Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
    • Whilst trying to point score over Biden, Trump can't remember the name of his own doctor. Trump gets name of his doctor wrong as he challenges Biden to cognitive test | Donald Trump | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Gaffe came as 78-year-old Republican presidential candidate sought to bolster his support among Black and Latino voters in Michigan  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

didn't send lloyds a copy of court allocation questionnaire!!


honory
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6353 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Just another question as I've received notification of the court date - 1st March 2007 and need to know when to send everything in.

I have kept all letters they have sent and will make copies although I do not have all the copies of the statements that the charges appear on. Should I request copies again? I feel such a fool to have not kept them but I never really thought it would get this far. Should I sit tight till at least 1st feb and then get the bundle together?? (thanks GaryH for your thread which helped me with what to include in the bundle) Any help is gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The notice of allocation containing the court date should also contain directions. These would typically read something like this;

 

Both parties shall by 14 days before the hearing file and serve copies of all documents on which they intend to rely at the hearing..... etc.

 

Do you have something like this? If so, you need to send it by the date specified at the very latest. If the date is 14 days before the hearing, then you may be best off holding off for a while. You may well get a settlement in the next few weeks. If you don't by say, mid January, then send your bundle in. That said, by sending your bundle now it may just prompt them to settle earlier, so really the choice is yours.

 

Just one teensy little thing - do you think you can keep to one thread from now on please? It makes it much easier for us all to follow. Thanks:)

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would imagine you will get a settlement soon then, I'm not sure what SCM have defended but if they've opted for a month's stay I'd get onto them and ask what they are doing for a resolution. There is a template letter for this, if you cant find it check out one of GaryH's posts he has some good info in his signature.

 

When you are dealing SCM, tell them you want these other charges back as well - give them a copy of your statements. I'm sure SCM has the sense to pay up than go through the whole process again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the responses and first of all sometimes I've replied to the thread (as in this case) but on all the other occasions I've posted I have posted/started a new thread. I was flabbergasted when the threads all appeared lumped under one heading about the court allocation questionnaire which I posted ages ago. Don't know what's going on but aplogise nevertheless.

The letter advising me of the court does say that parties need to respond 14 days before the hearing which is mid February. What is this though about applying for a stay? Can lloyds apply for a stay to stretch things out even past the 1st March? I hope not!!

I've taken on board the note about including the new charge with the old charges and trying to make [problem] see reason on this. Thanks for the advice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the responses and first of all sometimes I've replied to the thread (as in this case) but on all the other occasions I've posted I have posted/started a new thread. I was flabbergasted when the threads all appeared lumped under one heading about the court allocation questionnaire which I posted ages ago. Don't know what's going on but aplogise nevertheless.

The letter advising me of the court does say that parties need to respond 14 days before the hearing which is mid February. What is this though about applying for a stay? Can lloyds apply for a stay to stretch things out even past the 1st March? I hope not!!

I've taken on board the note about including the new charge with the old charges and trying to make [problem] see reason on this. Thanks for the advice!

 

The moderators of the site have compiled all of your posts into one thread. This way it easier to track what is going on and then we see your previous.

 

I notice that I replied a post of yours when you asked if you should add £30 to your schedule of charges because you went 30p overdrawn, had all of your posts been in one place I would've know that you were way past that stage.

 

I have now noticed you are also way past the exchanging of the AQ stage so my previous comment doesn't apply either.

 

As the other guys have said, stick to this thread when updating us of your journey

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi everyone and a Happy New Year to you all. I have just received a Notification of a Hearing for my husbands account. The judge says in the letter that the hearing is necessary before a final decision about allocation can be made. It is set for 22nd February 2007. What do we have to take to the hearing and is a hearing usual? I hope this is posted on the right thread, apologies if it isn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Honory,

 

Yes don't worry, you're in the right place!

 

So its an allocation hearing then yes? Can you post up the order please?

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gary H and thanks for your help by the way!

The letter received for my husband is entitled a 'Notice of Allocation or Listing Hearing'.

It states that the 'District Judge Chapman has considered the statements of case and allocation questionnaires submitted in this claim and has decided that a hearing is necessary before the final decision about allocation can be made.'

