Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • no that is not a defence. because you don't have a photo
    • I purchased the vehicle using finance through motonovo under a HP 60 months agreement. I have now amended the document ensuring all is in black. Unfortunately, this email has now been sent. However, I have not sent a letter to big motoring world. Also, I have taken the section of the firealarm issue. I am struggling to convert to PDF. I am not tech savy at all. My mistake was that the the salesman was very fussy on a sale. We went down a quiet road for a little test drive and not for a lengthy road test. The water issue was not present at this moment of time. However, it only became prevalent after driving away, after all docs signed. I did stated to Audi I wanted a diagnostic report. However, they carried out an Audicam which is footage of the issue. Audi have diagnosed the issue as a common issue where coupes/cabriolets accumulate water in the seals. However, I did state beforehand for no issue to be rectified due to me wanting to reject the vehicle. I am awaiting a report from Audi through email from the branch manager in relation to the issue. The issue so far is the water still being present in the sills. Audi tried to fix the issue however the problem is still prevalent. Regards 
    • First begging letter received from Overdales   ;Blah blah blah, our client's are going to win this blah blah blah we supplied all your documents under CPR   PS you can stop all this by paying £1200 less in a lump sum
    • Right,  so the court hasn't send out the Directions Questionnaires/N180s yet. PE's one is a false one, meant to intimidate you into thinking your defence was rubbish and they are confident with their claim. This is par for the course.  The PPCs do this regularly. However, PE have gone further and written that "a copy has also been filed with the court" which is a lie as the court haven't even sent out the papers yet. Keep a screenshot of MCOL, later on in your WS you can draw attention to their lying and abuse of court procedure. If you've got time on your hands, then complain to the BPA about one of their members lying.    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

jilly vs halifax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6492 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

I sent off for my statements and this is the 1st letter i receive back so far.

hi

Just a up date ,I decided to go for the abbey and halifax.

 

My 1st letter back from the halifax :

 

my letter :

Completion of request for a list of transactions and charges

 

Thank you for your letter requesting specific information on your account with us.I can confirm the copies of duplicate statements have been ordered and will be sent under seperate cover.

 

With regard to your request for information relating to manual intervention o your account ,HBOS plc is under no statutory obligation to record this information and therfore,I am unable to assist further with your request.

yours faithfully

Nicola inett

data protection consultant

 

 

I dont understand the second part of the letter i used the template from here .

please can someone assist me.

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jilly,

This is just the standard reply from Halifax. Someone told me that the second bit means there has been no manual intervention on your account which is good

(correct me if that's not right, someone)

Just wait for your statement s and then proceed as per step by step instructions.

Good luck

Nona

[CENTER][SIZE=2][I][COLOR=DarkOrange]Any advice offered is only my opinion, based on my experience with my claim [/COLOR][/I][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][COLOR=Blue][SIZE=2] I won my case because[/SIZE] I READ THESE FIRST[/COLOR][/SIZE] [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/"][COLOR=red]http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/[/COLOR][/URL] [/CENTER] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=magenta][COLOR=Black][SIZE=3]Halifax[/SIZE][COLOR=YellowGreen]-[/COLOR][/COLOR][B][SIZE=4][COLOR=Red][COLOR=YellowGreen]SETTLED IN FULL[/COLOR] :D:D:D[/COLOR][/SIZE][/B][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=magenta] [COLOR=SeaGreen]Prelim letter sent [COLOR=Black]10/07/06[/COLOR] Moneyclaim issued [COLOR=Black]07//08/06[/COLOR][/COLOR] [COLOR=Red]Settled in full[/COLOR] [COLOR=Black]15/08/06 [SIZE=2] [/SIZE][/COLOR][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][CENTER][FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=magenta][COLOR=Black][SIZE=2][COLOR=DarkOrchid][SIZE=1]Survey completed. Donation made[/SIZE].[/COLOR][/SIZE][/COLOR][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [/CENTER] [CENTER][FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=2][COLOR=magenta][COLOR=Black][COLOR=Navy]Thanks to Dave and Bankfodder, and all who have given their time and advice[/COLOR]:)[/COLOR][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [/CENTER] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=red][COLOR=Black]Co-op Bank Visa[/COLOR] Settled after LBA (only £61 but hey ho, every penny counts) [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Comic Sans MS][SIZE=1][COLOR=#00bfff] [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just a update i have received some statements from halifax going back to the 14 sept 1995 until the 6 jan 2001 ,I have just realised these are only cardcash statements only.

I received these 1 week ago and i have had nothing since ,What shall i do??

thanks

Jill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought sprang to mind to me it looks like they have given me my 1st 6 years with halifax not last 6 years?

 

It is the last 6 years which they have to give me??

 

Shall i just wait until 40 days as passed which is on the 26/8/06 then send the non-compliance data protection act.??

 

please advise.thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can someone advise ,On what template i should send ,I have received some card staements 4 in total with hardly any transactions on these are dated 1995 -2001 ,It looks like they have sent my first 6 years not last 6 being 2000 - 2006 ,Do i send template 2 or template 3 ,The deadline is tomorrow !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's your choice, but the more peole that complain, the more likely they will get their act together in future.

 

The original statements they sent you, were they copies of statements or did they supply the info in another format? Also, when did the charges start?

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are card cash statements dating back to when i 1st opened the bank in 1995 upto 2000.I did not use the bank as my main bank then.

 

What i thought they would send would be 2001 - 2006 which is the last 6 years when i used the bank as my main banking and it would be when i incurred the charges.

 

I sent them template letter two for non-compliance but have not heard anything as yet but they have until Thursday 7th september to answer.

So shall i just wait and see.

thanks

jill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update

I received a letter today :

Dear sir/madam

Completition of request for a list of transactions and charges.......

 

Thank you for your letter requesting specific information on your account with us.I can confirm that copies of duplicate statements have been ordered and will be sent under seperate cover.

With regard to your request for information relating to manual interventions on your account HBOS is under no statutory obligation to record this information and therefore.I am unable to assist further with your account.

 

Should you have any general account queries ,please contact us.

 

N.J.Inett

 

This is the same letter i got at the 1st stage and nothing ever came then so what shall i do,.

 

I am right in thinking they have to send last 6 years statements (2000-2006),Which they have not...Please can someone help me into what i should do now!!!!!!!!!

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

See the templates library for letters re: DPA non-compliance. Choose the one that suits the current situation.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

Jonni2bad

I have already done the non-compliance i used template 2.The letter above is what they sent me on the 7 days notice form the non-compliance warning.The letter is the same as the 1st letter they sent when i done the data protection act but they still have not sent statemnets for the last six years.

 

If they dont come by the end of week should i phone them to see where they are and state dates i require???

regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

If, at the expiry of the timescale in your Non-Compliance letter, you've still not received them and they are now in excess of 40 days, start a court action to force them.

 

Just in case, before you do this, phone their legal team and let them know you will be starting court action - would they like to resolve the matter immediately? etc etc.

 

See contact details in this forum for the number (legal services)

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...