Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Carshop TWG Warranty problems.. advice please..


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5344 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Evening all,

 

Having bought a car from the Carshop in Jan 08 with a TWG warranty policy, the car has broken down and TWG say it isn't covered.

 

I have drafted the letter below to send to the carshop. Please could somebody comment on it and let me know if its ok.

 

---

For the Attention of: Customer Services

FORMAL COMPLAINT

Vehicle: * – *.

Following a breakdown of the above mentioned vehicle it has been brought to my attention by TWG that the parts affected are not covered under the Motor Vehicle Warranty package that was purchased with the vehicle.

The affected parts are the No. 1 and No. 4 fuel injectors.

After having experienced fuel injector problems with the vehicle owned prior to this. * which was purchased with a warranty provided by * also supplied by the Carshop *, I was very specific in my request that the Motor Vehicle Warranty package for the *, must provide cover for the fuel injectors and other fuel system parts which the Carshop * confirmed it did.

I am now extremely distressed to find out from TWG that they will not cover the parts, as they state they are not listed in the policy schedule.

I am therefore of the opinion that the Motor Vehicle Warranty package has been mis-sold and I require this matter to be investigated as a formal complaint.

In the first instance, if I am not satisfied with your response, I will:

- Raise this matter with British Credit Trust as the credit provider under the Office of Fair Trading Equal Liability Guidance.

- Make a formal complaint to the Office of Fair Trading and The Financial Ombudsman Service regarding the mis-selling of the Motor Vehicle Warranty Package.

I hope that these steps will not be necessary and expect a prompt reply in this matter.

You due diligence is expected.

Yours Faithfully,

---

 

If you have any other questions or need any further information please let me know and I will reply as soon as.

 

Would like to get this sorted quickly as need the car back on the road so would like to fax the letter to them tomorrow.

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the problem with warranties. It's sold or implied that it covers everything and you have nothing to worry about. This is another practise that needs stamping out immediatly!!

 

When you buy a car you are entitled to a warranty. A used car for a period has to be covered by the dealer. However, the remainder is not actually a warranty but an insurance policy against the failure of a specific item listed the policy will cover. Therefore, if it's not a part listed then it ain't covered despite the fact it's sold as an all singing and dancing warranty.

 

It doesn't just end there with used cars though.

 

Buy a new car and block exemption rules mean you can have it serviced anywhere provided the parts are of equivalent standard. However the extended warranty asks you to accept this as this is an insurance policy and therefore becomes an insurance contract beteween you and the manufacturer.

 

You think you are buying a car with a XX year manufacturers warranty but in fact you are buying an insurance policy.

 

This is endemic in the trade and it's about time someone stood up to it. It's fundamentally wrong!!!

 

In your case, Injectors are now deemed to be wear and tear items so forget pursuing it. Don't take the dealers word about price either. Look and search and you'll get the injectors at a reasonable price.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Heliosuk,

 

I agree that the injectors could be found at a more reasonable price, the problem I have got is mapping them to the ECU, which unless the garage has the right kit they won't be able to do it. Hence stuck with the dealer.

Will do some ringing around tomorrow, but am seriously annoyed as this is the fourth set of injectors in 4 years. 1st on this car since jan 08 but the one before I had 3 sets in 2 years all under the warranty applicable to that car at the time. Hence my reason for specifically asking when the car was bought if they were covered. Still think should pursue for mis-selling of the policy but unsure of my chances.

 

Will have to have a think a bit more.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

What car is it and year plus current mileage. On HPCR engines, manufactuers are increasingly saying they are service items from around 60K miles. Might be something to do withn the extreme pressures they work under. Also is it a Delphi, Bosch or other system?

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is a bloke on the volvo forums he can help you out.

i will pm you the site address and do a post on there mention proplems with injectors and they will help you find a place also there is a bloke on there that works for a dealership and he gets you the parts with a hefty discount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Craig.

Will have a look if I can't get anywhere with causing a fuss over the warranty.

The local volve garage are a bit reluctant to do the work if I get the bits, but may be able to persuade them. If not need to find a local garage who can do the ECU mapping and compression tests.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Evening all,

 

Just a quick update.

 

After a fax to the credit provider today, they are willing to make a 'goodwill gesture' towards the costs..

 

Now just need to get the carshop to make a goodwill gesture which they say they won't do.

They are not very helpful, but still waiting for their official response.

 

Complaint to the FOS or FSA would cost them more than the offer I want them to make, so am thinking of sending them another letter about this.

 

On the matter of parts, have found a company who can do a repair to the injectors or replace them for lower costs than volvo offered, so looking more positive if I have to pay it myself.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Brief update.

 

After several letters and phone calls the car has now been repaired and collected.

Finance company paid approx. half and we paid the rest, after negotiating a 15% discount from the garage on top.

 

Thanks for all your input and assistance.

 

Regards

 

GhostDebt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like a good result but it does reinforce/highlight the problems of the "supposed" warranties given/sold with a used car. The OFT need to be clear about this in that a warranty is not the same as a mechanical breakdown/failure policy and that a garage needs to be clear on this when selling a car.

 

In fact the whole warranty system needs overhauling. For example, a turbo bearing goes pop after 40K miles but 5 years old. Full service history. Manufacturer say no but in reality supplier to manufacturer warrants part to 100K miles but warranty from supplier still exists for another 60K miles.

 

Something to think about peeps!!

 

This could be the reason why in some cases the manufacturer offers 100% goodwill but the labour to change isn't covered and gives a manufacturer the opportunity to back out of any obligation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...