Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I did as soon as i received the grade, i was on annual leave over December and my line manager was due to leave on the 15th December, i did not receive the review until i returned to work. SO i never had the opportunity to have a review. I challenged it straight away and raised a complaint to HR, who never responded to me,
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • 2 foot of sea level rise   The Thwaites Glacier — dubbed the “Doomsday” glacier because of the grave impacts for global sea level rise if it melts — is breaking down “much faster” than expected, according to a peer-reviewed study published on Monday in the academic journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Using satellite imagery, scientists determined that widespread contact between the glacier and warm ocean water is speeding up the melting process. The climate crisis is interrupting natural processes across large parts of the continent, according to the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition. The glacier, roughly the size of the United Kingdom, could cause global sea levels to rise more than two feet if it melts completely, according to the study. “Thwaites is the most unstable place in the Antarctic and contains the equivalent of 60 centimeters of sea level rise,” study co-author Christine Dow said in a statement. “The worry is that we are underestimating the speed that the glacier is changing, which would be devastating for coastal communities around the world,” she continued. Read the full story here.       or here ... from the India civil service currents affairs exam Doomsday glacier Antarctica‘s Thwaites Glacier, roughly the size of Britain, is a fast-moving glacier in West Antarctica. Because of the risk it faces — and poses — Thwaites is often called the Doomsday Glacier. Because of its size (1.9 lakh square km), it contains enough water to raise the sea level by more than half a metre. Thwaites’s melting already contributes 4% to global sea level rise each year. Thwaites are important for Antarctica as it slows the ice behind it from freely flowing into the ocean. Credits: BBC Vigorous melting Salty and relatively warm ocean water is infiltrating beneath Thwaites Glacier, leading to significantly speedy melting. This process, termed as “vigorous melting“, is eroding its stability. However, its potential collapse could lead to a staggering 10-foot rise in sea levels, posing a dire threat to coastal communities worldwide. Previous studies discovered a deep connection to the east through which deep water flows from Pine Island Bay. That study also attributed the melting to the heat transport caused by channels bringing warm water towards the glacier from the north. With melting, glaciers become light and float off the land where they used to be situated. The resulting retreating grounding line exposes more of a glacier’s base to seawater, increasing the risk of melting. Since the late 1990s, the glacier has seen a 14km retreat of its “grounding line.” The grounding line is the point where the ice flowing off the land and along the seabed floats up to form a huge platform.   https://www.pmfias.com/current-affairs-for-upsc-civil-services-exam-may-28-2024/   or here Satellite data reveals Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier is melting faster than we thought | Space WWW.SPACE.COM Seawater rushing miles beneath the glacier makes the ice more vulnerable to melting.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

County Court claim - jaznh


jaznh
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5081 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Okay, that's fine

 

You'll need to refine your Letter Before Action, as it will need to go to Howard Cohens giving them 7 days to comply without any reference to CL Finance.

 

 

You may wish to consider writing to CL Finance to ask for a copy of the "concessionary arrangement" for completeness of your records.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks snoops - I really can't thank you enough. I am adding to your reputation every chance I get!

 

Today we received an allocation questionaire which has to be returned by the 20th Nov. So I'm starting to get worried. How does the online defence relate to the defence I'll need to include with the AQ?

 

In the online defence (obviously shorter), I had claimed that there could not rightfully be any proper termination or assignment, since the default notice had not allowed time for that.

 

So will my AQ defence mention this, & further to that, will I now ask for full disclosure of the CPR 31.14 documents in the AQ. Is there any point in continuing with a letter before action?

Many thanks & regards, JnH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now you've got the AQ it would be futile to proceed with the Letter before Action.

 

The AQ will allow you to request disclosure of the documents you require.

 

Have a look at these links for info on AQ's (courtesy of 42man) -

 

Link Financial County Court Summons - N150

 

Directions for N150 or N149 Allocation questionnaire - Paul's guide to N149 & N150 AQ's

 

Allocation Questionnaire...Urgent help needed please!!! - N150

 

Court papers received- what now??!!**WON**CASE DISMISSED - N149 (with draft order for directions)

 

upto the eyeballs v CL Finance No CCA IN COURT ** Help ** - N150

 

The dreaded court claim came today... - N150

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi snoops, it's Jaznh, very grateful for all the brilliant help & assistance you & 42man have been giving me.

I paste a link to your post "Paul's guide to N149..."; because I was wondering if you think I might be able to use the basic format in our court case.

Directions for N150 or N149 Allocation questionnaire

 

I have to have the AQ in by this Friday (20th), & I have requested a number of documents according to CPR 31.14; but they've only satisfied part of the request - & I reckon the Default notice is dodgy - I'll also quote to you from my thread where I've mentioned my online defence; as I'm still unsure about what information to include:

Hello again - So I've mounted a defence online to the effect that the DN is dodgy; thus it should not be true that there has been any termination. I think I'm correct in saying that is the claimant's first problem.

 

So later, I will be in a position to ask for full disclosure of documents requested earlier in my CPR 31. I presume that this will all be included in the full defence; & that this would be filed in conjunction with the Allocation Q. Is that right?

 

Many thanks once again, JnH

 

Would I need to put a complete embarrassed defence in now; or is it just a matter of asking for full disclosure now? I would once again very much appreciate your help.

 

Regards, JnH

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Allocation Questionnaire is now the point you ask for the undisclosed documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim. - in your case the Consumer Credit Agreement and the Default Notice.

 

You can also ask for permission to amend your defence once the documents are supplied.

