Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Debs store card - RECLAIM CHARGES??


JANRHYS
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5397 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Could I request some help please?

i have a Debs store card, which is about £2,000. I am currently paying between 50 -80 pounds a month, which is being eaten up in interest charges of approx £43!. i admit i have some late charges added, this because they have my payment date down as the 19th of the month and as i am monthly paid i'e told them on many occassions i cant make a payment until the end of the month but theysay they cant change the date , so come the 19th, they dont get thier money they add on a late charge an i pay at the end of the month and its still in arrears, i cant win.

 

Is there any scope for me to reclaim the charges back? if so do you have a template letter i can send to GE Money? i've had this card for years and havnt used it for about 2 yrs as the pyts never seem to go down, the charges are astronmical .

Any help will be really appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Late charges are unlawful penalties - claim them all back (don't be fobbed off with any difference between the charges paid and £12 either)

 

For help, have alook at my GE Money thread

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Many thanks fora reply, apologies for taking long to reply.

I read the info on GE Money, that was very helpful. Could you let me know what the initial letter was that you sent first of all to GE Money, and do i need to enclosed a postal order for a certain amount. I do hope they reply speedily to me also!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Just been talking to Debenhams, had the same answer. Wont change statement date so will always be in arrears. They told me if we could pay say an extra £10 per month our arrears will clear in 7 months!!! They also told me that they are only allowed to charge late payment fees twice so check your statement.

 

I too will be sending a SAR to them, have decided to reclaim all of the charges although I know it goes back onto your account, at least it will clear some of your balance.

 

HH

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are only deemed fair by the people charging them. They can only claim they are fair if they are prepared to let a court rule on the subject - the OFT have said that onbly a court can so rule. So far, all the banks, credit card companies, etc have been extremely reluctant to go to court.

 

A fair charge is limited to what it actuially costs them. For most 'breaches' it is a few pence at most, usually nothing. To go to court would mean revealing their costs - thay are not going to god that.

 

Long way of saying, claim it all back.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Many thanks for that.

GE Money are a nightmare.

Is there a template letter i can send to them located on this forum?

 

ps: HH - Keep on at them, i will keep my fingers crossed for you. I didnt know about only charging you twice for a late pyt. I've had so many charges applied i've lost count!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi,

 

I am having the same quandry. I have received a letter stating that the OFT has ruled that a £12 charge has been considered 'fair.'

 

The letter also states that should I want to pursue the complaint further I should contact the Financial Ombudsman.

 

Shall I now threaten to take them to the small claims court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I have said before, to say the OFT has ruled that a £12 charge is fair is a complete lie. The OFT have said that they will not take action below this level for the time being as an efficiency measure (for them)

 

FOS is a complete waste of space

 

Yes, take them to court

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Steven,

 

I thought it was probably a load of BS. I presume there is the necessary court action letter on here somewhere?

 

Thanks once again for your help. Educated criminals work within the law as a famous chap once said!

 

I will find the letter and threaten them with court action. I find the 'good will gesture' more of an insult.

 

I will also have a look at your other thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to be a pain. Does anyone have a link to the correct follow up letter to respond to the nonsense that they say about £12 being ruled as fair by the OFT. I assume it is a court action letter but cannot seem to find the right one on the site...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...