Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Question about amount of arrears CAp1 Card


wilko1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4874 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In June 2006 I went on a payment plan with Cap One paying £4/mth. The debt was over £6K. After June I only received a couple of statements but I noticed the amount of arrears was going up in big chunks. I asked for a copy of my agreement in November ’08, which they failed to supply. They defaulted me last week, I noticed the arrears amount was over £6K only a few pounds less than the balance. Could this be correct? If they keep adding to the arrears it will be more than the balance this time next month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would request said statements coz even with a meagre grasp on maths the fact that you are paying monies yet the debt aint going down would need a little explaining.

 

ask them (in writing) for statements of the accounts

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trying to establish if the amount of arrears on the default notice can be challenged, thereby rendering the default notice invalid. I was on a payment plan with them for 2 years, it seems that they were adding about £200/mth onto the arrears during the time I was on the plan. Can I argue that the default notice is invalid because nothing should have been added on to the arrears amount while I was paying the £4/mth payment plan.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

My wife has just received a copy of her Experian credit report. In it there is a part for Financial Associate searches. It shows that Lowell has searched her report because she is a financial associate of mine.

The report gives info re financial associate searches i.e. “Financial associate searches show when your credit report information has been seen because someone you are financially connected to has made an application for credit.”

Lowell bought a disputed account of mine from Cap One, about the time of the search. I haven’t made an application for credit.

Are Lowell entitled to search my wife’s credit report, have they breached data protection or broken any laws, what can I do about it.

Any help advice or comments would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I was wondering if anyone could help to formulate a complaint to possibly the ICO re the following situation.

I lost my job and stopped making payments on a Cap One card. I then found out that they didn’t have an enforceable agreement. Lowell bought the account, and did a credit search on me and also on my wife, the card was in my name only. I looked on the Experian site about financial associate searches. It states, when someone applies for credit their financial associates file can be searched. I was miffed because I hadn’t applied for credit and yet Experian had allowed Lowell to look at my wife’s credit file.

I asked both of them for an explanation but they just fobbed me off and said that no-one else could see that her file had been searched.

I don’t believe that Experian had any right to allow Lowell to view my wife’s data. I would value opinions as to whether I have grounds to take the complaint further? Who to? And how would I word it.

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...