Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Credit search will be for address varification in case you'd moved since the date of the speculative invoice I expect.  If you use our enhanced Google search box for.  Pcm Claimform, there are over 1000 threads that outline things.  Next for you will be ack from the court your defence has been registered OK.  To be frank.. If you'd been doing that from when advised a month ago, this would not have happened.  You've had a very very lucky escape here.... Now prepare and not allow another to happen.  We don't have the time to nurse maid those that don't self help.   Dx  
    • Thanks @FTMDavefor the quick and clear instructions.  All filed and submitted.  What should I be preparing next? If you’ve seen lots of cases with this lot what is likely their next move?   In the meantime they have been sending me letters offering me to pay them without going to court etc. i’ve also received a notification on my credit report about searches and can see that they’ve done a “soft search” on my file.   Are they allowed to do that? Why would they be doing that?
    • Just be aware that foliage covering signs is not persuasive if you reside in the area and regularly used the said route concerned.  One gentleman of recent, famous for disputing parking and speeding issues, just cost his client £1000's claiming that!!    Dx  
    • Thanks for your reply.  I will DM you this evening with more info, when I've got it all to hand.  
    • No, it clarifies nothing. As you say, there is a contradiction in that this company's employees have received invoices yet it is assumed they called the parking company in. I would suspect - and it is only a suspicion - that someone else called in the parking company to "manage" the whole estate. While you are dealing with this verbally anyone can come out with any old baloney and you'll have no proof of it.  You need a paper trail.  So e-mail the company, pointing out the reasons for your meeting with them and that you were not abusing the car park, and request they get the ticket cancelled.  That way they will have to reply in writing and you can get to the bottom of this matter.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

1st credit and Lloyds TSB Platinum credit card


hunterandthehunted
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4881 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Now, that is interesting, personally...

 

i note that they are actually customising the letters they are sending me;) LOL.

 

 

Your assignment specifies that it is the assignee of only the benefits of the account... therefore, it is an equitable and not legal assignment. another little thing to note is that s136 of LOPA 1925 does not actually say they do not need to produce the document of assignment; it is entirely neutral on that point.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 631
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

thanks tomterm8,

 

i don't really understand though, i thought that if they acquired the debt from lloyds they are entitled to provide the paperwork which goes with it.

 

take a look at this letter.....

 

with a contract there are benefits (i.e. things you recieve) and burdens ( i.e. things you must do). 1st credit say that they own the benefits of the contract, but have none of the burdens.

There is a particular form of assignment that covers this case... equitable assignment ... rather than legal assignment which requires both benefits and burdens to be assigned.

They couldn't take you to court on your own, they would need to be joined in an action with the original creditor. (i.e. both credior and first credit would need to sue you).

it's quite a technical legal point.

regards

 

hunterandthehunte

:D

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hunterandthehunted, I really wouldn't be concerned... I've seen 1st credits contract; 1st credit has a contractual right to this info.

 

if Lloyds don't comply, it means they simply don't have the credit agreement.

 

Frankly, what they are saying to you is BS of the finest order.

 

don't forget, you can CCA Lloyds TSB direct, since they still have the obligations of the contract.

  • Haha 1

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a bet. It doesn't normally matter if the client is not in default; even if they default, 90% of people don't know the CCA 1974, and so for every 10,000 agreements you might get a single CCA request.

 

Until a few years ago, the cost of scanning and storing 10,000 credit agreements was substantially higher than the cost of losing the 5p in a pound that a normal assignment brings in.

 

( BTW, this is just my opinion, not the opinion of the CAG team).

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can an expert answer this please???

 

much appreciated

 

hunterandthehunted

 

A notice of assignment can come from either party.

 

it is important to look at what the assignment covers... if it is from first credit, then it will cover the rights and not the obligations of the contract, which is important.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Most DCAs will take the money if you have a DD set up... Maybe they have sold it to some one else, or returned it to the creditor?

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
thanks for your response tomterm,

 

can they sell it on if the account is in dispute?

In theory no, in practice the OFT guidance does not seem to stop them.

they still have not took the monthly payment at time of writing. would it be unreasonable of me to ignore it, should i send a cheque perhaps?, after all the DD is still active. would they be able to take a double payment next month, or even a triple payment the month after that.

i would be tempted to cancel the DD at your bank.

also while i am here, the time limit for my CCA request is up on the 9th of march and basically would like to know what to do next.

Wait.

is there a template letter i could use to let them now that this account is now in dispute?

Personally, I would not send them a further letter until they send you something further

thanks in advance...

 

hunterandthehunted

 

If you do need to send them a letter, something short and to the point:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re: Ac no XXXX

 

With regard to the above account, i sent you a formal request for the original credit agreement on DATE. You recieved it on DATE. I have cancelled the direct debit, and will cease payments until you provided it, as I am entitled to do so under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

I will resume payments once you provided it, as required by law.

 

Yours Faithfully,

 

XXXX (type don't sign)

 

personally, i would wait for a month or two though without sending further letters.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...