Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you're set on pursuing the receiver then a complaint to his governing body (if any) might be a sensible low risk first step. You need to confirm what qualifications he actually has. I don't believe an LPA Receiver necessarily needs to be a licensed insolvency practioner, although he may be. Or he may a chartered surveyor. I note you say "LPA" and "fixed charge" receiver, but aren't those two different appointments with different remits? What relevant powers are given in the mortgage terms and security? Or if that's unclear then how was the appointment described to you? Ducking back to the comment I made earlier, you consulted a solicitor who advised a claim against the receiver. How did he advise that you do so?   Some background reading (accepting it's from 2013 and you may be working off more recent preceded overturning this) .. LPA receivers owe very limited duty to borrowers; a reminder WWW.WRIGHTHASSALL.CO.UK As lenders rely more and more on their powers to appoint an LPA Receiver, a recent case has clarified the Receiver’s obligations, both to the lender and its borrower.  
    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

New kid on the block- unenforceable credit agreement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5375 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi to everyone! Am trying to navigate this fab site, but not very computer literate - so looking for help. Recently heard about unenforceable credit, and have decided to give it a go. Am I right in avoiding the claims companies that have recently told me they had a 92% success rate in court? they were asking for £590 up front fee. I don't have my credit agreements - can anyone direct me to a sample letter i could use?

Very very thankful for any advice/help FIFI

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, I have been reading these threads for a few months now and must say I found them to be very helpful. However I have followed every piece of advise given and got knowhere. I have been so frustraited with evrything going on that I decided to obtain legal advise about my credit cards and here is what I was told. As the laws changed in 2006 and where enforced in 2008 it now states that the consumer who took out a credit card or loan before April 2007 has no rights. The creditors nolonger have to provide a copy of your agreement and do not even have to hold one. If you use the civil procedures act 30.16 they still do not have to disclose it. Even if they do not hold a copy of an agreement containing your signature it doesnt matter as the law has now changed. They only have to supply you with a true copy so beware. You cannot win against them as the law clearly protects them now against people claiming to have their debts written off due to no agreement excisting. I have got a court hearing for the 8th Sept 2009 where I am asking the judge to order Barclaycard to supply me with a copy of the agreement they hold containing my signature and my solicitor has advised me that they do not even have to hold one now. I would advise anyone who thinks they can get their debts written off to seek expert advice before even asking for a copy of their agreement.

Regards

Charlick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi M8, as far as this solicitor from Morgan Solicitors is concerned it doesnt matter when the agreement was taken out all agreements comply with the new cca 2008 law. I find it hard to belive that she can advise me of this so i'm going to try and follow it through, my court date is the 8th Sept I hope.

Can you tell me how to start a new thread please as I am new to this.:razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

it doesnt matter when the agreement was taken out all agreements comply with the new cca 2008 law.

That's not true, CCA 2008 is not retrospective, it covers agreements made after 2007, I can't remember the exact month off-hand. Agreements prior to 2007 are still covered by CCA 1974.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think consumer law is her speciality :rolleyes:

 

As I said any agreement prior to April 6th 2007 must include all the prescribed terms within the four corners of the document. CCA 2008 is not retrospective, if it were this site along with all the other consumer sites wouldn't exist would it?

 

Maybe she should brush up on the Consumer Credit Acts & Amendments before she advises anyone else. :rolleyes:

 

See; http://www.mcgrigors.com/pdfdocs/Consumer%20Credit%20Act%202006.pdf

Edited by cerberusalert
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...