Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • no that is not a defence. because you don't have a photo
    • I purchased the vehicle using finance through motonovo under a HP 60 months agreement. I have now amended the document ensuring all is in black. Unfortunately, this email has now been sent. However, I have not sent a letter to big motoring world. Also, I have taken the section of the firealarm issue. I am struggling to convert to PDF. I am not tech savy at all. My mistake was that the the salesman was very fussy on a sale. We went down a quiet road for a little test drive and not for a lengthy road test. The water issue was not present at this moment of time. However, it only became prevalent after driving away, after all docs signed. I did stated to Audi I wanted a diagnostic report. However, they carried out an Audicam which is footage of the issue. Audi have diagnosed the issue as a common issue where coupes/cabriolets accumulate water in the seals. However, I did state beforehand for no issue to be rectified due to me wanting to reject the vehicle. I am awaiting a report from Audi through email from the branch manager in relation to the issue. The issue so far is the water still being present in the sills. Audi tried to fix the issue however the problem is still prevalent. Regards 
    • First begging letter received from Overdales   ;Blah blah blah, our client's are going to win this blah blah blah we supplied all your documents under CPR   PS you can stop all this by paying £1200 less in a lump sum
    • Right,  so the court hasn't send out the Directions Questionnaires/N180s yet. PE's one is a false one, meant to intimidate you into thinking your defence was rubbish and they are confident with their claim. This is par for the course.  The PPCs do this regularly. However, PE have gone further and written that "a copy has also been filed with the court" which is a lie as the court haven't even sent out the papers yet. Keep a screenshot of MCOL, later on in your WS you can draw attention to their lying and abuse of court procedure. If you've got time on your hands, then complain to the BPA about one of their members lying.    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Attendance notice the clearance of goods.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5475 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I will try and explain my situation as best I can and would be greatful for any advice given.

 

A couple of months ago I rather stupidly ignored a request from the council regarding payment of council tax as I was in the process of claiming for JSA and thought this would cover it. This request was delayed or denied and I recieved a letter through from a bailiffs firm about two weeks ago. This was then follwed by another a week later on the 4th of June. I tried to get some money together to figure out how to pay this and my brother agreed to help me last week. I initially tried to make payment over the net which wasnt working but told me the debt was at £152 ish I then tried ringing the agency to make payment who told me that was wrong and the fee was actuallly £280 plus. I explained what i had saw literally 5 mins before and he put up quite a lot of resistance and bustle when i advised i could afford to pay that he said he would be round later that day to sieze goods etc. and that the fee wasnt right as their systems hadnt been 'updated' Sure enough I checked not long after the call and the fee he had given me was on.

 

I then started looking on here and eventually managed to pay the council direct the original debt over the phone - £110. The bailiff had been very curt and abraisive (bordering on abusive) with me after calling me several times to see if i had got this £280 plus money available. Once I had spoke to the council I advised him on his next call that the debt was settled and he said I had not paid "the right ammount" I said how do you know? Its showing on our systems what you paid. Ok I said, what does it show is left, he actually said "£140 something" a completely abitrary and made up figure then followed by did you go in and pay it, to which i said no and he then changed his tune saying the full £280 is showing on the system still.

 

He was quite clearly making it up. I said i have paid he countered again saying he would be round later that day etc. After rereading on here i expected that to be the end of the matter. But yesterday a hand delivered letter was posted saying;

 

Total due £168.50

I called today with transportation to remove good. I will return within 48 hours with police assistance if necessary to complete my task. etc etc.

 

My question is what do i do next. The council are happy the debt is paid and satisifed but clearly the bailiff is not.

 

Many thanks for any help given.

Edited by mcnulty
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Happy Contrails

The bailiff cannot levy distress just to recover his fees. He needs to claim them from you by starting a claim in the county court.

 

The law prescribing bailiffs fees for collecting unpaid council tax is the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and provides £24.00 for a first visit and £18.00 for a second visit if one is made. No other bailiff's fees can lawfully be charged if a bailiff has not moved your goods in a vehicle and you have not signed any document consenting to a levy or a walking possessions agreement (currently a flat rate of £10).

