Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Glenn Vs MBNA ** SETTLED **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6119 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well received standard response promising action within 28 days, no statements so far though.

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Out of curiosity, MBNA have acknowledged receipt of my SAR and are dealing with it as a claim.

 

I ampresuming that since they havent made the same issue over the microfiche that abbey do that I can ignore this letter and dont need to send them the re-inforcing letter re DPA and microfiche/40days etc?

 

Is my assumption correct?

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

PO Box 30

Chester

CH4 9FD

 

24th August 2006

 

 

Letter Before Action

Data Protection Act 1998

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Your Ref : xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

I thank you for your letter dated 22nd August 2006 and note the contents therein.

 

You will note that my Subject Access Request (dated 22nd July 2006) requested a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my banking history with your organisation. Alternatively, a complete set of statements for that period will be acceptable.

 

Your response only includes a list of charges and doesn’t indicate the transactions.

 

You have made no reference to whether manual intervention is involved in the application of the charges applied to the account.

 

Accordingly, I have to tell you that you have not yet complied with your obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

You will be aware that the initial 40 day statutory period is coming to a close and finishes on 31st August 2006.

 

In an effort to avoid the possibility of court action can you supply the following information before 31st August 2006.

 

1. The date that the account was opened.

2. A true copy of the original signed agreement between the MBNA and myself.

3. The details of the transactions and charges over the whole life of the account.

 

In the event that the requested information is not forthcoming within the statutory period I will instigate court action under Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Right Sent off a LBA for reclaiming charges since i last posted in here.

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

A bit of an update.

 

MBNA have settled in full but i have a few words of warning for those claiming and talking to MBNA to settle their claims

 

When i 1st spoke to them it was about my LBA for non-complaince with the SAR.

 

To help things along I faxed my LBA over for charges. They confirmed the amount of charges for the last six ears, but when prompted did divulge the charges pre six years. They offered to calculate the charges paid too.

 

Because i had some estimated charges in my LBA i wasnt going to be rushed so when they offered to settle i said I wanted to think about it.

 

I then set out a schedule of chagres and costs :

 

Fee for SAR £10.00

Letters x 6 @ £6.75 each

Postage x 6 @ £1.00

Charges

Interest paid @ 16.9%

Contractual @ 22.9% compunded from date of each chrg.

 

The point of listing this is that during the discussions it became clear that they didint intend to add the interest I was charging them.

 

The interest they told me i was due was only the interest I had paid. In my case I think I made a slight mistake because id didnt revise my estimated interest to match their value and I think I lost £100 or so.

 

However, I am happy, the value of my claim ended up more than double my charges and Im happy with that.

 

All I would say to those claiming and talking to MBNA is make sure you know what you are intending to claim and dont accept anything else. have your arguments ready about why you should have them and be prepared for them to argue.

 

 

HTH

 

Glenn

.

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Glen,

i dont know about you but ive found that MBNA can be very aggressive when ringing me , when they rang to get a paymt as id missed it they asked for a post dated card paymt, i agreeded and assumed it would go through, but the following wk a lady rang to ask for double the paymt amd when i told her that id already paid by post dated paymt she said that it wasnt done and now i owe double, which i coulnt pay so i offered an amount i could afford there and then but she refused. She said she wanted the double amount only i said i couldnt afford it or it would put me over my O/D and she said thats NOT HER PROBLEM !and that if i didnt pay it i would be charged late paymt fees again, i tried to explaine that it was pointless cos the more they charged me the more i coulnt pay and that we'd get nowhere but she said she didnt care and wanted paymt , when i asked her name she refused and said it didnt matter as she would pass my acct on to debt reclaime dpt. I heard nothing for a while then i got a post card from a RMA, saying that a Mr GREEN would be calling on friday between 8am & 7pm so wondering what it was all about i rang the no. on it and found out it was a debt collector ! the guy said he wanted £165 over the phone to stop "Mr Green comming to the house" when i said i couldnt pay at that time but could pay in 2 days time by phone he refused and said that Mr Green would be there on Fri, i explained that i would be at work, he said then Mr Green would come back sat and sun till he got the money. I said thats fine i could pay him then, i asked for his name and again he refused !. On sat am i waited till 11ish then rang number the guy said that they only wanted £79.75 from me and that no one would be there to collect money at the wk end, when i asked his name he told me and after i'd paid the amount he thanked me and said good bye. He didnt seem to know why i as asked for £165 in the first place ?? Du know if anyone else has had this sort of hassle with MBNA ??