 

It's all in pt's thread -

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/131499-directions-n150-n149-allocation.html

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very Interesting! - Yesterday, I submitted our AQ to local County court, & today, we received a very interesting letter from 'LEWIS DEBT RECOVERY'; who say "as you are aware, act for CL Finance Ltd.' Actually, NO we're NOT AWARE of any such thing!

Then they say that "we are instructed by our client to offer you an incentive to settle... to bring this matter to a speedy conclusion we are permitted to offer you a 50% discount... This is a splendid opportunity for you to satisfy your liability to our client..."

They then encourage us to phone them "NOW"; or alternatively use an attached Giro or send a cheque, but saying if we choose either of these latter options, we should allow at least four days for payment to reach us. They give us till the 27th Nov. to pay with this offer. At the top of the letter typed in capitals they have "without prejudice".

 

I would very much appreciate your thoughts on this letter; (a few questions):

 

Why print WITHOUT PREJUDICE"?;

Why would 'LEWIS DEBT RECOVERY' be dealing with the account; if CL Finance have already issued court proceedings; & even though this letter tries to suggest that we knew Lewis were involved (we most certainly didn't), does them saying "you are aware" have any significance?

 

In advance, many thanks.

Regards, JnH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers snoops - get us to acknowledge; then try & chase us for the rest after these proceedings are done! If that is the case, is it worth using the letter with this case in any way?

 

PS - I'll post this on the thread as well - you have a great weekend too. Regards, JnH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Almost..... If you decided to accept LDR's very generous offer, CL Finance willl produce a Statement of Account in court showing that a payment was made to the account, therefore the defendant acknowledges the debt.

 

I don't see anything in LDR's offer to discontinue the proceedings if you accept the settlement.......remember, the letter is marked "Without prejudice" so it can't be used in court.

Now why have they headed the letter as such ? :rolleyes:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Today we received a letter from our local court saying that "Before District Judge.... Upon the courts own motion. The court has made this order of its own initiative without a hearing. If you object..., you must make a application to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days.

IT IS ORDERED THAT

The Judge has considered your case is suitable for mediation & you are therefore invited to use the free Sm. claims Mediation Service. The case will be stayed for 28 days in order for mediation to be arranged..."

 

After this period, the letter says that 'the court will list the claim for final hearing so that your claim is not delayed'; while emphasizing that mediation would still be possible; which, if reached before any final hearing, will be cancelled. The last sentence tells us: 'continue to prepare for the final hearing as directed by the Judge.'

The letter has two dates in it - at the end, it says "Dated 20 November"; whereas in box at the top where it says "In the ............. County Court", one of its boxes uses the date 26 November. Does this have any significance? Should I perhaps phone the court to clarify?

 

I should probably also add that we have lodged pt's Draft Order for Directions & N149 / 150 **Allocation Questionnaire - Section G / H **- other information - here's a link to that: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/131499-directions-n150-n149-allocation.html; sending a registered copy to the Claimant's solicitors, which we have had no response to - & certainly no copy of the claimant's AQ or enclosed documents. The 14 days that they've had to react to the draft order runs out this Friday (4th Dec). I think that's everything I can think of at this stage. Any advice? In advance, once again, many thanks & respect. Regards, JnH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again 42man, a very interesting case indeed!

 

I'm not certain what the implications of that are - should I just phone the court to ask why I haven't received the other side's AQ or any enclosed documents? I did make a mistake filing our AQ, as I failed to mention that I had served copies to the Claimant. But the court let me correct that, by allowing me to submit a note saying that I had served the doc's to them. I saw the clerk stamp the note.

 

Would the Sm. claims mediation ordered by the court interfere in any way with the AQ documents, or the draft order for directions arising from mine?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right - rang the court on Thursday, to ask two things: i) Should the claimant have sent me a copy of thier AQ; & of course, any of its enclosed documents. The guy I spoke to said I shouldn't necessarily expect to have been sent any of this - he said they don't legally have to. I didn't really know how to respond. That was question 1, the other, ii) hat should I do if the draft order for directions that I filed with my AQ was ignored by the claimant? He told me that we should wait to see if it actually was ignored. As I post this today (Mon 7th), the claimant has not provided the documents demanded in the draft order I submitted with my AQ - here's a link to pt's thread: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/131499-directions-n150-n149-allocation.html - what should I do now? Advice would be much appreciated. Regards, JnH

Link to post
Share on other sites

The other side are not obliged to send you a copy of their Allocation Questionnaire.

 

The draft order that you completed is read by the Judge and he then makes a decision, not the other side.

 

I'm presuming you sent the other side a copy of your AQ as a courtesy but they are not required to act on it.

 

You'll get a letter shortly from the court telling you what will happen next.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And yes - I did send the claimant a copy of my AQ, & its enclosed documents. It appears as if the judge felt that a period should be set for mediation.

Should I contact the mediation service to tell them that the claimant will not satisfy my CPR request; & hasn't at any time responded to our requests to provide the CCA, a true default notice, (& hence a true notice of assignment, as well as a true termination notice.) Should I tell them (the mediation service) that I cannot properly defend a court claim without any of these?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Updating:.....

As of now we still haven't been able to reach the mediation service - little bit frustrating, been trying for two weeks. The letter we received from the judge said that the stay (28 days)wouldn't continue for long so that the claim is not delayed. This was mentioned in a letter of 26th Nov at the very latest; & we still have heard nothing from the court!

 

Another thing: If we do speak with mediation, should I mention the draft order which the claimant has ignored; & perhaps all the other documents CL Finance haven't produced? Would very much appreciate a little advice. Many thanks in advance - Regards, JnH

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...