Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if the agreement was taken out jan 23, then she has not reached the 1/3rd mark so the car has not become protected goods under the consumer credit act.  this puts her in a very very vulnerable position regarding ever keeping the car....whereby once they have issued a default notice they can legally send a guy with a flatbed (though they are NOT BAILIFFS and have ZERO legal powers) to collect the car.  if the car is kept on the public highway then they can simply take it away and she will legally owe the whole stated amount on the agreement AND lose the car. if it's on private property i'e like a driveway, ok they shouldn't take it without her agreeing, but if they do, it's not really on but its better than a court case and an inevitable loss with the granting a return of goods order. are these 'health reasons' likely to resolve themselves in the very short term (like a couple of months?) and can she immediately begin working again ? i'e has she got a job or would have to find one?  answer the above and we'll try and help. but she looks to be between rock and a hard place . whatever happens she will still have to pay the loan off...car or no car....unless you can appeal to the finance company's better nature using health reasons to back off for xxx months.
    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Court Preparation


Tobes
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6473 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys - Yasmin, the Forerunner as she shall now henceforth be known :D Eek, and myself have all received court dates (mine's mid-September) so I thought it would be quite a good idea to discuss here what we're going to send to the court and to Egg, and maybe to discuss a gameplan or tactics or intentions or whatever...What do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think a going to court pack would be really useful. Thats the scary bit isnt it? I know most of what is needed is already here on the site, but bringing it together would be really good. I'm miles off court as yet, still waiting for my SAR to be fulfilled. but has anyone who has been to court or has settled and done their homework just in case, got anything to add?

 

Remember the 5p's :)

 

Preparation

Prevents

****

Poor

Performance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wish you all the luck with your court cases I used to work for egg lol and love reading all these posts - knowing them Im not surprised that they are going all the way they like to think themselves better than all the rest and they are not!! Im not quite sure why they think they are going to win when all the other institutions know they wont lol. All the very best for the court cases (if it even gets there) ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

im planning to rely on 1999 Consumer Credit Act (Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts) and 1977 Unfair Terms (contracts) Act.

im filing my MCOL with HSBC next week so anyother bits of legislation or arguments i can incorporate into it would be nice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Matheos95 - thanks for the encouragement :)

 

You wouldn't be able to confirm for us (obviously anonymously, without swearing on a bible lol) that their processes ARE automatic, would you? The letters they send - they appear to be unsigned, automatically produced letters, their charges appear to be added automatically by the system etc etc? :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant really part of the exit was a confidentially agreement - but lets put it like this do you think any large bank nowadays does any manual application of standard charges to ALOT of accounts - I DONT! The letters well I would guess that many CC companies have a list of standard letters by number in their system that they could request instantly via a computer system i would imagine there could be anything upto 50+ letters to choose from, but i would also guess that there is alot of manual letters that go out to!! sorry cant help much but still have my fingers crossed for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well ive written to hsbc telling them that actually their justification of the charges being set out in t&cs is erroneous because these charges are illegal under consumer legislation 1977 Unfair Terms (contracts) Act as well as 1999 Consumer Credit Act (Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts) and this is why the OFT is investigating and your customers are taking action against you. As a consumer I am protected by Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (UTCCRs) and it is under this legislation that I believe a court would rule in my favour.

the OFT website has a very useful section in there about what is an unfair charge and it clearly states that a punitive charge is an unfair charge.

overdarft charges are punitive becuase they dont reflect the cost of generating letter becuase as it has been said these things are done by automated systems.

as there is no clarification made on statements between what is a manual intervention and what is automated, the customer does not receive full transparant account of what they are being charged for.

i have also read that:

Under 1977 Unfair Terms (contracts) Act, the sheer fact that ALL banks make these charges makes this a breach of the act (the example given is exactly that)

i want to look into this and find out exactly how that works but it does make a convincing case doesnt it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tobes, Not long now.....Don't forget to include the O F T report, April 2006 Calculating fair default charges in credit card contracts. If you prepare properly and adhere to deadlines, even if they don't, it could prevent yet another adjournment.........????

Woolwich won in court/default removed Barclaycard Settled Halifax settled

Capital 1Settled GE Money Settled

Egg Settled-court action re.default 4th hearing!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might like to consider how much they charge for statements or letters that are not part of their obligation under the Data Protection Act.

 

Not sure if egg are trying that, but the other banks are saying that their system isnt a relevant filing system and its a real pain to gather the data (ive only had an acknowledgement of my S.A.R from egg so far). Hence 3 quid per month or similar.

 

But they charge 20 quid or so for automatic letters and charges, cleary weird since manual intervention to provide microfiche statements would be quite time consuming, according to the banks and therefore the charges should reflect a commerical rate based on the time and effort dont you think?

 

Not sure this coud be used with egg but im sure it would interest a judge for banks that do this.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

 

PS if you wan to see what i wrote check out Glenn vs Barclaycard, having re read it i would make some changes but then i always do that.

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

YW

 

It came to me when i got the letter from barclays saying how they didnt understand about smith vs lloydd or whatever its called.

 

I wrote and asked how they could justify theyre chagres bearing in ind the disparity between the effort of the two actions.

 

Wonder if anyone will read it at barclay card or it will end up in the 'not satisfied pile'!!

 

Like to be there if if they do just to hear what they say.

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tobes, Want any support in court? Know it's September ;-) . Just let me know!

Woolwich won in court/default removed Barclaycard Settled Halifax settled

Capital 1Settled GE Money Settled

Egg Settled-court action re.default 4th hearing!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...