1st letter to Abbey requesting statements 10/08/06

Reply from Abbey..Sorry on Microfiche..cant do 18/08/06

2nd letter to Abbey Microfiche argument letter R/D 23/08/06

Received 16 Statements from Abbey 23/0806

Reply from Abbey.. enclosed complaints leaflet 2/08/06

Phone call from abbey Re my account 20.55hrs 5/09/06

Letter to MBNA requesting statements 6/9/06

Sent off Data Protection Act letter to MBNA 2/10/06

Sent off Non Compliance letter to P Speed 3/10/06

Cover letter & 5yrs statements received 9/10/06

Received letter from MBNA saying they had reduced limit 9/10/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

A bit of an update.

 

MBNA have settled in full but i have a few words of warning for those claiming and talking to MBNA to settle their claims

 

When i 1st spoke to them it was about my LBA for non-complaince with the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request).

 

To help things along I faxed my LBA over for charges. They confirmed the amount of charges for the last six ears, but when prompted did divulge the charges pre six years. They offered to calculate the charges paid too.

 

Because i had some estimated charges in my LBA i wasnt going to be rushed so when they offered to settle i said I wanted to think about it.

 

I then set out a schedule of chagres and costs :

 

Fee for SAR £10.00

Letters x 6 @ £6.75 each

Postage x 6 @ £1.00

Charges

Interest paid @ 16.9%

Contractual @ 22.9% compunded from date of each chrg.

 

The point of listing this is that during the discussions it became clear that they didint intend to add the interest I was charging them.

 

The interest they told me i was due was only the interest I had paid. In my case I think I made a slight mistake because id didnt revise my estimated interest to match their value and I think I lost £100 or so.

 

However, I am happy, the value of my claim ended up more than double my charges and Im happy with that.

 

All I would say to those claiming and talking to MBNA is make sure you know what you are intending to claim and dont accept anything else. have your arguments ready about why you should have them and be prepared for them to argue.

 

 

HTH

 

Glenn

.

 

Hi,

 

When I spoke to MBNA a few weeks ago they told me that they were not allowed to keep any statements on file for more than six years under VISA / Mastercard regulations. I told them that this was very unusual as as far as I knew, all the regulations said was that records had to be kept a minimum of six months. The guy on the other end was very insistent though.

 

If they found and calculated your charges gong back further than six years then it sounds like this guy was talking out of his backside as I thought. What did you say to prompt them for the earlier charges?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

When I spoke to MBNA a few weeks ago they told me that they were not allowed to keep any statements on file for more than six years under VISA / Mastercard regulations. I told them that this was very unusual as as far as I knew, all the regulations said was that records had to be kept a minimum of six months. The guy on the other end was very insistent though.

 

If they found and calculated your charges gong back further than six years then it sounds like this guy was talking out of his backside as I thought. What did you say to prompt them for the earlier charges?

 

You should be cautious about interpretting what they tell you, did they say they didnt have statements or they didnt have the data?

 

Maybe theyre the same thing, maybe not.

 

Anyway I had estimated charges back to when the account started, I had estimated an amount for every month where i didint have a statements and some were older than 6 years.

 

We discussed the limitations act and why i thought the court would see it my way and he checked for earlier charges.

 

HTH

 

GLenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Glen,

i dont know about you but ive found that MBNA can be very aggressive when ringing me , when they rang to get a paymt as id missed it they asked for a post dated card paymt, i agreeded and assumed it would go through, but the following wk a lady rang to ask for double the paymt amd when i told her that id already paid by post dated paymt she said that it wasnt done and now i owe double, which i coulnt pay so i offered an amount i could afford there and then but she refused. She said she wanted the double amount only i said i couldnt afford it or it would put me over my O/D and she said thats NOT HER PROBLEM !and that if i didnt pay it i would be charged late paymt fees again, i tried to explaine that it was pointless cos the more they charged me the more i coulnt pay and that we'd get nowhere but she said she didnt care and wanted paymt , when i asked her name she refused and said it didnt matter as she would pass my acct on to debt reclaime dpt. I heard nothing for a while then i got a post card from a RMA, saying that a Mr GREEN would be calling on friday between 8am & 7pm so wondering what it was all about i rang the no. on it and found out it was a debt collector ! the guy said he wanted £165 over the phone to stop "Mr Green comming to the house" when i said i couldnt pay at that time but could pay in 2 days time by phone he refused and said that Mr Green would be there on Fri, i explained that i would be at work, he said then Mr Green would come back sat and sun till he got the money. I said thats fine i could pay him then, i asked for his name and again he refused !. On sat am i waited till 11ish then rang number the guy said that they only wanted £79.75 from me and that no one would be there to collect money at the wk end, when i asked his name he told me and after i'd paid the amount he thanked me and said good bye. He didnt seem to know why i as asked for £165 in the first place ?? Du know if anyone else has had this sort of hassle with MBNA ??

