Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, the vehicle went to Audi Chingford on Thursday 13th May. I did state beforehand that I only wanted a diagnostic. The technician out of courtesy opened the drain letting huge deposits of water escape the seals. Video evidence was provided via AUDI cam. The link for the audi cam has been forwarded to BMW and Motonovo. I spoke to branch manager explained the situation and he stated he would sent me an email outlining the issue. Audi state this is not really an issue and more of a design flaw. However, the seals still have water ingress. I purchased the vehicle with £0 deposit on a 60 months HP plan for £520.00. The vehicle total was £21000. I did not go for any extended warranty. I live almost 70 miles away from the aftersales centre in Peterborough. I have previously uploaded the document I forwarded to BMW however it was in word format. I have had to buy a new tyre almost three days after purchasing vehicle. BMW still have not compensated me for the v62 cost as they said they would. 
    • I would suggest that you stop trying to rely on legal theory – as you understand it. Firstly, because we are dealing with practical/pragmatic situations and at a low value level where these arguments tend not to work. Secondly, because you clearly have misunderstood the assessment of quantum where there are breaches of obligations. The formula that you have cited above is the method of loss calculation in torts. In contract it is entirely different. The law of obligations generally attempts to remedy the breach. This means that in tort, damages seek to put you into the position you would have been in had the breach not occurred. In other words it returns you to your starting position – point zero. Contract damages attend put you into the position that you would have been had the breach not occurred but this is not your starting position, contract damages assume that the agreement in dispute had actually been carried out. This puts you into your final position. You sold an item for £XXX. Your expectation was that you your item would be correctly delivered and that you would be the beneficiary of £XXX. Your expectation loss is the amount that you sold the item for and that is all you are entitled to recover. If you want, you can try to sue for the larger sum – and we will help you. But if they ask for evidence of the value of the item as it was sold then I can almost guarantee that either you will be obliged to settle for the lesser sum – or else a judge will give you judgement but for the lesser sum. This will put you to the position that you would have been had there been no breach of contract. I understand from you now that when you dispatch the item you declared the retail cost to you and not your expected benefit of £XXX. To claim for the retail value in the circumstances would offend the rules relating to betterment. If you want to do it then we will help you – but don't be surprised if you take a tumble.  
    • I was caught speeding 3 times in the same week, on the same road. All times were 8-12mph higher than the limit. I was offered the course for the first offense and I now need to accept the other 2 offenses. I just want to be ready for what might come. Will I get the £100 fine and 3 points for each of them or do I face something more severe?  These are my only offenses in 8 years of driving.
    • I'll get my letter drafted this evening. Its an item I sold, which I'm also concerned about, as whilst I don't have my original purchase receipt (the best I have is my credit card statement showing a purchase from Car Audio Centre), I do unfortunately have the eBay listing where I sold it for much less. But as I said before this is now a question of compensation: true compensation would seek to put me back into the position I was in before the loss ie: that title would remain with me until my buyer has accepted this, and so compensation should be that which would be needed to replace the lost item. But in the world of instant electronic payment, it could be argued that as I had already been paid, the title to the goods had already transferred, and I was required to refund the buyer after the loss. And so, despite my declared value being the retail price - that which is needed to return me to my pre-sales position, the compensatory value should be the value I sold it for, which being a second-hand item from a private seller is lower. I still believe that I should be claiming for the item's full value, rather than how much I sold it for, as this is the same for insurance: we don't insure the value we paid, but rather the value of the item to put us back into the position we would be in if we ever needed to claim. Its for the loss adjuster to argue the toss
    • amusing that 'bad economic judgement on behalf of prior party ISN'T a major reason to wingers to move to deform yet immigration is, where record levels of such has been driven by the right wings terrible brexit and the later incompetent dog whistle 'proposals largely driven to whistle to the right wingnuts Just seems to confirm the are clueless numpties 'wetting their own shoes   Has farage bought a property in Clacton yet?   yet concern for the NHS is listed as a major issue even by those saying they are moving to deform  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

A Hello and plea for help


crycol
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5336 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone - am new to here and so happy to be so as everyone appears to be helpful

 

I am desperate.

The sob story first. 69 years old. Unable to work after heart surgery, wife also who has advanced athritis and has a series of operations ahead of her.

 

Income , joint around £14,000 - so little left to pay the sharks.

 

The problem. When had heart attack 2 years ago had bank overdraft facility for £20,000.

I had signed a guarantee some 6 years previously in dubious circumstances

The bank was just over the road, manager came over said you are overdrawn so need to sign a formal guarantee to let the overdraft continue. Guarantee said advice should be taken - bank manager said dont worry about that, just sign it, sure it will be ok . Did so and didnt think another thing about it. No Waiver form form was offered or signed.

