Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject.   My original  CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  So at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them.   Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.  
    • whats the court claimform for? return of goods order? please complete this:  
    • std DWF letter. typically £157 something. lots of them here already doesn't say WILL anything. read it properly dx  
    • Have you read our upload guide [click on the word] for advice on how to post up documents? Pdf files are best, jpegs won't be accepted. HB
    • Sunak's already had enough of travelling like the little people. Rishi Sunak flies back from Devon by helicopter after gushing about 'great' train travel - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Rishi Sunak told broadcasters: 'The train was great, I've been taking lots of pictures and videos' - but he skipped the 3-hour, £55 train home in favour of...  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

About Letter Before Action


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6420 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

Thought I had posted this,but here goes again.When sending the above letter

do I ask for the original amount which is over the £750 as I did in the first letter

or do I have to ask for the amount which I would be suing them for should my case come come to court?

 

Sorry if this has been answered before

best

Mike b

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mike

 

I have claimed the same amount as in my prelim letter, only when I go to the Sherriff Court am I breaking down my claim, in my case I am taking the returned charges separately from unauthorised overdraft charges .... this works quite well to keep it under £750 per claim.

 

HTH

 

T

I will not be held liable for any advice/comments given... if in any doubt please consult professional advice.

 

HBOS Acc1 - Small Claim Filed 31/07/06 - WON -21/8/06 - MCOL -06/09/06 - WON 13/09/06

 

HBOS acc2 -Small Claim Filed 02/08/06 - WON 13/09/06 - Round 2 Prelim Letter sent 14/09.06 - LBA sent 27/09/06 - MCOL 16/10/06

 

HBOS acc3 Prelim Letter sent 14/09/06 - LBA sent 27/09/06 - MCOL 16/10/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mike

 

I have claimed the same amount as in my prelim letter, only when I go to the Sherriff Court am I breaking down my claim,

T

 

ditto, only I am doing mine by date.

Bank of Scotland round 1: £740 + costs settled, still sore over the 8% grrr

Bank of Scotland round 2: £629 +101.15 interest +£39 costs settled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same as above - remember to claim the earliest ones first though, just in case any of them are close to the 5 year deadline (you'd be suprised how many don't think of this, including... who.!? Me.!? :rolleyes: )

** I AM NOT A LAWYER, PLEASE CONSULT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IF YOU ARE IN ANY DOUBT **

 

I have successfully claimed against: "MBNA, Capital One, Bank of Scotland & Clydesdale Bank"

 

The Consumer Action Group is a Self-Help website, Moderators & Site Helpers offer advice on a voluntary basis. Please spend time reading the FAQ's, and other cases relating to your bank before starting your own claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

What's the significance of keeping the claim under £750??

 

Also, can we only claim for the last 5 years in Scotland?

 

Sorry, just discovered the site and going a bit google-eyed reading all the posts!!

RBoS Round One:

Subject Access Request sent 02.10.06

Prelim Approach For Repayment sent 23.10.06

LBA for £620 (round 1) sent 30.10.06

Partial Settlement Offer £374.00 received 4.11.06

Rejection of Settlement sent 6.11.06

Full Settlement of £620 offered 15.11.06

Ready for Round Two......................

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can only claim last 5 years in Scotland

and only claim £750 max in one go-if your claim is more than 750 wait till

you get paid and reclaim on the rest-making sure you don`t go over the 750

mark at any given time. this is to include your intrest at 8% for each period

and your court fee of £39 and your £10 for your back bank statements.

 

Mikeb

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for getting back to me Mike. I'm glad I waited for a reply. I'm about to claim £900+ from RBoS! 2 stages it is then!!

RBoS Round One:

Subject Access Request sent 02.10.06

Prelim Approach For Repayment sent 23.10.06

LBA for £620 (round 1) sent 30.10.06

Partial Settlement Offer £374.00 received 4.11.06

Rejection of Settlement sent 6.11.06

Full Settlement of £620 offered 15.11.06

Ready for Round Two......................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suze.

 

You can still claim in one go, its just that you have to use the "summary cause" route as opposed to the small claims one.

 

There is very little difference in the procedure - ALTHOUGH - If you end up losing in court, the judge "might" get you to pay for the banks legal costs. That said, absolutely noone has had to defend in court, so it is highly unlikely to get that far.

 

I am going down the summary cause route, and so have loads of others.

 

Hope this helps.

 

J:D

  • Confused 1

1/9/06 RBS claim #1

8/11/06 - claim settled

17/11 claim #2 started - incl creditcard

30/11 - CC statements received

31/11 - Prelims issued - RBS paying up, only M/C to go)

 

If any of my advice/ info has been helpful, please click the scales:D

 

Please also remember that any advice is given from my own experience and in good faith as a lay person. If in doubt, please contact a qualified professional:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi SUZ

Your wrong about no one having to go to court (WAJ) there is people from this site had to already go to court.Think you`l be better off Suz doing what I said.

One person I can remember from this site had the adjorned and told they had better prove to the court at the next hearing that the banks were taking money that was ilegal.Cant remember the post though but its happend alright.

 

mikeb

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...