 

Hi I had similiar issues with MBNA using aggressive tactics to obtain payment. Thankfully nothing was ever passed to Debt Collectors, but I often got snotty calls, sometimes upto 5-6 a day to my mobile and home number demanding payment. When I tried to discuss the situation in a reserved manner, It was always "we don't care about your problems and the fact you have no money, pay us now, right now". Thankfully I managed to get out of all that predicament, but I still sometimes think back to the mental pressure than was applied during my times of hardship. Now claiming back over a grand! MBNA will always be a company I'll remember who are the most unrealistic and uncompromsing I've ever dealt with and I'm glad I'm suing them for money they owe me now. Needless to say, I will never ever have a credit card again. I was young at 18 and got into a lot of trouble. I applied online, received the card within days and the rest is history. My Visa Debit does everything I require of it now..

Regards

 

 

S

 

 

Halifax PLC - £607 - SETTLED IN FULL

Halifax Card Services - £1142 - SETTLED IN FULL

 

MBNA Europe - £842 - SETTLED IN FULL + INTEREST!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Spuddy,

i thought i was imagining it all ! am going to send off DPA letter tomorrow to get some of the charges back if i can ...let me know how your doing with your claim a ??

 

 

 

Sandrajl x

1st letter to Abbey requesting statements 10/08/06

Reply from Abbey..Sorry on Microfiche..cant do 18/08/06

2nd letter to Abbey Microfiche argument letter R/D 23/08/06

Received 16 Statements from Abbey 23/0806

Reply from Abbey.. enclosed complaints leaflet 2/08/06

Phone call from abbey Re my account 20.55hrs 5/09/06

Letter to MBNA requesting statements 6/9/06

Sent off Data Protection Act letter to MBNA 2/10/06

Sent off Non Compliance letter to P Speed 3/10/06

Cover letter & 5yrs statements received 9/10/06

Received letter from MBNA saying they had reduced limit 9/10/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

I then set out a schedule of chagres and costs :

 

Fee for SAR £10.00

Letters x 6 @ £6.75 each

Postage x 6 @ £1.00

Charges

Interest paid @ 16.9%

Contractual @ 22.9% compunded from date of each chrg.

 

 

I'm about to phone MBNA and hit them for everything I can, but I'd be grateful for a bit of clarification...

 

I get the "Contractual @ 22.9%" bit (by changing Vamp's spreadsheet from 8% TO 22.9%) but I'm not sure where you get the " Interest paid @ 16.9%" from and in what order to apply them.

 

If you have a moment, could you elaborate for me please?

 

Thanks

 

SirOweALot

BOS CC1 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 14/9/06

BOS CC2 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 14/9/06

FD CC SAR sent 14/9/06, PAR sent 10/10/06 claiming £457, sodoff letter rec'd 25/10/06, LBA sent 26/10/06

MBNA CC SAR sent 14/9/06, reply 22/9/06 looking into it, sodoff letter +£400 GW rec'd 13/10/06

 

Let Battle Commence...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically the interest you pay on your credit card balance is typcially around 16.9%.

 

So you have paid this or a similar amount on the charges. This is difficult to work out but MBNA can work it out and this is what they have been doing for people.

 

In my case i estimated and i think I lost around £100 as a result.

 

Anyway when you have your charges and have a value for the interest charged then you can use a spreadssheet to calculate the interest at the cash advance value of 22.4%.

 

YOu cannot use vampiress standard spreadsheets, or more to the point you can but you will lose out.

 

You need the spreadsheet from Vampiress site accessed from a link in her singature or use the one produced by MINDZAI from a link in his signature.

 

Use these sheets wil compound the interest. The difference between that and the simple interest is signficant.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

 

PS better to take another day or two getting your figures sorted and any arguments you want to use about why you should get what youre asking for, it will be worth it.

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aah, I get it now, thanks for taking the time to explain.

 

As it happens, my monthly interest rate and cash advance are the same (1.8735% per month or 24.95% annually) so in my particular case, Vampiress' sheet will work.

 

I'm collating the various comments from various threads at the moment... I've kept 3 years of statements, and SAR'd for the rest. As soon as these drop on the mat, I'll be good to go :)

 

Sorry to hijack your thread and well done on the win over MBNA!

BOS CC1 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 14/9/06

BOS CC2 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 14/9/06

FD CC SAR sent 14/9/06, PAR sent 10/10/06 claiming £457, sodoff letter rec'd 25/10/06, LBA sent 26/10/06

MBNA CC SAR sent 14/9/06, reply 22/9/06 looking into it, sodoff letter +£400 GW rec'd 13/10/06

 

Let Battle Commence...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly Vampiress standard spreadsheet wont compound the interest, you still need one that does that.

 

Its not the rate of interest its the way its applied thats critical here.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

MBNA are settling and short changing many people.

 

Before agreeing to settle make sure you get your full entitlement it may make a lot of difference to you.

 

Make sure you know the full amount you are entitled to before ringing them.