 

Didint think any more about it.

Sometimes bank owed me money, sometimes overdraft facility used.

 

When I had heart attcak, my wife had to take over running of business (£1.2milliont/o) but as I I was engineman, stoker and guard, it soon began falling apart.

She told manager of situation and had meeting with him. The facility continued and indeed they let it go over!. Another meeting was arranged but the manager did not turn up.

When I was well enough to know about the circumstances it was clear the biz.could not carry on and we appointed a receiver to arrange voluntary liquidation, which was done very quickly.

 

Bank did not attend creditors meeting. (No one attented creditors meeting)

 

10 months later bank wrote asking for money. I said couldnt pay

a further 4 months recovery dept wrote.

I filled in all forms (incidentally I have no meaningful assetts, the house belongs to my wife who boughtit, pays rates and utilities on it - we married after the properties purchase - I havnt owned a property for 16 years) giving income aand expenditure.

I offered without prejudice a full and final payment of £2.000 and at same time requested documentation and time trail on the guarantees signing.

A month later, they rejected the offer but did not provide paperwork

I phoned, repeated offer, rejected again, and verbally requested the paperwork. Said it would be with me in 21 days

 

Nothing, so 42 days later sent a letter that as I had not heard from them considered the matter closed

 

Now, ist November, MONTHS later had letter from Apex debt collectors demanding money

Have verbally related facts to them stressing I had not admitted the debt as it was signed for under duress with no time give for outside advice and without a waiver being signed.

Also that once the bank had been advised of my circumstances they should have stopped the facility - especially as at one stage the account was in credit!

 

Apex have said, if I pay the £50 that shows my goodwill

and would be advantageous as to my intentions

 

Still no paperwork

 

If I pay the £50, am I then admitting the debt even though I say without prjudice

Apex claim I have admitted the debt by making an offer to pay" £2000 in full and final settlement without prejudice to my contesting the validity of the claim"

 

Frankly, if the take me to court, there is no blood to come out of the stone, bankruptcy would be an inconvenience but not a disaster as it would then clear off some credit card debts (which seperate to the guarntor claim are not a particular problem) and I dont need to borrow money.

 

Should I pay the £50

Should I make another offer (I withdrew the last when it was not accepted

Should I call their bluff and let them take it as far as they want

 

Any advice would be gratefully received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for a second post. But it is important to know that my wife was not a director of the Company and had not been asked my me to talk to the bank as my agent - indeed, it was not until a few months ago that I knew she had done so

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you PGH

 

The request as you put it not sent.

I requested - copies of any correspondence, the date the guarantor form was submitted to me, and the daye it was received back

 

Essentialy, they will be unable to supply it as it was brought over andtaken back by hand in the space of 15 minutes

 

In considering this, will sending a forma Subject Access Request help?

Thank you again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to both of you.

 

I did sign the guarantor form and they have produced a copy.

 

What they have NOT done is provide a timeline.

Essentially the bankman said sign here or no overdraft. As there were cheques waiting to be paid, I signed. The agreement advised to take professional advice, but I was urged to sign there and then "as a formality"

 

My opinion is that as they did not offer a waiver - I doubt if they had them in those days - and I was not given time to take advice, I was under duress.

 

To "prove " this, is why I have asked for

 

any covering correspondence - I dont believe there is any

Date the agreement was sent to me

date I returned it

 

I would like to think that if they cannot do either of these things my claim of duress will stand up

 

Hopefully......

 

But am really nervous about sending APEX even 50p never mind £50 as I feel they would claim that is an admission of the debt.

 

I would still pay the £2,000 I offered as full and final, without prejudice and all that, just to get it sorted - with my health as it is I have little enough time left, and while my wife had no direct involvement in it, and I have no share in the property while she is alive, should, as likely, I predecease her ( as well as health issues she is 10 years younger and from a long living family) I do not want her being pressurised by these people. Life will be tough enough for her without all that

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have posted my problem elsewhere - but can't find it!

 

This is not the problem but related to it.

 

HSBC have ignored correspondence and requests for information sent to them over 6 months ago (2 written, 1 verbal)

 

Have had letter from Apex saying I have to deal with them and pay them money, give statement of affairs etc

 

But HSBC have not told me they have passed the matter to Apex.

 

Do I have to talk to Apex, ignore them, politely tell them I need to see their mandate from HSBC or request same from HSBC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, crycol.

 

I have merged both your threads, Like DebT says, to find your threads ect, click on User CP, top left above your 1st post.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Edited by maroondevo52
Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all! Will try to get grips with the navigation.

