Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Finance U Ltd Car Repossession letter received **Round 1 WON... Ding, ding... Round 2 now on**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3954 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 583
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Good Point

 

 

If The Two Of You Received Two Seperate N1 Claim Forms

Then He Will Have To Pay 400 Quid

 

Thats A Shame:D

 

Make Sure Both Aq Go Back To The Court If Two Seperate Claims On Two N1 Claim Forms

 

Sorry If Repeating Myself

 

Need This To Be Correct

Link to post
Share on other sites

nowajose

 

remember what i told you

 

the claiment needs to spend 200 quid on an allocation questionair

 

in your case 400 as your other half got a claim form

 

now unless by 4 pm on the 24 august the court does not receive the 400 quid

 

YOU WIN

 

GAME OVER:-D:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its Ok Nowayjose

 

They Are Stuffed And Know It

 

It Will Be 400 Quid Down The Drain To Continue

 

If They Had Any Sense He Would Call It A Day Because Its No Surender On This One

 

All Or Nothing

No Quarter Given

Link to post
Share on other sites

any claim below five grand is normally allocated to small claims

 

as this is over five grand, a judge has decided the claim be allocated fast track

 

we can now demand more indepth documentation and the claiment has to comply

 

this is starting to get very expensive for the claiment

 

this will be a first for me, fast track so we have plenty of time and wait for more replies from people who have done fast track

 

they are still stuffed by the way and as i said before

 

ime with you all the way

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know i keep saying this but

 

dont panic

its all in hand

 

as ive said before

 

ime with you to the very end and there is still plenty of time

 

lets make him sweat for a change

 

its in the bag

believe me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent Pm Nowayjose

 

Message For Any Visitors

Bring It On

 

Not Lost One Yet

 

MY LAST OPPONENT IN COURT WAS A BARRISTER FOR A FT SE 250 COMPANY

 

HAD HIM DUSTED IN 30 MINUTES

 

QUITE FANCY A TRIP TO WALES

 

BY THE WAY

 

 

DEFAULT NOTICE IS STILL CRAP

GAME OVER

 

SINCE WHEN HAS ASKING FOR LEGAL ADVICE BEEN PREJUDICIAL

 

BE VERY CAREFUL ON WHAT YOU SAY OR INFER

Edited by postggj
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

nowayjose

 

my thread in the bear garden was not directed at you i can assure you of that

 

its a troll on one of my welcome threads pumping me for infomation.

 

i think we let emotions get the better of us and jumped to conclusions

 

all i can say

 

friends again:)

 

can you pm me the latest updates

 

thanks for jumping in spam

Link to post
Share on other sites

well done

 

one person who stuck all the way

 

i take it they did not produce the docs then

default notice did it me thinks

 

well with costs i believe that was 12 hundred quid

 

they cant go after you ever again now

its over

 

want to screw them for a wasted costs order

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi nowayjose

 

seems he Is a but peeved off

go for the costs and he can frack off.

he has no chance on a second claim.

as by court action the account was terminated.

he cant issue a second claim with out the permission of the court

 

NOT A CHANCE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Discontinuance and subsequent proceedings

38.7 A claimant who discontinues a claim needs the permission of the court to make another claim against the same defendant if –

(a) he discontinued the claim after the defendant filed a defence; and (b) the other claim arises out of facts which are the same or substantially the same as those relating to the discontinued claim.

top.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3954 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...