 

I set out a schedule of charges and costs and faxed this to them so they knew what i wanted in order to settle my claim.

 

My schedule included the following:

 

Fee for S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) £10.00

Letters x 6 @ £6.75 each

Postage x 6 @ £1.00

Charges

Interest I had paid on the charges @ 16.9%

Contractual @ 22.9% compounded from date of each chrg on the charges and interest I had paid.

 

The point of listing this is that during the discussions it became clear that they didn't intend to add the interest I was charging them.

 

The interest they told me i was due was only the interest I had paid. I argued that I thought the court would see it differently.

 

All I would say to those claiming and talking to MBNA is make sure you know what you are intending to claim and don't accept anything else. Have your arguments ready about why you should have them and be prepared for them to argue.

 

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please ignore... I read the thread again and answered my own question :roll:

BOS CC1 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 14/9/06

BOS CC2 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 14/9/06

FD CC SAR sent 14/9/06, PAR sent 10/10/06 claiming £457, sodoff letter rec'd 25/10/06, LBA sent 26/10/06

MBNA CC SAR sent 14/9/06, reply 22/9/06 looking into it, sodoff letter +£400 GW rec'd 13/10/06

 

Let Battle Commence...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Glen,

 

The costs you have applied to your letters - £6.75 per letter. Is this a standard fee or a figure you feel is fair in the courts mind?

 

I've done my deal with MBNA unfortunately, but am currently helping my sister out with hers and am interested to see how you dealt with yours.

 

I must say that so far, of the 6 banks I've dealt with, MBNA have been the best - strange, I hate them in every other way!!!

.

Barclays - £268 - Moneyclaim

Capital One - £172 - Moneyclaim

Abbey (2nd claim) - Moneyclaim

---------------------------------------------------

 

HSBC - £2164.46- PAID IN FULL

MBNA - £471 - PAID IN FULL

NatWest - £307 - PAID IN FULL

Abbey Business - £314.15 - PAID IN FULL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gordon

 

No its not what i feel is fair, my professional charge out rate varies between 135 - 175 (edit i wish 1750 !) per hour, this rate was determined following a thread and apparently a litigant in person can charge half the rate of a legal professional (solicitor i think?)

 

I think the thread was called something like 'can we charge them for our letters?'

 

JonChris posted info about charges and the charge per letter was 6.75 and hourly rate was 9.00 odd. To charge the hourly rate you need to keep notes and I haven't done that.

 

I would check the thread out for yourself so you can see where it comes from. Of course if you go through small claims then its unlikely the court would award costs, but hey pre court you can tell them thats what you want and if its fast track then i guess its worth making a schedule and asking the court to approve it when you win.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

-1750 per hour

 

 

Blimey, I hope this was a typo!

 

Thanks again. I'll follow up on that thread. I think I read it a while back, but maybe I'll update myself.

.

Barclays - £268 - Moneyclaim

Capital One - £172 - Moneyclaim

Abbey (2nd claim) - Moneyclaim

---------------------------------------------------

 

HSBC - £2164.46- PAID IN FULL

MBNA - £471 - PAID IN FULL

NatWest - £307 - PAID IN FULL

Abbey Business - £314.15 - PAID IN FULL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to butt in, but i notice Glen UK that MBNA provided charges prior to 6 years ago. My understanding is you can only make a claim going back 6 years? Is this correct?

Happiness is not in the mere possession of money; it lies in the joy of achievement, in the thrill of creative effort.

 

Franklin D. Roosevelt

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Miss Joy

 

the limitations Act includes sec 5 i think it is that states that you cannot sue for a contractual breach more than 6 years old.

 

Fortunately Sec 32 says that where the defendant has concealed the nature of their breach of you made a mistake then the limitations applies from when you could or should have discovered the breach and then you have six years to sue from that date.

 

Most take the publication of the OFTs report into Cc charges as the start date from which you have 6 years to sue.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glenn UK, thats a really good explanation but youve forgotten im thick...:confused:

 

lol:lol:

 

Can i claim from 6 years back from now though? Thank you for your answer, its appreciated ;):)

Happiness is not in the mere possession of money; it lies in the joy of achievement, in the thrill of creative effort.

 

Franklin D. Roosevelt

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO you can claim back as far as you want, the six years is looking forward from april 2006 so you have until april 2012 to enter your claim for all the unlawful charges they took from you.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

  • Confused 1

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow... Thats about 10 years of charges.... That will run into about £2000 + interest to be added for me im sure... Thank you GlenUK

Happiness is not in the mere possession of money; it lies in the joy of achievement, in the thrill of creative effort.

 

Franklin D. Roosevelt

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Missjoy

 

You should however research the Limitations Act particuallry sec 32 since the banks will say you cant claim that far back so you need to be ready with your arguments as to why you can.

 

HTH

 

glenn

  • Haha 1

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...