Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
    • Hold on @BankFodder, that was a bit harsh. I spoke with the EVRi complaints Facebook group to begin with, a user on that group told me to send a letter but didn't give any specifics. Here at CAG, I was looking more for specific help as I've never raised such a claim before, and wanted to be sure that my claim was correct, which is why I've researched information with the other groups too, to be sure; but you seem to have assumed that I've made some form of contact with the other groups, such that I find your comments and tone to be very unfair. And I do know a thing or two about forums, that forum users are unpaid volunteers, I happen to be a Tableau Ambassador, and so perform a very similar role helping others in an unpaid capacity  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Loopyloopy v Natwest


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5403 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 284
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Lisa Yourbank as a wealth of experience and knowledge of NW/RBS lets get the statements its imperative to your case

 

Regards

 

andy

Edited by Andyorch

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hubby cant go into the branch until saturday, I will post of an SAR tomorrow specifically requesting pre 2002 statements and see where that gets me.

I assumed the reason they only went back as far as 2002 was due to the 6 year rule nothing to do with the computer systems. (you learn something new everyday)

Andy, do the spreadsheets make it easier reading? Do you think we have a strong case against NW?

Thanks all..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lisa I cant promise a result but will endevour to assist you all the way in getting a mutual acceptable result.From what i have gleened up to now you are looking good.The bottom line is no agreements and as so we will go into court on that merit

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will post of an SAR tomorrow specifically requesting pre 2002 statements and see where that gets me.

 

Lisa, you might add the following to your SAR List ...

 

L. Account details of any accounts set up by Nat West / RBS known as ROUTER ACCOUNTS

 

IF YOU UNABLE TO DEAL WITH THIS REQUEST, YOU SHOULD IMMEDIATELY FORWARD IT TO THE PERSON WITHIN YOUR ORGANISATION RESPONSIBLE FOR DATA PROTECTION.

Edited by shakespeare62

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law and litigation privilege

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may also on the SAR wish to alter your signature very slightly e.g. include some tiny mark you will recognize in case it is copied, but which won't give them an excuse to claim it's not your signature should they have it on record.

 

I smell a rat on the £12,400 debit / credit for 17 & 18 Dec 2002. I wonder if its related to the now famous RBS "Router Accounts".

 

The link below is to a guardian newspaper report on a "phantom account" RBS had set up in Cagger Paul Walton's name. It's worth a quick read if u can spare the time. :-

 

How trustworthy is your bank? | Money | The Guardian

 

May I just credit (no pun intended) Nattie aka YourBank for the info I referred to in post #51 of this thread. It was taken from info he kindly provided on another website. He lost his job over helping others.

Edited by shakespeare62

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law and litigation privilege

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks shakespeare for your help, I have been unable to get to a printer today as I have not been very well but am going aroung the in-laws in the morning to print of a SAR and post it to NW. The article you posted is a very intresting read thanks for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're welcome. I hope you're feeling better and that DH and baby son are doing well. There will probably be a pause now for a few weeks until you get back your SAR results. Remember to check with Royal Mail website tracker that it was delivered to RatsNest (I trust you sent the SAR Special Delivery or at least by Recorded Delivery).

 

Once you've received the requested statements etc., post an update on here so Andy can line you up on your text tactical move. I'll keep looking out as well.

 

'Shakey

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law and litigation privilege

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

Im getting a little worried now as I have still not received the statements from natwest desite writing and going into the branch.

My excange of evidence needs to be completed by the 23rd April. I have still not recieved anything from irwin and mitchell either.

Help!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lisa, hopefully Andy will look in on your posting shortly.

 

It seems to me that if you are having difficulty obtaining important information from the Claimant - you could write to the solicitors and send a copy of it the Court (put cc District Judge , your county Court at the bottom of the letter in bold.)

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law and litigation privilege

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lisa and Shakespeare

 

I have only just returned from holiday so i hope you didnt feel abandoned,Ok have you recieved the Claimants Disclosure list yet?

I would sumise not!!

Dont wait for the response to your SAR to use as the basis of your Disclosure list.Your list should contain anything of use from your papertrail in the lead up to litigation that maybe of use in arguing your case.

This may be request for information ignored or payment plan requests.

Any evidence of penalty charges and copies of invalid Default Notices etc.Requests for any copies of CCA agreements and so forth.

 

I will advise further on your response to the above

 

Regards

 

Andy;)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that you may well be panicking unnecessariliy...