My husband is ordered to attend on the 22nd February at 11.15am.

 

Both my husband and I have claims against LLoyds but my claim was not subject to a hearing as it is being dealt with at a different court (Walsall as opposed to Tamworth). I have had a notice of Small claim sent to me and I am preparing to send the court bundle in soon (my court date is set for March 1st). Hope all this helps you all help me in finding out what to do next!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again and at the risk of asking too many questions could you help me with another problem? I have looked in the FAQ and couldn't find a response - as you will have read in my thread earlier i have just been charged £30 for being 0.33p OD and want to claim this back. My husband has also been charged and we want to combine the claims so that we have to fill everything out just once - can we do this and how???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its very likely that Lloyds will pay beforehand, but should they not, your husband will need to go to the allocation hearing as advised by the order.

 

He won't need the 'court bundle' as it is not the final hearing. The two main objectives will be -

 

a) get allocation to the small claims track. Heres a post by Zoot which explains the arguements he'll need to present - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclays-bank/35043-ade-steph-jack-barclays-2.html#post436020

 

b) request an order for specific directions. Take a copy of this draft order along and propose it to the judge - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/53570-new-strategy-allocation-questionaires.html#post441556

 

Remember, its only an allocation hearing. Nothing can be won or lost on that day, the worst that could happen is allocation to the fast track, which is very unlikely anyway. There is no pressure on so its nothing to worry about at all.

 

How are you getting on with the court bundle for your claim?

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Gary, that's really helpful. Let's hope they do settle beforehand.

 

With regard to my court bundle I haven't sent anything off yet but I have copies of all the letters and nearly all the statements. I have unfortunately got rid of some of the statements so have applied for replacement copies. Probably too late but they only relate to approximately four charges.

 

On the other point, does anyone know how we go about combining both my husband's and my own claim into a single claim to save the hassle of concurrent claims? Thanks for all your help once again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the other point, does anyone know how we go about combining both my husband's and my own claim into a single claim to save the hassle of concurrent claims

The time to have done this was before you filed a claim. I may be wrong, but I would think the only way you could do this now is to withdraw both claims (losing both court fees) and refiling a single claim. Not really a good idea.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all and apologies for being a little unclear in my last post. What I wanted to know was how to link two new claims together - one for £30 with my single lloyds account and one for £30 with my husband's single account. These charges were incurred in December 2006 and we have had the money deducted out of our accounts at the beginning of this month. Do we send two separate letters before action and consolidate the claim at the MCOL stage? A step by step guide would help as I've checked the FAQs and can't find any advice. Thanks so much!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Honory,

 

You can consolidate them from the outset, I'd have thought. Just quote both account numbers on your prelim and LBA.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that advice Gary, I have drafted our prelim. letter but don't know whether to send it until our other claims are settled one way or another. The preliminary letter template does say that we are claiming after it has come to our notice that the charges they levy are unlawful - which is not strictly true as we have known they are unlawful for some time! Plus these charges that we are asking to be given back, are on the same accounts that our original claims were for - I wonder, will they get confused?? Please help as I am desperate to send this letter off!

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case I would wait untill this claim is settled before you pursue another lot of charges for the same account. You're not supposed to file multiple claims at the same time if they concern the same account. There is nothing stopping you sending the prelim and LBA though - just wait till this claims concluded before you file the next one.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, thats correct. Theres nothing stopping you issueing your prelim then LBA now, but wait untill this claims settled before filing another court claim.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well I didn't think the day would ever come but this post is just to tell you all that at close of business on Friday 19th January Lloyds settled both claims with the exact amounts plus the interest and court charges. We're over the moon and have already taken the money out and put it into a savings account with another bank. The next thing to do is to make a donation - we couldn't have done any of it without you all,

 

Thanks a million!

 

Of course we have another claim for £120 just starting off but after that we're closing our accounts with Lloyds (not because we think it will be any different with any other bank) as the whole experience has been so bloody stressful I don't think that I could go inside my branch ever again!

The very best of luck to everyone out there whatever stage your claim is at - keep going however hard you feel it might be at times - it is worth it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

CONGRATULATIONS!!!

:D Fantastic news - very well done!:)

 

Bet your glad you persevered now! Enjoy the money.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...