Team_Awesome Vs. Car Dealer***OVER AFTER LONG FIGHT*** or something to that effect

[MARTIN3030]

defendants name also should be removed-will do it now.

[MARTIN3030]

LP-

 

"The Claimant claims the sum of £3,010 with interest at 8% per annum from the date of purchase - 9th November 2008 - till the date of filing of this claim in the ... County Court of ... March 2009. This is the amount the Claimant paid to the Defendant for the vehicle."

 

 

This should read "Claimant seeks recovery of the initial purchase cost of £3010.00,plus section 69 interest at the courts discretion from 9th.November 2008 until judgement."

[MARTIN3030]

In your POCs of claim you state;

 

" This work included, but is not limited too:"

 

This looks a little open ended-in that if there WAS other work agreed then you would need to be clearer.

Should also read to not too .

[MARTIN3030]

Good-since this is a point that a Judge would pick up on.

[MARTIN3030]

Will leave LP to carry on assisting you-my posts werent meant to offend or overshadow...just observations.

[MARTIN3030]

I'm not sure if this is allowed according to CAG rules. In general PM advice is not allowed, though I believe sometimes the site team gives exceptions under certain circumstances. So as not to cause either of us trouble, and also to keep operating within CAG rules, as the help the CAG team give is so necessary, I have PM'd a member of the site team to ask if this is allowed under the circumstances. I'll let you know when I get the response, by editing this post.

 

The PoC will be - all being well - finished tonight and posted as an attachment.

 

Thanks for the click on my scales!

 

Sorry for the delay. Yesterday was the Jewish equivalent of April Fool's - or as close to it as possible - when it is customary to drink a lot, party and eat a great meal. So I drank quite a bit of whisky and beautiful dry red wine and got back about 8pm yesterday (after eating and drinking for over 2 hours), went straight to bed till about 1am, watched some news and then went back to bed till 9am. Also had to sleep a few hours during the day thanks to the almost 1 bottle of wine and probs half that in Glenfiddich 18, Dalwhinnie 15 & Balvenie 12 Double Wood! (In addition to steak, pickled brisket, roast chicken and lots more!)

 

Also only just replaced my temperamental keyboard & mouse.

 

 

 

 

 

Not sure who you sent the message to but no one has replied,so will just say a few words.

 

Exceptions can be where it is in the interest of hiding it from the defence,where its an ongoing matter which has already been sanctioned,or where its not practical nor feasible to post because of a file size.

 

 

In this instance it would seem that its just to determine one POC from another.

It would be a good learning experience IHHO if they were both posted here and that the shortcomings/choices between the 2 can be discussed.This way others can learn too.If the decision to choose between 2 is taken outside the thread,then no one will have the benefit of learning.

[MARTIN3030]

Excellent.

 

At 13 pages already this thread is going to be a VERY long one!

 

 

 

Your not kidding.....its ALREADY a very long one.I thought for a moment I was on the OFT test case thread.

[MARTIN3030]

LP have removed the identifiers of the named Judge.

Personally I would advise against posting such detail which include Court location/and date of time of hearing etc.

[MARTIN3030]

Its been relentless but LP has to be congratulated I think his input here has been amazing.

And of course it goes without saying.....we are all with fingers crossed.

[MARTIN3030]

Yes but you have asked the questions and done the guidance LP-Theres no way that the OP could have done any of this without you.

That was my point-I am sure that he will agree with that.

[MARTIN3030]

Lp we dont always see eye to eye,and on more than a few occs your patience has got in the way of constructive help,however its not always easy to admit wrongs and hold your hands up.

Your comments here are certainly welcome-I dont think anyone would deny this.

[MARTIN3030]

Just a note guys, but looking at these docs, all names, and reg no's are still pretty much visable..

 

least the 2 i've just had a glance at..

 

Can you tell me which ones JG ?

[MARTIN3030]

My pm is full and I have not yet organised saves.

If you can hit the red triangle ?

[MARTIN3030]

Ok 2 attatchments unapproved from first 5.

Team Awesome can re-upload once the personal info has been removed.

Thanks JG for bringing it to attention.

[MARTIN3030]

No problem.

[MARTIN3030]

Ok I have re-approved.