Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

two tickets in 2 days for parking on single yellow lines, sounds stupid i know


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5544 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hey all,

 

i live in an area which has recently been built up, alot of new flats have been sold and in a short space of time alot of people have moved into the area, but no extra parking has been provided meaning most nights im forced to park on a single yellow line, which by law i can park on between the hours of 6pm-8pm. the car is usually moved by 8.30 as that is when i leave for work, however yesterday when i left my house at 8.30 i found a parking ticket which had been issued 5 minutes early, wasn't too happy but was prepared to pay it. when i got back fom work still no parking available so i parked in the same spot (stupid i know) assuming that as i'd been parking there for so long previously what were the chances of te patrolmen doing the same roads 2 days in a row, but desided i would try and leave early just incase. so i got out of my house at 08.08 only to find that a second ticket had been issued. the partolman had spotted my car at 08.01 and issued the ticket at 08.06, im guessin the a***ole had spotted my car even before his shift began and just wanted to teach me a lesson.

now the first ticket is bad enough but the second ticket and the timing of it really p***ed me off and ive decided to contest it. i was wondering if anybody could give me some advice, thanks

 

the council is bristol and i was parked on one yellow line, (just went out to have a look at the parking restrictions sign and it is highly faded and barely visable unless you stand right up close directly infront of it)

 

any advice would be most appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree.

for a council ticket to hold up three things must be true.

the wording of the PCN must comply with statute.

the signs and lines must be compliant.

the TRO must be valid.

some councils fail on all three but failing on any of them is enough. we need to see pictures of the PCN (suitably washed of personal details) and of the sings and lines to start with

Link to post
Share on other sites

You parked in contavention fo the signage. You have no defence.

 

 

Your posts don't generally seem to offer any help Britainsworstdriver. As my mam used to say, if you ain't got anything good to say, don't say anything at all." :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You parked in contavention fo the signage. You have no defence.

 

A bit of a sweeping statement I think. Lamma is quite correct. You may be lucky - get the old PCN up for everyone to have a butchers.

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...