Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Visiting scotland I came across a car park at The Falls of Shin operated by Civil Enforcement Limited. The car park requires visitors to pay using the awful Phone and Pay app or over the phone using an eqully terrible automated service. Their signs state a time limit of 10 minutes after arriving to pay, and both methods require needlessly lengthy registration process only for payment to be rejected when attempting to pay by both. The Cafe were able to offer us some assistance and register our vehicle so hopefully we sould avoid a fine but this seems like entrapment and would still stop us returning again. How is this legal without giving visitors the option to pay on site?
    • click the link. dx  
    • There are two things to immediately clarify. Firstly, why did court papers go to the wrong address?  In 99% of backdoor CCJ cases here the person moves and doesn't update the vehicle log book address.  Or they move and they don't inform the parties who they are in legal dispute with of the new address.  Does either of these apply to you? Secondly, given this has been going on for over three years without presumably any ill effects on you, how important is it for you to have a clean credit file?  I ask as, if you do absolutely nothing, the CCJ will disappear in April 2027.
    • Sorry to ask, but I know I had SB template on PC, but can't find it. Also any search for template\SB letter takes me back here.  Any help to get to SB letter would be appreciated. I know I used it on a car HP co that wouldn't honor my FCS refund and after 6 years came threatening ( or rather their DCA). Worked a treat. Thanks in advance
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Goldfish / Barclaycard Advice Please....


tommyd82
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5360 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have been looking on these forums for quite some time now about the Credit agreement letters and such like. Anyway... So I thought id give it a go with my Barclaycard which I have had for about 7 years which used to be a Goldfish card.

 

Letter 1 (19/09/09)

I sent Barclaycard a letter on the 19th Sepetember 2009 requesting my CCA as per the templates I have found on here, ive attached copies of these so you can see them. I got a response within a week for that letter, one containing my current terms and conditions and one giving me my balance and stating they have provided a copy of the executed agreement which they didnt supply.

 

My 1st Letter to Barclaycard: 1st Letter to Barclaycard

Barclaycards 1st Response A: Response A

Barclaycards 1st Response B: Response B

 

Letter 2 (07/10/09)

So I wrote another letter to them asking the same again basically explaining that I have previously requested it and they wrote back to me with a 3 page letter basically saying they dont have to send it to me as they can send me parts of the agreement and pick and chose essentially. They said if I write to them again they wont reply basically unless theres a damn good reason, have a read of the letter and you will see what I mean. See letter below that I sent followed by their reply.

 

My 2nd Letter to Barclaycard: 2nd Letter to Barclaycard

Barclaycards 2nd Response: Response to 2nd Letter

 

Telephone Call (14/10/09)

Today i rang Barclaycard and spoke to someone, explained how I had written into them twice and not received the document that I asked for, and asked this person to send it to me, so me made a note explaining that I would like a copy of the document bearing my signature and he sent it down to the letters team to send it to me, i asked him if he could say if they had a copy of it or not and he didnt know. So im waiting to see what comes from this, but I doubt anything will.

 

Please Help...

I am a little puzzled as to what to do now, do I send them a letter asking for it under freedom of information or something like that, or do I go down the Civil Proceedings act and try and get it that way? I have a sneaking suspicision that they dont have it, I dont want to risk them taking it from my bank account etc. I have two business credit cards with Barclaycard, and business and personal accounts with Barclays. So I dont want to rock the boat too much.

 

Thanks for any help :-)

Edited by tommyd82
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be tempted to send them Scots letter below & see what their response is;

Re: my request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

Thank you for your recent letter sent to me, the contents of which are noted. I appreciate your quick response to my original letter. However, the reply received by me does not fulfil your requirements under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The Act demands that I be supplied with a true copy of any properly executed credit agreement that exists in relation to the above account. I may ask for this on demand providing that a fee of £1.00 is paid. This fee was sent with my original letter.

 

My request remains outstanding. The items you sent in your reply, does not constitute a true copy of any credit agreement that may or may not have been signed by me on the opening of this account. It neither confirms that I am liable for any alleged debt to you, nor gives me any chance to evaluate whether any original agreement was ‘properly executed’.

