Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Followed up with letter which is no surprise as I’m easy to find via electoral roll. Letter says we have been asked to recover from you on behalf f our client in Middle East x amount. if you believe you are not liable please contact us - yeah right! If you wish to make payment here are our client bank details which look genuine and relate directly to a Dubai bank. ” if you don’t engage our client may take further action” etc blah blah blah. its the same type phrases used by CWD/IDRWW/IDR etc…..   I ignored the email, blocked the text number and will wait to see if I receive any formal action via Mail but seems like the same tactic I’ve seen for 10 years plus and I’ve ignored all. just for people’s info
    • Hi. I expect the experts will be along later to advise you. In the meantime, I've amended your thread title to show the car park name and location. HB
    • i can instruct my gof to sit, but if it does is an entirely diff matter. WL are acting here as a DCA and are not the OWNER of the debt, lowells are, so jog on WL... until very very recent we've never seen lowells raise a scottish claim Lowell/Shoes SPC Claim Forfar Sheriff Court - Old Newday Credit Card. - Scotland Financial Legal Issues - Consumer Action Group  
    • Visiting scotland I came across a car park at The Falls of Shin operated by Civil Enforcement Limited. The car park requires visitors to pay using the awful Phone and Pay app or over the phone using an eqully terrible automated service. Their signs state a time limit of 10 minutes after arriving to pay, and both methods require needlessly lengthy registration process only for payment to be rejected when attempting to pay by both. The Cafe were able to offer us some assistance and register our vehicle so hopefully we sould avoid a fine but this seems like entrapment and would still stop us returning again. How is this legal without giving visitors the option to pay on site?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CL Finance / Howard Cohenn.. Help Needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5201 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I'm hoping someone can help me out please?

 

Originally I had a Marbles card taken out in 2002, I found myself in finacial difficulties in 2005 and agreed a reduced repayment with Marbles (HFC bank) for £20 per month.

Around june 2008 I recieved a letter from a company called CL finace requesting payment £20 or legal action will be taken against me. I phoned CL finance they told me they now owend the debt from HFC and I should now pay them. I continued to pay HFC for the next month then I recieved a N1 court claim from howard coheen on behalf of CL finance claiming £5100 the amount i owed HFC.

After seeking advice from citizens advice I defended the claim and also after seeing this great web site I sent in a CCA request.

CL Finance sent me a response saying they will provide me with the information as soon as they can.

I then recieved the allocation questioner from the court which i filled in a returned.

after about 2 weeks the case was struck out as howard coheen had not returned thier allocation questioner.

 

I recieved a letter from howard coheen 12th Jan 09 stating that they did not want to pursue legal actiona and that payments should continue at £20.

 

I have sent CL finance a default notice for the CCA request sent.

 

I had a call from CL finance stating that I should continue payments and the default notice for the CCA request was not valid. I advised them that I would not discuss this over the phone and they should sent it to me in writing.

I've not recieved anything yet and feel i need to send them something?

Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are playing games with you, send them a letter along the lines,

 

This matter has already been the subject of a court claim, by yourselves, the case being struck out by the Honourable Judge xxxxxxxx on DATE, the claim number being xxxxxxxx, i do not expect to hear from again

Yours etc

 

end of

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Creditcard mug..

just one last question before I send it off.

My defence for the last claim was not based on the fact that no credit aggrement was in exsistance athough i did request it during the claim, the defence was based on the fact that I had not missed a payment to HFC.

 

I get the feeling that Cohens are going to send another claim through anytime.

 

If your letter advise still applies its in the post tomorrow.

 

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if they came up with an agreement, then the basic facts would change, so they may be able to convince the court to allow them to bring a fresh claim.

Cross that one when you come to it, still send the letter

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Howard Cohen & co finally go in touch.

 

I recieved a letter today which states the following

 

Dear Mr*******

 

RE: CL Finance LTD and Yourself - Balance £****.**

 

Northampton - 8XXXXXXX89

 

it is with concern that we note you have not made payment of this debt as arranged.

 

Further delay cannot be tolerated and you should note that if a remittance is not received at this office BY RETURN OF POST our instructions are to apply to the Court for Judgement to be entered against you. If this course of action is necessary further costs will be incurred which you will be responsible.

These costs will be added to the judgement debt.

 

We trust that the above mentioned action will not be necessary but should we no receive payment no further notice will be given.

 

If you wish to discuss this matter please telephone 0870 751 3281

 

Yours faithfully

 

Howard Cohen & Co

 

 

 

 

 

It looks like a standard letter to me, what do you think I should do now?

They are claim number is the same number that was struck out.

Edited by Helpmeoutplease
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got the court order striking out the case? if yes then this letter must have been sent either by an office junior or an idiot

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure that I recieved anything i writing from the court, I phoned them the day after the deadline day and they told me it had been struck out. I then recieved a letter from Cohen's saying they were not pursuing legal action as long as i paid £20 per month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phone the court tomorrow to double check, ask them to send you a copy of the judges order, theres no point in considering a next move until we have this

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been in touch with the courts and the case was struck out, they will be sending a letter out to me. I asked if howard cohen should still be refering to the claim number on there letters and the court said they could apply to the judge to re-open the claim.

But for now the claim is struck out.

So what next

Link to post
Share on other sites

They would have EXTREME difficulty in trying to resurrect this, not least because you would object to it

 

My advice ignore them for now, unless they involve the court again, if they do we can go for them (highly unlikely)

 

Once you have that court order in your hands, you are home and dry IMO

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I recieved a letter from the court which states:

 

 

Before An Officer Of The Court sitting at Northampton County Court Northampton NN1 3QH.

 

Upon non compliance with court order of the 05 January 2009

 

IT IS ORDERED that

 

The claim is struck out.

 

Dated 13 March 2009

 

 

 

Now I have this letter what do you suggest my next action should be, does this now mean they have no more legal power to hassle me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I recieved a letter from the court which states:

 

 

Before An Officer Of The Court sitting at Northampton County Court Northampton NN1 3QH.

 

Upon non compliance with court order of the 05 January 2009

 

IT IS ORDERED that

 

The claim is struck out.

 

Dated 13 March 2009

 

 

 

 

 

Now I have this letter what do you suggest my next action should be, does this now mean they have no more legal power to hassle me?

 

Two options claim your costs against them, or ignore anything else they send, there's really nothing they can do and they know it...well done

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

well my friends at howard cohen have been in touch again today, i recieved a letter almost identical to the last one

 

Dear Mr*******

 

 

RE: CL Finance LTD and Yourself - Balance £****.**

 

 

Northampton - 8XXXXXXX89

 

 

it is with concern that we note you have not made payment of this debt as arranged.

 

 

Further delay cannot be tolerated and you should note that if a remittance is not received at this office BY RETURN OF POST our instructions are to apply to the Court for Judgement to be entered against you. If this course of action is necessary further costs will be incurred which you will be responsible.

These costs will be added to the judgement debt.

 

 

We trust that the above mentioned action will not be necessary but should we no receive payment no further notice will be given.

 

 

If you wish to discuss this matter please telephone 0870 751 3281

 

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

Howard Cohen & Co

 

 

The amount of money owed has gone up 2% in 17 days.

 

This letter is dated 20th March.

 

It looks like they decided to give me further notice, how nice of them!!

 

The claim number is the same as the one struck out.

 

Any advise on what to do, is it worth sending them a letter stating that the debt is in disbute and the claim has already been struck out?

Or do i just keep ridding the storm and see what happens?

Edited by Helpmeoutplease
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...