Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS polled FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the and the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

claim from solicitor for sevices renderd


will lliw
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5392 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks, I desperatley need help with this one if anybody out there could assist. Last year I sought the help of a solicitor and then due to sikness could not afford to pay the invoice of £250, unfortunatley I have just recieved a county court claim when im weeks away from beeing able to pay these people off having returned to work recently! I am desperatley keen to avoid a CCJ against me and so would appreciate any guidance on how I could aproach this. I only have a few days left to decide wether to defend or accept. I would love to strike a deal but not sure how to go about this or even if a claim can be withdrawn in this way or if the claimant even would lol.....

 

Particulars of claim...

 

"Payment of unpaid invoice for services rendered by the claimant to the defendant to the defendants order full particulars of which have been supplied by the claimant to the defendant and invoiced as follows:-

 

Invoice No. xxxxx Dated xx/4/09 £250"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that the best thing you can do is to call the solicitors on the telephone, explain the situation to them, tell them that you are just now getting back on your feet as you are finally returning to workand can they give you a few weeks -- two months for instance -- to pay before proceeding with the claim. Make sure that you ask for a reasonable period of time to pay so that you can actually keep the commitment. If you asked for too short a time -- one month for instance -- and you then break your promise, you will get no further leniency from them.

 

Tell them that you are happy to write a letter agreeing to pay within the two months or whatever period you agree or else you will accept a judgement against you without question.

 

They would have to be fairly hardhearted not to accept a direct appeal which was fairly and honestly presented to them.

 

If they refuse, then the only thing I can suggest is that you try to delay things by putting in, first of all an acknowledgement and then a very brief defence simply saying that it is not admitted that you owe the money.

 

They should give you another two or three weeks. Then you will receive an allocation questionnaire. This will give you another two or three weeks. Don't submit the allocation questionnaire. After another two or three weeks you will receive an order from the court that unless you submit the allocation questionnaire judge will be entered against you. Have the money ready by that time and pay the solicitors and write to the court telling them that the matter is settled and that the case should be withdrawn.

 

The first way is the best way. The second way is the devious way but it will avoid you getting a County Court judgement.

 

However do make sure that you keep on taking it seriously. Don't treat the delay as an opportunity to put the matter on one side and find something else to spend the money on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help Bankfodder, I'm in this position now because I ignored it for to long so I will ignore no more!

I have tried calling the claimant several times over the last few days but it seems he is a very busy man! My 14 days of service are up next monday so ive decided to send an aknowledgment of service today by recorded post for my extra 14 days and then pay the claimant in full at the end of the month. When I pay at the end of the month will I have to pay the amount claimed plus court fee and costs to prevent a judgment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...