Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help Court action by Restons/MBNA – what should I do next?


Zak464
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5348 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all

 

I’ve been lurking around this forum for a long time trying to sort out various problems with several credit card companies. Mostly brought on by my business taking a nose dive during the credit crunch and MBNA raising my interest rate to 34.9% !!!!! :eek:

 

 

MBNA have decided to take me to court and I would appreciate any advice or pointers as to what my next steps should be.

 

Please forgive this very long first post but hopefully by giving all the background will help the CAG collective better provide ideas for what action I should take next.

 

I requested my CCA from MBNA back in Feb 09 (Application is from Jan 2004) – MBNA missed the deadline and I stopped making payments as the account was placed in dispute.

 

After a reminder letter (from Me) I eventually received an illegible copy of an application form with my signature on it and some further illegible terms and conditions on the back of it. PDF ATTACHED – not much to link these documents together as far as I can tell – the ref numbers on the bottom of each appear to be different although it is difficult to be sure as most of the small print/terms on the document is very difficult to read (even with a magnifying glass – I did try!!)

 

I wrote back to MBNA saying that this was insufficient to satisfy my CCA request as the document provided was illegible.

 

I was then hounded by MBNA and their lackeys for about 6 months or so (most of which I ignored as I was/am confident that the account is legally in dispute).

 

In July I received a Default Notice from MBNA (PDF ATTACHED) – as far as I can tell this appears to be technically valid (I would appreciate someone confirming this if possible?) although is it true that the account being in dispute would invalidate the Default notice anyway? (I do not have the envelope the DN came in unfortunately).

 

In August 09 I received an LBA from Restons solicitors (PDF ATTACHED).

 

And then in September 09 I received an N1 claim form from Northampton CC Bulk processing centre (PDF Attached). I acknowledged service online contesting the claim in full.

 

I then wrote to Restons with a CPR31.14 request for a copy of a Legible credit agreement (knicked the letter from surface agents brilliant thread – getting them to reveal their particulars – thank you).

 

I waited for a couple of weeks to see if Restons would respond and then sent off a form N244 asking for an order from the court to extend time for me to prepare a defence and ordering Reston /MBNA to comply with my CPR31.14 Request and asking that if they didn’t the claim should be struck out.

 

Restons did respond (Day after I sent the N244 from by SD) – Doh! But they have provided an identical application/agreement form which is still mainly illegible.

 

Thanks to anyone who has stuck with this post so far it is much appreciated!

 

I am slightly at a loss for what to do next and any pointers/advice would be very gratefully received.

 

Do I still need to file a defence (embarrassed defence?) given I have posted the N244 form? – if so the 28days expires on the 23rd Oct so I do need to get cracking on this if I do need to do it.

 

Is Restons sending the same (illegible) document enough to satisfy my CPR31.14 request?

 

Is there anything else I should be doing or working on at this stage?

 

I am perfectly willing to go to court to defend myself (very nervous about doing it obviously) but I refuse to be bullied into submission by MBNA who frankly (from my experience and reading the experiences of others) seem to have no regard for the law and are nothing more than legitimised loan sharks!

 

I would be extremely grateful for any comments or advice from other CAG members

 

Thanks Zak464.

MBNA CCA.pdf

MBNA Default Notice.pdf

Reston LBA.pdf

N1 Form & POC.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can you supply the dates for the Default Notice as you've blanked out the date of the Default notice and the date to remedy.

 

Did you keep the envelope the DN was sent in ?

 

As to Restons supplying the same CCA as MBNA, then this is what they will go to Court with.

 

You cannot use an embarrassed defence if Restons have supplied the documents in response to your CPR 31 request.

 

Oh, and welcome to CAG !!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Supasnooper

 

The date on the DN is 28th July & the date remedy is 14th August.

Didnt keep the envelope it came in sadly.

 

Am i correct in thinking that if they sent it second class it is invalid but ok if it was sent 1st class?

 

Should I base my defence around the fact that the agreement is unreadable

 

Thanks

Zak.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zak464 I am popping on in to say how brilliant I think you have done so far in taking this as far as you have already, you have been so proactive with your research so far its amazing. There is certainly only one way this can keep going now with the caggers on board now too & thats up.......

 

I have this twosome on me & went to court in July, still ongoing though but perserverence & having all the caggers onboard has proved a great success so far.

 

We look forward to your further postings & no doubt there will be some expert advice along soon to chcek on your DN for definite.......;)

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The date on the DN is 28th July & the date remedy is 14th August.

Didnt keep the envelope it came in sadly.

 

Am i correct in thinking that if they sent it second class it is invalid but ok if it was sent 1st class?

 

 

Yes you are correct about the invalidity.

MBNA do insist on sending out their DN's by UKMail, which is not a first class service.

You will have to put them to strict proof of the method of postage.

Edited by supasnooper

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou Mydogsawestie those are very kind words and much appreciated.

 

I was very lucky to have found this forum before I got into trouble with the credit sharks and so had some idea what to expect when I went down the CCA route.

 

Similarly I took Lloyds to court several years ago to get back bank charges they had applied to my girlfriends account (we won too :D) so the threats of court action etc have not been quite as frightening as they would have hoped!

 

All that said, it is a huge relief to have other CAGers looking at my claim and giving me feedback so thanks once again (I will check out your thread with interest and wish you the best of luck too:-))

 

Thanks too Supasnooper - great ammo for my defence cheers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Supasnooper

 

I did send SAR request around the time I CCA'd MBNA. (Should have mentioned in my opening post).

 

There is a comms log included in the response (along with transaction details and the same illegible application/agreement I got for my CCA request).

 

Comms log only goes upto Feb 09 - what information should I be looking for in it? or do I need to SAR them again to get comms log to date? To be honest I had forgotten about getting this information as I couldnt understand most of it :confused: If you or someone else could explain what i need from it I would be very grateful.

 

Cheers

Zak464

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...