Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5605 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, my mother has been having some money issues recently and over the last couple of years has fallen behind on her council tax. Last year we kind of panicked when the Bailiffs (Bristow & Sutor) were sent in and even though we turned them away once we eventually allowed them in and they filled in a wpa and agreed a monthly repayment of £150 (debt was about £800). We paid them by cheque for the first couple of months with no issue, however, one month they didn't cash our cheque (we didn't notice this at the time) until 5 weeks after we sent it at which point they cashed that cheque and the following months cheque simultaneously which lead to one bouncing. They sent my mother a very snooty letter saying it was not their policy to deal with bouncing cheques and she had 72 hours to pay the full balance or they were coming to get her stuff. At this point i knew i'd made a mistake letting them in so i just paid the full balance to them immediately from my account. Completely settling the debt.

 

Fast forward 9 months and they're after us again for £450 which my mother has missed from this years council tax. this time i have flat out refused to let them in and i am a bit unsure whether to send them a letter saying i will send you £75 a month to clear the debt but you will gain no access to the property and this is my final offer + if you send a bailiff around to the property again I will refuse to deal with you and make payments directly to the council only. Or, whether i should try and get the council to take back the debt immediately? If so would the council stop the bailiffs calling round?

 

They came round last night with a notice of intended seizure of your goods, which didn't list the costs or debt but merely said we can call early morning or late evening, goods can be removed in your absence and costs will be substantial. i told them my mother wasn't in and closed the door. they've come round again today while no one was in and left a final notice saying that if we don't pay goods will be seized and costs for that could be over £250. non of the letters i've had so far have detailed a visit fee.

 

So the gist of my questions are;

i haven't let them in this time and the previous wpa was completely settled before this one came into effect, could they force entry?

 

they've called 4 times now, the first 2 times 3 weeks apart then yesterday and today, they can only charge for the first 2 visits yeah? is it usual for them to call every day or 2 or 3 times in one day?

 

should i attempt to deal with them, while still denying them access, or go to the council. if the council could i get them to call the bailiffs off.

 

the bailiffs have attempted to call my mother at work, could they attempt to go into work to see her?

 

my mother doesn't drive but if she has a visitors car on the drive and they come to call could that car be clamped?

 

*they would be perfectly within their rights to try and get in at 2am or anything if i understand correctly?

 

thanks for any help :)

Edited by DH84
Link to post
Share on other sites

don't let them in this time just because you let them in the last time does not give them the right to come in. This is a new demand so they must start all over again they can only charge for 2 letters and i dint think they should be phoning your mothers work

chris600uk has helped me with bailiffs and I'm sure when he comes on will help you also

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fast forward 9 months and they're after us again for £450 which my mother has missed from this years council tax. this time i have flat out refused to let them in and i am a bit unsure whether to send them a letter saying i will send you £75 a month to clear the debt but you will gain no access to the property and this is my final offer + if you send a bailiff around to the property again I will refuse to deal with you and make payments directly to the council only. Or, whether i should try and get the council to take back the debt immediately? If so would the council stop the bailiffs calling round?

 

First, well done for keeping them out this time.

 

I suggest that you send them a template letter warning them that you are under no obligation to deal with them. There's no need to say anymore.

 

Then I would start paying the council direct online, that way the debt will be paid off within 6 months

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks, i'll get the template sent off recorded delivery and deal direct with the council from this point on. do you know about the other points though? are they likely to keep calling?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They came round last night with a notice of intended seizure of your goods, which didn't list the costs or debt but merely said we can call early morning or late evening, goods can be removed in your absence and costs will be substantial. i told them my mother wasn't in and closed the door.

 

Right thing to do, they'll get the message eventually, incidentally I wouldn't tell them you are paying the council, that's none of their business.

 

 

they've come round again today while no one was in and left a final notice saying that if we don't pay goods will be seized and costs for that could be over £250. non of the letters i've had so far have detailed a visit fee.

 

Don't worry they'll get to that, but you must reply to each letter now separately, pointing out how incorrect they are.

 

 

So the gist of my questions are;

i haven't let them in this time and the previous wpa was completely settled before this one came into effect, could they force entry?

 

 

No they can't, when you paid off the last debt that satisfied the liability order they were granted then.

 

 

they've called 4 times now, the first 2 times 3 weeks apart then yesterday and today, they can only charge for the first 2 visits yeah? is it usual for them to call every day or 2 or 3 times in one day?

 

Maybe they were just in the area, but it's not that unusual and of course you've got some history with the firm, so they might think you're a soft touch cos you let them in last time.

They'll take a bit of convincing this time - but you can do it.

 

 

should i attempt to deal with them, while still denying them access, or go to the council. if the council could i get them to call the bailiffs off.

 

Frankly no - I would treat them as if they were invisible - write to their office, and pay the council direct.

If you do that, at some point they will hand the account back to the council anyway.

 

 

the bailiffs have attempted to call my mother at work, could they attempt to go into work to see her?

 

I believe that is harrassment, and you should make a separate complaint about that.

They have no right to do that.

 

 

 

 

my mother doesn't drive but if she has a visitors car on the drive and they come to call could that car be clamped?

 

No, they might levy upon it, but the levy would be unlawful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

*they would be perfectly within their rights to try and get in at 2am or anything if i understand correctly?

 

No, they are entitled to gain peaceful entry, where you invite them in, or leave a door or window (upstairs or downstairs) open as if inviting them in.

 

To do it at 2am, would risk being treated with extreme prejudice.

 

Keep all doors and windows closed, and park any cars away from the house

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry hope you dont mind me butting in on this post. I am in a similar situation and am determined I am not letting Ross & Roberts through the door this time!

You mention a template letter - where can I find that?

 

Many thanks

Won £3800 from Lloyds!

Issued one letter

Issued court proceedings

Defence entered by Lloyds

Entered my Allocation Questionnaire

Unless Order from District Judge

Lloyds failed to comply

Entered Request for Judgment

Judgment Entered

2 days later money in bank!!!

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...