 

I still require you to send me a true copy of the original credit agreement that you allege exists. As you will know, under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, a judge is not permitted to make any enforcement order unless the creditor can provide a true signed copy of the original credit agreement. This means that unless you can produce such an agreement, this alleged debt is not enforceable in law.

 

You had until XX/XX/2008 to provide me with the true copy I requested. You are now in default of my request. Any account I hold with you is now in legal dispute. Whilst the account remains in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for any payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you. Furthermore, whilst the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest on the account, nor make any further charges to the account. Additionally, you are not entitled to register any information on this account with any credit reference agency.

 

To register information with a credit reference agency, you must have written consent from the customer to collate and share such information. This consent is given in the form of a signed credit agreement, so until you produce such an agreement, you may not do this.

 

The requirement for consent to share data is a clear requirement of the Data Protection Act 1998. any such attempts to share my data without my consent will be met with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office

 

To sum up, I will not be making any further payments to you until you provide me with the document I have requested. Whilst you remain in default of my request, you are not permitted to take any action against this account. This includes adding further charges and passing any information to the credit reference agencies.

 

Should you not have any signed credit agreement in relation to this alleged debt, please confirm this in writing to me.

 

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Print name do not sign

 

**amend to suit your circumstances.**

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for this, ill give it a week to see if anything arises from my telephone call first then ill send them something like you have stated above which seems pretty good.

 

Im sure you are aware theres plenty of confusion on these forums etc, obviously if there is no signed CCA then theres no contract etc etc, are they legally obliged to send me the signed copy as in the letter they sent to me it appears they have worked around it by stating they can send me, well pretty much nothing if they like.

 

Surely they have to send it to you.... right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, ive just had a look at what the Consumer Credit Regulations 1983 secion 3.2 states as per the 2nd letter i received back and it says:

 

(2) Where any information about financial and related particulars set out in paragraphs 5 and 6 of Schedule 3 to these Regulations cannot be exactly ascertained by the owner, estimated information based on such assumptions as the owner may reasonably make in all the circumstances of the case and an indication of the ssumptions made shall be included in documents embodying regulated consumer hire agreements.

If you look at what section 5 and 6 are, they refer to signatures etc, so my understanding of this is that if they cannot find it, they dont have to give it to me. But equally, if they have not got it, there is no contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tommy,

 

BC will not send you the credit agreement in response to a CCA request.

 

Nor will they send it in response to CPR letters 1 and 2. You wil have to file an Application at court to pursue this route properly.

 

But you may have success with a complaint to the FOS. See Bones' thread here - morgan & stanley /barclaycard

 

Looks like Bones agreement is enforceable but legibility remains an issue. :-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, ill take a look at their thread, I cant see why they wont just give it to me, they probably havent got it (I HOPE!)

 

To get a court order to obtain it, surely thats going to end with the account being put into Dispute?

 

I asume that they will have to turn up at court with the papers, if they dont or cant produce it then, its quite a clean cut argument really.

 

Is getting a court order really the only option I have to find out if they have a copy of it or not?

Edited by tommyd82
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tommy, see my comments in red.

Thanks, ill take a look at their thread, I cant see why they wont just give it to me, they probably havent got it (I HOPE!) You can't assume this at all, as shown in Bones's thread. Just because they don't send you the agreement does not mean they don't have one.

 

To get a court order to obtain it, surely thats going to end with the account being put into Dispute? Have you read the CPR thread at Link No2 in my signature. This is a very different strategy, from the CCA request route, to obtain your credit agreement. "In Dispute" usually refers to where a bank fails to provide the agreement within the allowed time after a CCA request.

 

I asume that they will have to turn up at court with the papers, if they dont or cant produce it then, its quite a clean cut argument really. Read about the CPR strategy.

 

Is getting a court order really the only option I have to find out if they have a copy of it or not? No, in my previous post, you'll see I suggest the possibility of complaining to the FOS, to see if their intervention forces the bank to produce the agreement.

 

Have a read of as many threads as you can, particularly in the BC forum. :)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...