 

At this stage you don't need to chase the other side for anything

 

Do your list of documents on the basis of what you have in your possession - then get your list off to the other side.

 

When you get their list - go through it carefully - get copies of everything. If there is anything missing do a letter to our heroes tell them what's missing, give them 7 days to provide the requested documents if not tell them that you will apply for an order for specific disclosure. If they don't comply 7 days later do a chasing letter giving a further 7 days then if you still haven't got the documents make an application on an N244 for an Order. If they fail to comply ultimately the claim will be struck out.

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lisa and Shakespeare

 

I have only just returned from holiday so i hope you didnt feel abandoned,Ok have you recieved the Claimants Disclosure list yet?

I would sumise not!!

Dont wait for the response to your SAR to use as the basis of your Disclosure list.Your list should contain anything of use from your papertrail in the lead up to litigation that maybe of use in arguing your case.

This may be request for information ignored or payment plan requests.

Any evidence of penalty charges and copies of invalid Default Notices etc.Requests for any copies of CCA agreements and so forth.

 

I will advise further on your response to the above

 

Regards

 

Andy;)

 

Hi Andy - hope you had a good holiday. Glad your back :) Lisa, you may want to update (if relevant) and repost contents of your post #38.

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law and litigation privilege

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sorry been really busy. The baby hasnt been very well and its been a bit stressfull and tiering.

Anyway statements arrived today!! Just putting them on a spreadsheet now.

Still have not received the claimants evidence list... Will let you know asap.

I cant beleive my hubbys original loan was in dec 1999 and for only 4000!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right I have now completed the spreadsheet..

Please see attatched, let me know if its ok to open im not very good with attatchments.

I Began an evidence list in a previous post any comments on what I should add/change.

Also the lists are due on the 24th april (I beleive, will double check though as my head is all over the place at the mo) If I havent the claimats list by say the 20th April should I still send mine as I dont want to be penalised for not getting it in. Not long now!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing about lists of documents is that you don't need to itemise everything e.g.

 

If you list letters between you and the bank - you wouldn't list them individually you would say correspondence between defendant and bank of various dates from (date of first letter) to (date of last letter)

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my proposed correspondence list:

 

National Westminster Bank Plc Claimant

 

 

And

 

 

Mr loopy loopyDefendant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DISCLOSURE BY LIST - of - Mr loopyloopy– DEFENDANT

 

 

 

 

I, Mr loopyloopy, of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, being the defendant in this case, intend to rely on the following documents in court:–

 

1. Correspondances

 

 

(A) Copy of County Court Claim form issued by Claimant, dated 22nd Febuary 2008.

(B) Copy of formal request, dated 29th Febuary 2008, from Mr loopyloopy to Irwin Mitchell solicitors requesting a copy of the relevant executed Consumer Credit Agreement under S.78 Consumer Credit Act 1974, All records held relevant to the case, and Any other documents they seeked to rely on in court.

© Copy of acknowledment of claim posted 11th March 2008.

(D) Copy of letter from Irwin Mitchell solicitors to Mr loopyloopy dated 18th March 2008, confirming receipt of formal request for documentation and advising all action will be put on hold for eight weeks whilst the documentation is obtained.

(E) Copy of Mr loopy loopy’s defence. Submitted to Irwin and Mitchell solicitors and Medway county court.

(F) Copy of Claimants allocation questionaire dated 23rd June 2008.

(G) Copy of letter from National Westminster Bank Plc to Mr loopy loopy dated 25th June 2008 detailing account numbers which the claim is based upon and past payment plans agreed.

(H) Copies of Current account statements as supplied by Irwin Mitchell solicitors.

(I) Copies of Loan account statements as supplied by Irwin Mitchell solicitors

(J) Copy of letter from Irwin Mitchell solicitors to Mr loopyloopy dated 03rd December 2008 offering a full and final settlement of the claim for £20,000.

(K) Copy of Allocation Questionnaire completed by Mr loopyloopy.

(L) Copy of proposed directions from Mr loopyloopy submitted to Irwin and Mitchell solicitors and Medway county court.

(M) Copy of proposed directions from Irwin Mitchell solicitors dated 05th January 2009

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lisa

 

Still no sign of the Claimants Disclosure list?

Yours looks fine, dont be too prompt with the by date.I have known cases were the list has not been sent to the CC dealing with the case but just between the Claimant and Defendent.

You can check to see if the Claimant have sent theirs to the CC.

If not inform the CC dealing with the case.

Forearmed is forewarned.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...