Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyds Tsb


consort
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6484 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

First and foremost can anyone help? We are not understanding via FAQ what we are supposed to be doing. So far we have received from the bank a full list of every single charge from the last six years, worked out how much we think they owe us and have sent a preliminary 14 day notice for our money back. We didn't enclose a schedule of charges because we were not exactly sure what that meant. Q1. Is this the full list of dates and charges from the last six years that we feel are illegal charges?

 

Within the fourteen days of the prelim letter LTSB replied basically telling us that all the overdraft etc charges were legal, politely told told us that we should have ran our bank account better and that the letter is the banks final response and to refer our complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service.

Q2. Have we made a hash of this already? And what do we do next?

 

Confused and frustrated

Consort

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooops I've just posted pretty much the same thread. I've just rec'd the same letter back from LTSB and I am unsure of what to do next also. Also getting confused by the FAQ's.

 

Sorry not helping just letting you know I'm in the same boat.

 

Amie:sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi consort, welcome.

 

Ok, question 1, yes a schedule of charges is a list of the dates, amounts and the banks reason for the charge (returned DD, excess o/d)

 

Question 2, no you have not messed up at all, you wait the full 14 days and issue letter before action and include a scedule of charges.

 

The charges are unlawful, not illegal. All I would suggest you do is read again the FAQ and others threads, there will be all the information you require and its best to have a good understanding of what needs done, otherwise the bank could pick up on the fact you are not fully informed.

 

Good luck

o0oLiamBeeo0o.

Prelim Req sent 12 June 2006,

LBA sent 26 June 2006,

Confirmation of court action sent 24 July 2006,

Court return date 20 October 2006 - LTSB did not reply,

Court hearing date 27 October 2006 - Decree granted in my favour,

Recall of decree recieved 16 November 2006,

1 December 2006 assigned as recall of decree,

26 January 2007 assigned for full proof hearing,

16 January 2007 1st offer recieved and declined,

23 January 2007 2nd offer accepted, awaiting monies to hit bank account

 

All advice & opinions of o0oLiamBeeo0o are personal opinions, if in doubt seek advice from a qualified professional !!

 

vvv My Thread vvv

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

I sent out my prelim and letter before action and received exactly the same letters - its all pretty standard stuff. Don't expect the bank to cave in now; they will play for time for as long as possible and hold on to your cash.

 

Keep a note of all the correspondance and stick to the timeline. They will keep rejecting you and I've no doubt you'll need to file a claim before they even start to take you seriously.

 

If you read through the posts you will see eveyone else has been fobbed off with the same letters and they are nothing to worry about. Stick to the templates and you'll be fine!

11/07/2006 - First request sent

21/07/2006 - Standard 'sod off' reply from Lloyds TSB

25/07/2006 - Letter before action sent

01/08/2006 - Second standard 'sod off' reply from Lloyds TSB

03/08/2006 - Claim started through moneyclaim for sum of £1756.26

04/08/2006 - Claim issued by moneyclaim

09/08/2006 - Claim served by moneyclaim

06/09/2006 - Defence entered

25/09/2006 - AQ returned (no Lloyds AQ yet)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Amie,

 

I do not see any reason why you cannot continue, after all it is your timeline.

 

I had a short delay of about 2 weeks when LBA expired but I still filed with court, if it was the other way around and you didnt wait the full 14 days then that would be different, but no I would say go ahead.

 

Regards

o0oLiamBeeo0o

Prelim Req sent 12 June 2006,

LBA sent 26 June 2006,

Confirmation of court action sent 24 July 2006,

Court return date 20 October 2006 - LTSB did not reply,

Court hearing date 27 October 2006 - Decree granted in my favour,

Recall of decree recieved 16 November 2006,

1 December 2006 assigned as recall of decree,

26 January 2007 assigned for full proof hearing,

16 January 2007 1st offer recieved and declined,

23 January 2007 2nd offer accepted, awaiting monies to hit bank account

 

All advice & opinions of o0oLiamBeeo0o are personal opinions, if in doubt seek advice from a qualified professional !!

 

vvv My Thread vvv

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Amie,

 

Could you clarify which letter you have got to; prelim or letter before action.

 

The deadlines in the letters are deadlines set by you for the banks to respond. Once the 14 days are up you can then move to the next step in the process. You have 6 years from the date of the charge to make your claim; the 14 days is just so the bank can't drag the matter on forever.

 

Matt

11/07/2006 - First request sent

21/07/2006 - Standard 'sod off' reply from Lloyds TSB

25/07/2006 - Letter before action sent

01/08/2006 - Second standard 'sod off' reply from Lloyds TSB

03/08/2006 - Claim started through moneyclaim for sum of £1756.26

04/08/2006 - Claim issued by moneyclaim

09/08/2006 - Claim served by moneyclaim

06/09/2006 - Defence entered

25/09/2006 - AQ returned (no Lloyds AQ yet)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry it is the prelim letter that I am up to...following this is it the LBA and this is when I complete the spreadsheet which calculates interest?? (actually just tried the spreadsheet and cant get on for some reason??)

 

Thanks

amie

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have just been busy reading the FAQ again and are starting to get it! Our prelim letter 14 days notice ended today, although the bugger off letter came last week. we have copied and pasted the LBA. So tomorrows job will be an excel spread sheet with all unlawfull charges from last 6 years (£2282) and the LBA. Here we go again ready for the next bugger off letter! Then onto the next stage! LOOK OUT LTSB WE AIN'T GIVIN UP TILL YAV COFFED UP...........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like you've got it. Don't forget, do NOT include the 8% interest in your LBA. Leave this for moneyclaim if the claim gets that far.

 

The next letter I got was a "sorry but no.This is our final decision on the matter". Don't be surprised when this comes through. Since the bank stated they clearly didn't want to talk any further on the matter I didn't wait for the 14 days to expire - just fired off my moneyclaim the very next day.

 

Best of luck and keep with it!

 

Matt

11/07/2006 - First request sent

21/07/2006 - Standard 'sod off' reply from Lloyds TSB

25/07/2006 - Letter before action sent

01/08/2006 - Second standard 'sod off' reply from Lloyds TSB

03/08/2006 - Claim started through moneyclaim for sum of £1756.26

04/08/2006 - Claim issued by moneyclaim

09/08/2006 - Claim served by moneyclaim

06/09/2006 - Defence entered

25/09/2006 - AQ returned (no Lloyds AQ yet)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...