executed mortgage agreement and any terms and conditions that applied at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

2. Transcripts of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations by your company, or by any previous creditor.

3. Where there has been any event in our account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, we require disclosure of any indication notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention.

4. True copies of any assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you sent us with a copy of proof of postage that you hold.

5. Documents relating to any insurances added to the account, including any title indemnity insurance contract terms and conditions, the date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

6. Details of any collection charges added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

7. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said charges were levied.

8. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of our data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998.

9. A list of third parties to whom you have disclosed our personal data including Credit Reference Agencies and, a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed, the reason for this disclosure.

10. Copies of any statement of account for the agreement from its inception.

11. Where any previous information or records held have been deleted or disposed of, the methods used to do so, including dates, certificates or references confirming details of destruction. Where you are unable to provide such certificates, lease provide a declaration signed by an authorised officer of your company, confirming the dates and methods of destruction of this data, and the reason for the destruction.

12. Full hard copy print outs of our personal and financial information, held in a digital, magnetic or any other format which is held in any archives, backups or other storage systems/devices/locations.

13. Full copies of transcripts of any correspondence in postal, e-mail or any other format which you have entered into with any individual, organisation or third party which contains my personal or financial, or which pertains to us.

14. Details of any third parties which have an interest in our account.

15. Full details of any securitisations that any of our account(s) have or involved in

16. Any other information that you hold with regards to us and/or our account.

17. A complete list of all transactions or statements relating to all our account and applications made to and with your organisation.

 

Enclosed is the statutory maximum fee for this request of £10.

You have 40 days in which to comply. If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to our identity please let us know by return.

 

However please note that the above address is the one which you have recently used to make any and all communications with us with regards to our private business, which you have hitherto found acceptable.

 

IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO DEAL WITH THIS REQUEST, YOU SHOULD IMMEDIATELY FORWARD IT TO THE PERSON WITHIN YOUR ORGANISTAION REPONSIBLE FOR DATA PROTECTION COMPLIANCE.

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...