Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bought a Used Ford KA 4 Days Ago


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5392 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I Bought a Ford Ka at a reputable garage and it came with 1 month parts and labour warranty as part of package.

 

i got the car home on monday after paying cash upfront and i was showing it to my mum and was opening and closing it etc as too use central locking as my old car was a wrecker without central locking or power steering and it was a novelty.

 

i went out to the car later that night to go to the shops and noticed the central locking was not working due to classes and my job today thursday(4 days later) is first day i have managed to phone them and i was shocked with what i heard, the man at the service station bit told me i was not covered only serious faults where and he would have a word with salesman and phone me back,

 

i got a phone call back about 5 minutes later with the man question if my car ever actually had central locking which him and the man who sold me it seemed to think it would not have. im 99% sure it had central locking and so is my mum who i was showing it off to is as well(after the phone call small amount if doubt creeping in). i looked up the original poster advertising the car(which i am still in possession of) which was sitting on dashboard for potential costumers too see it was also the sheet the salesman took out and used when telling me the cars good points to sell it and it has central locking listed as a feature.

 

i have to take the car in on monday and they will have a look at it and will fix it at my own expence, but i am wandering if it turns out the car does not have central locking i want to know what my rights are? two features my car had to have was central locking and power steering as it is things that were worst about my other car and i would not have bought the car had i known it didnt have it!

 

i go back on monday and would like to go armed with information as too not get brushed off by the salesman using the mechanic as his tool to fob me off and cheat me.

 

any help would or advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We need a jokes section to put posting like this into.

 

will fix it at my own expence

 

Do not pay for it, it is their responsibility. The warranty is just a nicety that is used to help sell the car, it is of no real value. What is of tremendous value however, is the sale of goods act.

 

The car is not of satisfactory quality if it was not pointed out to you that the central locking is not working. If you have any problems and would rather not argue with them, then you can pay saying 'I am paying under protest'. You can then mention the sale of goods act and that you will be reclaiming the cost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are denying the car even has central locking, i mean i have no leverage (even using sale of goods act) to get them to fix the problem if they say there is not one!!!!

 

i am looking more for information on the mis-selling side as i see it as my most viable option for leverage to get something sorted out. as i said in first post print out advert left on dashboard advertised it as having central locking and its the fact sheet the salesman got his information from when encouraging me to purchase it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the year and level of Ka, does it have bumpers coloured the same as the car, what radio is fitted? Only the base Ka's did not have it.

 

Frankly, if you demonstrated it to your mum then it sholud still be there. All Ka's had power steering. Let us know what year it is and I'll tell you exactly what it should have and what to look for as well.

 

Perhaps an easy solution is to take a copy of the ad with a Ka load of females dressed to the nines looking mean and demanding it's put right or you'll exercise your rights!!

 

Irrespective of the car problem I think you will get what is required as there is nothing so terrifying as a scene like this!!!

 

SOGA will protect you but only for so long.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...