 

Did not send by recorded delivery, but first request was included in letter, part of which was actioned, but not that part. So they cannot deny receiving that request

 

The verbal request was again a follow up to their reply and when subject raised, That is when I was told the paperwork requested would take 21 days

 

My follow up was sent my normal post, but I did prepare it on my P.C. using word, so I do have a copy on the hard drive as well as a paper copy.

 

Their correspondent is India based I believe, although the correspondence adress is Canary Wharf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't send anything to india that has your personal details on, that is what bit of advice I would give you, if their trading in the UK they'll have a UK office etc.

 

You have to send what you have by recorded delivery, it creates a papertrail that validates that you're in contact with them.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, Deb.

As stated in my previous post, while it ends up in India I send it to the correspondence address at Canry Wharf (HSBC H.O.London)

 

I will ensure anything elsr goes recorded.

 

But do I need to reply to the DCA - Apex. Should I pay them the £50 goodwill, even though I wont admit the debt as it was under duress, should I say I will not speak to them until HSBC says I should, and even if HSBC says so, can I just ignore them and write to HSBC instead

 

Are Apex entitled to have from me a statement of affairs

 

HSBC have not advised either that they have passed it to Apex for collection or that they have sold the debt on.

 

Apex are suggesting dire consequences if I do not respond in 5 days (from two days ago) on the other hand the "Good Cop" there says if I provide the information they will be able to arrange a speedy settlement

 

I reckon HSBC know they are on dodgy ground (see first post) and are trying the DCA route to frighten me.

But never having been in a situation like this before I really am a lost sheep and know doing the wrong thing at this stage could have horrible consequences

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not pay APEX their 'goodwill gesture' at all and as has been stated here several times, send Apex a CCA request...that ini itself will put a halt to their collection activities until they can produce one and even then it may not be enforceable.

 

I would also send a SARS request to the bank which if/when produced should help you at least get to grips with any signatures or bank charges that may have been levied when they shouldn't etc.

 

As for the Liquidation, one assumes it wasn't a LTD company as this would give you some amount of protection against the bank.

 

I think you should also consider taking seperate legal advice on the guarantor aspect of your problem, it seems a little complicated but essentially it would be your word against your bank managers re the signing of any documents, it may be that when pressed the bank might not be able to produce the bank manager?

 

You own no property and I guess you have little in the way of assets that are in your name so bankruptcy as you say may be an option.

 

They can't have what you haven't got..

 

As for APEX, they are a DCA and have zero entitlement to your 'statement of affairs', they can ask until they're blue in the teeth but they are not entitled to it.

 

Send Apex the cca, costs a £1, use a postal order, don't sign the letter, print your name and send it recorded delivery and then check the royal mail website a few days later and take a screenshot of the 'proof of delivery. They have 12 days + 2 to provide the cca, after that the account is in dispute and no money can be requested by them and nothing has to be offered to them by you. (it is ultimately your choice if you want to pay them)

 

At the same time as this send the bank a SARS request, costs £10 ,same drill with signature and recorded delivery. They have 40 days to comply.

I would send postal orders and not sign them etc.

 

When/if you get your CCA ,come back here and post the document up so others can see it, it may be that it's unenforceable...Be sure to remove your personal details when posting it up

 

CCA can be found here..... edit accordingly

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/581-cca-request-letter

 

SARS can be found here ..... edit accordingly.

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/576-subject-access-request-debt-a-dca

 

The general rule of thumb is the DCA gets the cca request, the original creditor the SARS'S

 

What sounds a little out of the box is the £50 'goodwill' gesture that APEX want you to make, sounds like they're trying to get you to commit for whatever reason etc...ignore their rubbish pleas.

 

The people here can help you thorough, DCA's play on naivety and trade on ignorance, CAG helps redress the balance.

 

It's important to remember that you're not alone, plenty of people are in just such a postion as you (myself included) so try not

to get to out of shape and at 69 you should be taking things easy and enjoying your cocoa *lol* sorry pun fully intended.

Edited by Deb T
  • Haha 1

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Deb T - you are an angel, yopur trouble in replying is much appreciated.

I am not confrontional by nature, my inclination is always to negotiate but am out of my comfort zone here as these people are clearly just after the money and their rake off, with the bank acting badlyfrom the start right through to now where they are not responding either to my requests nor letting me know what action is being taken.

 

 

It was a Ltd Co, so although they negligently allowed the overdraft to go WELL over the £20,000 they got me to guarantee all those years ago, they can only claim that part of it.

 

We will see- and I will certainly let you know what is happening

 

Thank you again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...