Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well done with the photo. Of course the signage is insufficient.  PPM are not interested in competent management of a car park, they are interested in catching drivers out so they can issue their PCNs. For a start, according to their trade associations' Codes of Practice, they are supposed to have signage at the entrance. Any e-mail reply from the company and whether they will/won't/can/can't get the invoice cancelled?    
    • I will annotate the message I sent for the forum.  Sorry, didn't see this straight away...
    • I went back to the area, this photo is taken on entry. My vehicle was parked in the first space on the left.    Would you say there is sufficient signage ? It’s different to the street view as one sign is missing. The sign nearest to where I parked is 2.23m above ground! So even if the car had been reversed parked in front of it, I don’t think it could be seen. PCN PPM.pdf
    • Thank you. I expect that @dx100uk will be along soon to give advice. Meanwhile, I really wonder whether the default date – as being the starting point of the six years – something which has been decided in law. It has always seemed to me to be extremely unfair. According to the limitation act, the six year period begins from the date on which the cause of action accrued. This normally means that the breach of contract occurred. Section 6 of the limitation act says that in terms of loans, the cause of action begins on the date that the debt was "demanded". Over the past two years this has come to mean the date that the default notice was issued – but I have to say I don't find that very satisfactory. If you received demands for payment before then then I don't see why section 6 shouldn't refer to that date. Did you not receive any correspondence at all in 2017/2018? What was the value of the original loan – and how much you pay off? I see that there was some kind of instalment agreement. Tell us about that. See what my colleague @dx100uk says but anyway, if I were you I would send off an SAR immediately both to the claimant and also to the original creditor. It costs you nothing. There is no downside. Get in the post straightaway with some kind of utility bill establishing your identity. You can even include a copy of the claim form as well as proof of your identity
    • £749.69 court fee £70 legal fee £70 total £889.68 MyJar TM.pdf
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Landlord withholding deposit??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6492 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

I am wondering if someone can give me some good advice, My Girlfriend and 4 housemates moved out of their shared accomodation on 30th June 2006 because it was the end of their contract, they were told they would get back their deposit subject to deductions and all bills being paid, the landlord contacted them to tell them of some small deductions which were accepted and all bills have now been paid..... 4 weeks later still no deposit, the girls contacted the landlord to find out why? He says he needs a letter from Npower addressed to him stating that the bills are Paid (which they are) Npower say they dont do this but he is welcome to phone them to find out, He has point blank refused this saying he is t busy and why should he take time from his schedule, he has been unscrupulous from the start but this takes the cake, where do the Girls stand legally? All bills have been paid and the contracts have been signed over to the new tenants, The landlord must know the bills have been paid and is just playing silly buggers, whats the best way to approach this to get it sorted quickly and also make him know not to try it on with others

 

Thanks for any help

 

Regards

 

Tristan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all!

 

Tristan,in reply to your posting and in my opinion:

 

1.The landlord can deduct reasonable justified amounts from a deposit as that is the whole objective of giving the ladlord the deposit in the first place.

This is so that the

2.As long as the bills were never in the landlord's name during the tenancy he would have nothing to worry about.He is either one of two things very wary about the bills or trying to use them as an exuse to delay or repay less amount of the deposit further down the line.

 

3.A good landlord would not whinge about contacting Npower - all he would need would be the "Final Reading" from your girlfriend and her friends.This is so that the "Final Bill" can be issued for them.Any other usage after that would either be his or the new tenants responsibility.

 

4.Finally,I think this landlord needs his a** kicked,so send him a Letter before Action(template in library) and allow him up to 1 month to cough up and if he doesn't -SUE! It is as simple as that!

 

Read through the other postings and threads associated with deposit disputes within the Landlord and Tenant section on this forum.

 

I hope you find this information useful.

 

If you need any help or have a question,just ask.

 

Keep us posted.

 

All the best!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just a quick update, the landlord now claims he has sent the deposit back, HOWEVER he has sent ONE cheque to one of the housemates rather then sending the people back their cheques individually, I really think he is just doing this because he is a lazy B******d!!!!!

 

Everyone paid their deposits seperately so surely they should get them back seperately, I dont actually know if he has done anything wrong?? But this could bring with it a multitude of problems:- For instance he doesnt even know if the people involved are in contact or even get on but he has sent ALL the money to one person- Im really angry about this and want to know if he has done anything wrong because the guy is basically a very bad landlord and I want people to know so others dont have to suffer

 

Any advice is greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly for your girlfriend this is pretty much standard practise to return the deposit to one of the tenants in full. Regardless of how many tenants there are and how they paid originally. The tenancy is probably Joint and Several and the deposit shown on the agreement will be the whole amount due. It is down to all the tenants in the household to discuss what proportion belongs to them with each other.

 

If a landlord or agent agrees to pay each individual their share, this creates further delays in getting all tenants to agree in writing what their share is and what deductions they are responsible for.

 

Sorry it's not the answer you are looking for. Your girlfriend needs to get onto her housemates and failing that issue a small claim against the person who has the monies to get her share returned.

 

 

M

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...