Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Go Debt - help needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5383 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi postggi

 

I'm tugmistress's other half. Thanks for all the help you've given her on this just wish I'd found you earlier. Had a read through the links you put up and I was wondering although I have paid them as from what I've read it was for an unforceable/missold agreement could I claim this money back or is it too late now.

 

Thanks again

 

Stuart

Link to post
Share on other sites

my own opinion would be to leave well alone on that score

at the end of the day you did have use of the finance agreement and a court may well not be to pleased if you go down that road.

its called unjust enrichment

 

just be satisfied you are getteing rid of a mile stone around your neck and put it down to life lessons.

 

i dont blame you for wanting to get your money back as from the beggining they were conning you.

 

keep me informed

regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK letter received this morning from Go Debt --

 

Dear Mrs XXXX

ref direct auto financial services ltd - £1281.28

Thank you for your letter of 12th August 2009.

We do not agree with your view and believe your account is enforceable.

Yours Sincerely

Carwin Humphries

 

 

....................................

 

What's next please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not Unexpected

 

Thats Just A Template Reply

 

You Need Now To Write Again By Recorded Delievery

 

Ask Them To Clarify Why They Consider The Account Enforceable

AND TO COUNTER THE POINTS RAISED IN LAW

 

Remind Them Until They Comply The Account Is Still In Dispute

 

Request A Reply With In 14 Days Or You Will Be Handing The File Over To Stephensons Solicitors To Act On Your Behalf

 

No Panic

This Is Normal

Link to post
Share on other sites

YOUR ADDRESS

GO DEBT

ADDRESS

 

 

ACC NO

OR REF NO

 

 

DATE

 

 

DEAR SIR/MADAM

 

 

THANKYOU FOR YOUR LETTER DATED XYZ FOR WHICH THE CONTENTS HAVE BEEN NOTED.

 

 

I SENT YOU A LETTER ON THE XYZ WITH REFERENCE TO A YES CAR CREDIT AGREEMENT FOR WHICH THE CONTENTS ARE BELOW

 

 

 

 

 

 

after Having An Audit Of My Agreement , I Have Been Informed The Agreement Can Not Be Enforced

 

any Deposit Or Trade In Has Been Used For The Ppi Insurance, Not For The Purpose Intended.

as A Result The Agreement Is Unenforceable

 

if You Maintain The Agreement Can Be Enforced, I Will Have No Alternative To Turn The Matter Over To A Firm Of Solicitors Called Stevensons.

 

as You Have Had Prior Dealings With These Solicitors, Costs Now Become An Issue

 

i Expect Your Reply With In 14 Days

 

 

 

 

 

YOUR REPLY TO THIS ON THE XYZ WAS AS FOLLOWS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Mrs XXXX

ref direct auto financial services ltd - £1281.28

Thank you for your letter of 12th August 2009.

We do not agree with your view and believe your account is enforceable.

Yours Sincerely

Carwin Humphries

 

 

 

 

 

 

AS STATED, UNLESS THE ACCOUNT IS TERMINATED, I WILL HAVE NO ALLTERNATIVE BUT TO TURN THIS MATTER OVER TO STEVENSONS SOLICITORS TO ACT ON MY BEHALF.

 

 

IT IS MY BELIEF THAT GODEBT ALONG WITH ANOTHER DEBT COLLECTING AGENCY PURCHESSED NO ENFORCEABLE AGREEMENT THAT HAVE BEEN PUT BEFORE THE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COURTS TO DEEM THEM UNENFORCEABLE.

 

 

COSTS WILL BECOME A MAJOR FACTOR IN THIS AND I REQUEST YOU CONSIDER YOUR POSITION BEFORE I INSTRUCT STEVENSONS.

 

 

IT WILL BE ALSO MY INTENTION TO MAKE A COMPLAINT TO THE FINANCIAL OMBUDSMAN OVER THIS MATTER. AS YOU ARE AWARE I NEED YOUR REPLY TO MY COMPLAINT BEFORE I CAN ESCALATE IT TO THE FINANCIAL OMBUDSMAN.

 

 

I HAVE INFORMED YOUR COMPANY THAT THE AGREEMENT IS UNENCORCEABLE DUE TO THE FACT ANY DEPOSIT OR TRADE IT HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE INSURANCE PRODUCTS AND NOT FOR THE PURPOSE INTENDED, THE VEHICLE.

THIS HAS PREJUDICED MYSELF IN REGARDS TO THE TERM OF THE LOAN AND THE TOTAL AMMOUNT REPAYABLE DUE TO THE INCREASED INTEREST PAYMENTS.

 

 

I REQUIRE AN EXPLANATION WITH STATUTE LAW LEGISLATION TO COUNTER THIS DEFENCE BEFORE THIS MATTER IS ESCALATED TO THE FINANCIAL OMBUDSMAN OR CIVIL ACTION.

THIS REPLY WILL ALSO BE USED IN ANY LEGAL ACTION INSTRUCTED BY YOUR COMPANY IN THIS MATTER.

 

 

UNTIL GODEBT OFFER COMPLIANCE IN THIS MATTER OR BY WAY OF A FINAL RESPONSE, THIS ACCOUNT REMAINS IN OFFICIAL DISPUTE AND I EXPECT NO ENFORCEMENT ACTION TO BE TAKEN EITHER BY CORRESPONDANTS OR THROUGH THE COURTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FEEL FREE TO ADD OR DELEATE

 

YOU GET THE IDEA

Link to post
Share on other sites

just a quick update, got a phone call yesterday from that carwin humphries guy, he started wittering on about the account on hold, i just butted in and said i had sent another letter recorded to him and he asked when, i said last week and he said he hadn't received it yet and said something it had better arrive tomorrow ? then i put the phone down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Take It That Humphries Gut Was From DODEBT/ Cretin

As Far As You Are Concerned The Account Is On Hold And In Dispute And As You Sent The Letter By Recorded Delievery, They Can Sod Off

 

Its Nice Knowing The Boot Is On The Other Foot And Well Done For Standing Your GrounD

This Chap Knows Exactly What The Situation Is

 

Its All Over Bar The Shouting

 

They Have To Try, Dont They,

But You Know Better

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...