Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting question regarding what Government accounts opposition parties have access to, before an General Election. From what I understand, Government department accounts that are published are always lagging behind and would not include some amounts which are classified as 'commercially sensitive'.  Therefore opposition parties and Parliamentrary select committees would not have access to accounts which contain real time up to date information. If a new Government have found £20 billion of spending liabilities they did not know about, this could be true, as £20 billion is not that much when you look at total Government expenditure. Government department are making decisions on spending all of the time and it could be the previous Government were planning tax changes and/or spending cuts to balance the books.  Jeremy Hunt has recently said that if the Tories had stayed in Government and held an Autumn budget, it would have been very difficult to cut taxes as some had wanted.
    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

B'card CCA re: MStanley


Turia
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5588 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I'm relatively new here and have been reading a lot of the posts and threads but this is the first time I have posted anything so be gentle ;) Initially i started checkin this website as I want to start reclaiming missold PPI on many cards and a loan, however I've noticed a lot of people have started proceedings to get there previous MStanley debt unenforcable now that B'card has taken the debt over.

 

My first question is: Why are they doing this? I am also in the same situation in that I had a MS card which is now a B'card. But has B'card done something illegal by taking over the debts? Or is it just that we didnt physically sign an agreement by them..? Just wondering why everyone's doing it and if I should jump on the bandwagon - so to speak.

 

My gut feel is that a debt is a debt , i took it and spent it (perhaps not the wisest of things to do at the time, as now i'm desperately trying to pay it off) and as such should be paid no matter what... Dunno if im missing something essential so would be interested to hear people's thoughts.

 

My second question is: I've also got a Lloyds TSB card which used to be an easymoney card and got transferred in the same way.. so is that a similar situation also? In that are people also trying to get the debt voided?

 

I've seen many people write that the debt doesn't get written off, but its not enforced, so what happens to it? It just sits there on your credit file for ever? Just trying to get my head around this CCA issue as to be honest I had never even heard of it until i saw all the hundreds of posts on here.

 

Thanks for reading!! :)

 

Turia

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Turia and welcome to CAG. Good to see you've started posting instead of lurking. ;)

 

Each person must decide for themselves whether to honour their debt or not. The trouble is, if you write to BC now and say "I'm having trouble, can you stop adding charges and interest for 3 or 6 months so I can clear some of the capital", their reply is invariably NO !

 

In theory, if they fail to provide a valid and enforceable Credit Agreement in response to a proper request, you can repay the debt at a rate that suits you with no charges or int't being added. No defaults should be put against you either.

 

And, if you decide NOT to repay the debt at all, there's little they can do about it, apart from continue to hassle you and put negative markers on your credit records.

 

This goes for all the credit cards - there's nothing special about BC taking over MS or other cards. If BC have the MS Agreement, the debt may be enforceable. But BC, like all the other cards, seem to NOT have the Agreements for their OWN cards, let alone he ones they've taken over.

 

Turning to your own case, you want to pay the a/c's off. So firstly check to see if you have penalty charges and PPI to reclaim, thereby reducing each debt.

 

Then you can check to see if they have a valid Agreement for the a/c. If not, they SHOULD stop adding int't and chgs, so you're just repaying the balance, with no new charges. But they won't agree the a/c is In Dispute and will carry on adding int't and chgs.

 

So your only other option is to look at the CPR approach - read the first few posts from Link No2 in my signature below.

 

This can lead to you seeking a court ruling on the (non)enforceability of the agreement, leaving you free to repay, as said before, at a rate you can afford with no nasty consequences - that's the theory anyway. :)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick,

 

Thanks for that response it's clarified a lot for me. Funnily enough, similar to what you wrote, I did actually get in touch with B'card and I asked for them to Reduce the interest rate (didnt even think to ask them to stop interest altogether!!) and they not only refused but were Extremely rude and threatened to shut my account down :s

 

It's very frustrating .

 

My fear and desperate worry is any negative markers they put on the credit file. I do want to pay the debt off, just struggling a bit atm... So am going to go and read through your link that you mentioned.

 

Thanks again!!

 

T

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Slick,

 

I've been busy reading and resarching and am now in the process of writing up my SAR and sending it off. I do have a query though, after the credit card company (lloyds TSB) hopefully send me a list of all my charges that i've incurred, can i also reclaim PPI in the same letter that i ask for my charges back?

 

many thanks

 

Turia

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Turia,

 

I suggest you deal with the refund of penalty charges in isolation.

 

Set up another thread in the PPI forum to d/w this aspect of your complaint with BC. They are separate issues and involve different legal bases.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...