 

Phone the bailiff on his mobile and ask him for the name of the court that issied his bailiffs certificate and say you will be reporting him for trying to levy for his fees when the liability order has already been settled - and quickly end the call. If he refuses to disclose which court issued his certificate then make a note of the bailiffs comments. Phone the Ministry of Justice Public Register of Bailiffs on 020 3334 6355 and ask which court issued his certificate. Download the complaint form to make an official complaint against the bailiff http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/form4_0606.pdf and send the form to the certificating court enclosing supporting evidence such as the bailiffs document showing the bailiffs fees he is trying to charge, any amounts paid and documentary evidence the liability order is settled.

 

To be technical the bailiff commits an offence under Section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006 because he is overcharging you with his fees and you have a right to make a complaint to police and ask the crime is investigated. Threatening you with police is also an offence, you can seek advice about obtaining a restraining order under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bailiff cannot levy distress just to recover his fees. He needs to claim them from you by starting a claim in the county court.

 

The law prescribing bailiffs fees for collecting unpaid council tax is the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and provides £24.00 for a first visit and £18.00 for a second visit if one is made. No other bailiff's fees can lawfully be charged if a bailiff has not moved your goods in a vehicle and you have not signed any document consenting to a levy or a walking possessions agreement (currently a flat rate of £10).

 

Phone the bailiff on his mobile and ask him for the name of the court that issied his bailiffs certificate and say you will be reporting him for trying to levy for his fees when the liability order has already been settled - and quickly end the call. If he refuses to disclose which court issued his certificate then make a note of the bailiffs comments. Phone the Ministry of Justice Public Register of Bailiffs on 020 3334 6355 and ask which court issued his certificate. Download the complaint form to make an official complaint against the bailiff http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/form4_0606.pdf and send the form to the certificating court enclosing supporting evidence such as the bailiffs document showing the bailiffs fees he is trying to charge, any amounts paid and documentary evidence the liability order is settled.

 

To be technical the bailiff commits an offence under Section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006 because he is overcharging you with his fees and you have a right to make a complaint to police and ask the crime is investigated. Threatening you with police is also an offence, you can seek advice about obtaining a restraining order under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

Thank you very much for your help. I will do what you say. I have seen other people saying to ask for a breakdown of his 'costs or fees' etc. Is this worth doing? What exactly is a levy? I have told my (female) house mate about the situation and am worried they might let them in in my absence what would happen if they did?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Happy Contrails

This is my opinion only and differs from other advice given on this forum.

 

There is no point asking for a fee breakdown or a 'screenshot' of an account. The law prescribes what bailiffs can charge in their fees and the original debt is on the Liability Order or Charge Certificate. The bailiff will just bank your £10 cheque. If a bailiff ask you to pay fees that are not compliant with the law then you can file a Form 4 for which there is no charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my opinion only and differs from other advice given on this forum.

 

There is no point asking for a fee breakdown or a 'screenshot' of an account. The law prescribes what bailiffs can charge in their fees and the original debt is on the Liability Order or Charge Certificate. The bailiff will just bank your £10 cheque. If a bailiff ask you to pay fees that are not compliant with the law then you can file a Form 4 for which there is no charge.

 

Ok. Thanks again. Can you explain what a levy is to me please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Happy Contrails

To collect lawful money due or confiscate property as a collateral for that money

Link to post
Share on other sites

walking possession order the bailiff Levy on goods in your home, garden furniture/tools or your car

 

if the bailiff has done a levy he must leave the walking possession order on your premises the day the levy is made

Link to post
Share on other sites

have a read of this read no 5

 

The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992

 

Distress

45.—(1) Where a liability order has been made, the authority which applied for the order may levy the appropriate amount by distress and sale of the goods of the debtor against whom the order was made.

 

 

 

(2) The appropriate amount for the purposes of paragraph (1) is the aggregate of—

  • (a) an amount equal to any outstanding sum which is or forms part of the amount in respect of which the liability order was made, and

  • (b) a sum determined in accordance with Schedule 5 in respect of charges connected with the distress.

(3) If, before any goods are seized, the appropriate amount (including charges arising up to the time of the payment or tender) is paid or tendered to the authority, the authority shall accept the amount and the levy shall not be proceeded with.

 

(4) Where an authority has seized goods of the debtor in pursuance of the distress, but before sale of those goods the appropriate amount (including charges arising up to the time of the payment or tender) is paid or tendered to the authority, the authority shall accept the amount, the sale shall not be proceeded with and the goods shall be made available for collection by the debtor.

 

(5) The person levying distress on behalf of an authority shall carry with him the written authorisation of the authority, which he shall show to the debtor if so requested; and he shall hand to the debtor or leave at the premises where the distress is levied a copy of this regulation and Schedule 5 and a memorandum setting out the appropriate amount, and shall hand to the debtor a copy of any close or walking possession agreement entered into.

