Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank Dx , Im guessing its a waiting game for now .
    • Hey Fkofile , Im one of those that have been affected by it ! i made a post about it . my credit score has already been affected by it .
    • We initially raised a complaint with the finance company who told us that as its over 6 months the consumer rights act won’t apply and we would need to provide evidence of the problem being there at purchase. As we have only just got the report from Mercedes we haven’t been able to submit this within their 14 day timeframe. Is this not the case then? Thanks
    • The previously little-known Chinese-American businessman’s fortune was transformed by the British taxpayer through 11 government contracts worth approximately £4.3bn for lateral flow tests (LFTs) made in China and sold by Innova. Charles Huang says contracts generated $2bn (£1.6Bn) profit   The government fast-tracked the company after its British representatives sent a direct email to Dominic Cummings, the chief adviser to the then prime minister, Boris Johnson, in July 2020. And, a Guardian investigation has found, the fast-tracking of Innova was supported by the then chancellor Rishi Sunak’s team at the Treasury. Innova became for a period of at least four critical months the only company authorised to supply rapid Covid tests in the UK, despite scores of others developing similar kits. At the time, the government spending watchdog raised concerns   Boss of US firm given £4bn in UK Covid contracts accused of squandering millions on jets and properties | Coronavirus | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Exclusive: Rishi Sunak’s team helped fast-track deal with firm founded by Charles Huang, who says contracts generated $2bn profit  
    • Welcome to the forum What makes you think that ?   Andy
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Position Selected For Redundancy - Advice Needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5516 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Today I was made redundant. Three weeks ago i received a letter whilst at work stating that my position within the company had been selected for potential redundancy. It said that if possible they would offer me an alternative position within the company. This was on a Friday and the letter stated there would be a meeting on the Tuesday with the managing director of the company and another manager. I attended the Tuesday meeting which lasted approximately 5 minutes where the letter was basically repeated back to me. Then i was told there would be another meeting the following monday at noon and they would inform me of their decision. Later that day (Tuesday), for reasons unknown, the managing director resigned effective immediately. On the monday nobody showed for the meeting and i opted to keep quiet and not ask why the meeting had not taken place (I wasn't about to pursue my redundancy). Nothing more was mentioned....until today! A manager approached me and told me the company director wanted to see me. I asked what it was regarding and i was told that he didn't know. He sat in on the meeting and i was informed that i was being made redundant and given one weeks notice as they were unable to offer me another position within the company.

 

Apart from living through the past 3 weeks with the worry of a potential redundancy notice constantly on my mind, what made this even harder to swallow was that they employed somebody else 2 days before handing me my potential redundancy letter. I had mentioned this at the first meeting and asked how they could employ somebody on the Wednesday and hand me a notice of potential redundancy on the Friday. I was told "different area of the company" to which i reminded them that they had stated in the letter that they would offer me another position if they were able and asked them why that position wasn't made available to me. I was offered no answer to this question.

 

A little more information :

 

I had been with the company for 11 months.

I was working as a labourer ( The person employed 2 days before i received the letter is also employed as a labourer only in a different area of the company).

The only correspondence i have regarding the redundancy is the letter i was initially given.

 

I am very angry at the way this has been handled. The incompetence of the company and complete disregard for a employee has left me feeling extremely bitter.

 

Do i have a case for unfair dismissal?

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest wino

Hold on in there nugget79,

I'm sure someone will give you some advise soon. Some people with the knowledge to help you will be at work at the moment.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its quite a grey area on redundancies if you've not been with the company for 12 months or more.

You are entitled to an explanation as to why you've been m ade redundant when they took someone else on and you weren't offered that position especially as it was a labouring job just the same.

I know its hardd to be made redundant its happend to me twice in as many years.

It may be worth a word with CAB they know about redundancy.

Hang in there I'm sure there will be someone with more knowledge along later. If you don't get any response suggest you click on the triangle and a mod will come along and see if they can help.

DG:)

I have no legal training my knowledge comes from my personal life experiences

Please help keep the forum alive by making a donation

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...