Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Natwest CCJ.. Can it be overturned?


GhostDebt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5510 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Afternoon everyone.

 

Before discovering this wonderful site, we got CCJ'd by Natwest.

I am going to chase them for account charges and interest as best as possible, but is it still worth sending a CCA request regarding the loan account incorporated into the CCJ. If they fail to comply with the CCA request, can this be used as a reason to get the CCJ overturned or reduced in some way.

 

One other questions.

Because the overdraft was in joint names, they obtained a CCJ in both my name and seperately in my wifes name. (Loan account was incorporated into my CCJ because it was in my name only.)

On paper it now looks like we have to pay back twice for the overdraft. Is this the case? or are they tied up in some way?

 

Many thanks for your help.

Regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to chase them for account charges and interest as best as possible, but is it still worth sending a CCA request regarding the loan account incorporated into the CCJ. If they fail to comply with the CCA request, can this be used as a reason to get the CCJ overturned or reduced in some way.

Hi, you can't CCA for the overdraft accounts. But you can have a go for the Loan account. However, when we did ours on the RBS, they refused to comply because the Judgement becomes your agreement.

It will really depend on how old the CCJ's are.

 

Best thing to do. Do a SAR for all the accounts. Calculate exactly all the charges & interest. Put in your claim.

Also, you will be able to see if they are continuing to add interest Post Judgement. If they are, they will have to provide the agreements to prove they can do this. They cannot add interest on OD accounts.

 

Because the overdraft was in joint names, they obtained a CCJ in both my name and seperately in my wifes name. (Loan account was incorporated into my CCJ because it was in my name only.)

On paper it now looks like we have to pay back twice for the overdraft. Is this the case? or are they tied up in some way?

 

The RBS have done exactly the same to us, 2 CCJ's for the same debt. Different case numbers. Nowhere on the paperwork does it state that they are joined.They will not chase you for double the debt, but as a couple, it looks on your credit file as 2 seperate debts, doubled.

However you could write to the Complaints Department at CMS Telford & demand clarification.

 

 

I will keep you updated if you want. This is only one part of our case against the RBS. But we have a Solicitor who is looking at whether they can do this.

 

Debs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Debs, hope things are proceeding ok for you at the moment.

 

Please have a look at Enrons comment on this thread

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/136720-c-c-turned-up-6.html#post1991129

You may find it useful, regarding your CCJ enforceability query.

 

If you get any feedback on this from your solicitor, I would love to hear it.

 

Best regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too have a ccj from Nastywest for a loan - I CCA'd them and they replied that the CCJ replaced the Consumer Credit Act so they did not have to supply my agreement - I replied that the CCJ is an instrument of collection of the debt and if the agreement is not produced it is unenforceable and an application could be made to overturn the CCJ on that basis - am I correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too have a ccj from Nastywest for a loan - I CCA'd them and they replied that the CCJ replaced the Consumer Credit Act so they did not have to supply my agreement - I replied that the CCJ is an instrument of collection of the debt and if the agreement is not produced it is unenforceable and an application could be made to overturn the CCJ on that basis - am I correct?

 

We need someone with experience to assist us here please. I have CCJ's with Egg Card & Egg Loan, I've asked for a variance as due to change of circumstances I am unable to afford the original CCJs, I've just had the variations back, and guess what, they've only INCREASED the payment.

 

It now appears that there are several of us in this situation and there must be someway round the fact that CCJ's have been obtained on unenforceable agreements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please note, according to the one of the regulatory bodies.

If an agreement is unenforceable, it cannot be enforced even with a court order. - See Enrons thread posted at #5 for further info.

I think this could be used to help overturn the CCJ, but if they won't provide an agreement for you to check, you will have to do a SAR to them to get it and if they still refuse to provide it, start a court action against them to get it.

 

If anyone else has any further comments, please offer as your assistance is greatly appreciated.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...