Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ccj to with welcome.now dispute


stepwayne
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3926 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

stick to your guns

 

as stated figures dont add up

prescribed terms

etc etc

 

its up to a judge at the end of the day

 

if you want to rub it in tell them that you will leave it up to the decision of the judge and to take a running jump

 

a consent order is like a tomlin order

 

very bad news

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 560
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

what has happened is they have gone over my letter

 

i think its the interest rate difference thats quoted and what you are paying that did it

 

get this set asside and the debt is gone for good

 

they wont be able to enforce

 

have you signed any consent order or anything from irwin mitchelle after the 15 dec

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you sign that on the 20 jan

is it your sig

 

no worries as it will be veto by the set asside as there is no agreement as such

 

dont sign nothing in future you dont understand

 

if this agreement was not rollocks

 

you would be in severe crap

Link to post
Share on other sites

20th jan last year post.

like i said we were bullied into it both by them and our lack of knowledge.

just a thought, if i had carried on fighting the ccj.

the counterclaim fee was for almost 1500. why was it so large, and how the hell do they expect people to pay?

what would i say this time if asked how i would fund this, if welcome did come after me again if its setaside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Deep breath Wayne hun you are doing just fine ;) I know what you mean though and im not even at court stage yet mores the pity!

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

if welcome did come after you again ref the set asside, they would be on a non hoper

 

your agreement has amounts of credit and misstated

 

the apr figures are up the maypole

 

the court is prohibited from enforcing as they are prescribed terms:-D

 

we just need to convince the judge to set asside

 

at the end of the day its up to the judge

 

if he asks why you have left it to now to ask for a set asside, say you have only just started research and realised you can and were terrified on the costs mentioned

Link to post
Share on other sites

i remember on one form. it did state that there was a counterclaim fee of over £1500. Thats why i gave up hope before, hence in the email i sent it states i failed to pay this. Thats why i was literally pushed into signing the form.We could see no other way out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just found it. "notice of transfer of proceedings."

from northampton cc

 

 

To all parties

 

A counterclaim to this claim has been filed.

 

As the defendant is an individual the claim has been transfered to the court covering the are where the defendant lives or carries on business.

 

The counterclaim fee is £1530:00(to be paid by the defendant) at crewe county court, by dec 10 2008.

 

Please read accompanying documents carefully and note that where enclosed the allocation questionnaire should be returned to crewe cc, law courts by the date shown.

Link to post
Share on other sites

bloody hell

 

what you needed to do was with draw the counter claim and deal with the poc on the n1

 

i realise it was beyond your knowledge and understanding

 

if the judge asks why you never defended at the time,

 

tell him and show him that letter

 

its not expected the normal joe public to understand court process

 

you will walk out the court on thursday free of welcome

 

forever

Link to post
Share on other sites

post, on that email attachment there was nothing in there denying any of our claim that the agreement is unenforceable was there? if there was i missed it.

So does this mean their main objection is the timescale and the fact that the consent order was signed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...