 

(6) A distress may be made anywhere in England and Wales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have a read of this read no 5

 

The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992

 

Distress

45.—(1) Where a liability order has been made, the authority which applied for the order may levy the appropriate amount by distress and sale of the goods of the debtor against whom the order was made.

 

 

 

(2) The appropriate amount for the purposes of paragraph (1) is the aggregate of—

  • (a) an amount equal to any outstanding sum which is or forms part of the amount in respect of which the liability order was made, and

 

  • (b) a sum determined in accordance with Schedule 5 in respect of charges connected with the distress.

(3) If, before any goods are seized, the appropriate amount (including charges arising up to the time of the payment or tender) is paid or tendered to the authority, the authority shall accept the amount and the levy shall not be proceeded with.

 

(4) Where an authority has seized goods of the debtor in pursuance of the distress, but before sale of those goods the appropriate amount (including charges arising up to the time of the payment or tender) is paid or tendered to the authority, the authority shall accept the amount, the sale shall not be proceeded with and the goods shall be made available for collection by the debtor.

 

(5) The person levying distress on behalf of an authority shall carry with him the written authorisation of the authority, which he shall show to the debtor if so requested; and he shall hand to the debtor or leave at the premises where the distress is levied a copy of this regulation and Schedule 5 and a memorandum setting out the appropriate amount, and shall hand to the debtor a copy of any close or walking possession agreement entered into.

 

(6) A distress may be made anywhere in England and Wales.

 

 

Ok. I was just wondering exactly what it was as thats when charges seem to escolate. So what would you advise me to do with regards the 168.50 claimed for against a debt which has been settled with the council?

 

I should point out I have no car or garden furniture and all I have recieved is two posted letters and the hand posted one from yesterday which is the first with any kind of figure on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have only had 1 hand posted letter you owe the bailiff £24.50

letter/e-mail to council official complaint unlawful fees added by bailiff

letter /e-mail bailiffs company asking for screenshot of your account as you are making a form4 complaint to the county court about unlawful fees added to your account bailiffs company's don't like to send screen shot so make it clear that if you don't receive this you will still be making the form 4 complaint and will be adding to it that the bailiffs company refused to send a screen shot when requested

 

send both e-mail and letter

 

letter you send to council send copy to bailiffs

 

letter you send bailiffs send copy to council

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have only had 1 hand posted letter you owe the bailiff £24.50

letter/e-mail to council official complaint unlawful fees added by bailiff

letter /e-mail bailiffs company asking for screenshot of your account as you are making a form4 complaint to the county court about unlawful fees added to your account bailiffs company's don't like to send screen shot so make it clear that if you don't receive this you will still be making the form 4 complaint and will be adding to it that the bailiffs company refused to send a screen shot when requested

 

send both e-mail and letter

 

letter you send to council send copy to bailiffs

 

letter you send bailiffs send copy to council

 

This letter came through AFTER the debt was payed. Does that make a difference? Are there any templates of the letters you reccommend out there?

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for your hallowitch and happy contrails.

 

Would still like a couple of questions answered though if you can.

 

Does it make a difference that the first letter I got with any kind of fee on when was hand posted AFTER I had settled the debt? (The other two being deliberately ambiguous and posted through royal mail.)

 

What is the best way of finding out where the £168 figure came from?

 

How do I make a complaint about this bailiff if anything has been done illegaly or immoraly?

 

If he comes to my address again and is let in by my house mate where do I stand?

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

write an official complaint to the council regarding unlawful bailiffs fees

 

The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 . For making a visit to premises with a view to levying distress (whether the levy is made or not): first visit £24.50

second visit if necessary £18

they cant charge for letters sent in the post if the

the liability order was paid before any bailiffs visits so there should be no bailiffs fee

there is no way your bailiffs charges should be £168 at the most all they could try to charge you for is £24.50 for the visit after you had paid (working on the fact that the council didn't tell the bailiff that you had paid it although this is not your fault )

letter e-mail to bailiffs asking for break down of charges as you believe there are unlawful charges on your account state that any unlawful charger will result in a form 4 complaint to the county court

 

put a copy of the letter to the bailiffs in your council letter

put a copy of your letter to the council in your bailiffs letter

include copys of any baillifs letters to the council

send both recorded delivery

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...