Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Charges whilst on benefits


***inca***
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5424 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thought I would post about this as it brought a smile to my face yesterday morning.

 

HSBC wrote to me telling me they were going to be slapping onto my account a £25.00 charge for the reversal of a cheque as it would have taken me £30.00 overdrawn.

 

At the moment I am on JSA and that £25.00 is a massive amount to me, especially with it being Christmas and all.

 

I thought that I had nothing to lose by sending them the 'charges whilst on benefits' letter (although I did make a few changes, as there's a few spelling mistakes in it etc) and sent it off recorded right away.

 

I heard nothing from them... not a dicky bird!

 

Money was due to come out yesterday morning, I rang up and they haven't taken it!

 

HSBC 0 - Inca 1

 

If you are on benefits and they do slap a charge on, please send that letter!!!

 

:D:D:D

  • Haha 1

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Inca, congratulations on your victory and thank you for posting your result :D.

 

It just shows with the right knowledge even the little man / lady in the street can make these big organisations listen.

 

I'm sure you will be an inspiration to others in the comming months.

 

Pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

There have been several reported cases of Banks taking charges from accounts that have benefits paid into them by DWP and Social security.thus leaving them with little or no money.

Here is a template letter to take or send to the bank to address this.

It is important to let the bank have this BEFORE you expect to have funds paid in by DWP or the Inland revenue.

A new letter should be sent for each payment that you expect to be protected,customise as required by adding the benefit/type of payment.

 

 

 

 

RIGHT OF APPROPRIATION

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx

 

I am writing to inform you that I am due to have a Tax Credit payment of £xxx paid into my account on xx/xx/xx, and I wish to use my first right of appropriation for this money, for the following purposes;

Rent £xx

Utilities bills £xx

Housekeeping money £xx

I will withdraw the money on the day that it is deposited for the above use, and I would be grateful if you would ensure that any other payments out of my account do not interfere with this withdrawal.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

[signature]

 

[print name)

rockin all over the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's not the letter I sent. Will post mine here in a second.

 

I didn't tell them what I use my money for, they have no right to know that.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

Unpaid Item Charge Account Number: (enter this line as appropriate)

I am in receipt of your letter stating that you are to apply charges of £25.00 to my account on 19th December 2008 due to the reversal of a cheque.

 

The social security act1992 states that banks may not take charges from any benefits that a person needs to live on. I have been in receipt of Job Seekers Allowance since October 2008. Job Seekers Allowance is a basic living allowance.

Therefore I am asking you to please remove the impending charge on my account.

I reserve the right to commence further my grievance to the financial ombudsmen service without any further notice should you fail to comply.

 

 

Yours faithfully

Never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you on experience ;)

 

Inca V Crapital One: Low monthly payments accepted - Paid

Inca V HSBC (Charges): WON - Charge reversed.

Inca V Barclaycard/CSL: Complaint sent after CSL illegally took money from my account. Dispute ready to send: Not heard anything since March 2009! Jan 2011 Rc'd letter from new debt collectors saying they have bought the debt. Joy!

Inca's Nan V Saga Card: Utter *****!! Low payments eventually accepted

Inca's Nan V MBNA: Low payments accepted

Inca's sister V Moorcroft: WON. Low payments accepted.

Inca's sister V Thames Credit: Nothing received. Dispute sent 08/01/09: Not heard a dicky bird since March 2009!

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

inca I was only posting a copy of a letter Martin had done, magnum was looking for a template, that was all I could find.....

 

I did not say he had to tell them, I was just posting a copy of the letter in the hope he andothers might A find it helpfull and B given them some idea of what to say..

rockin all over the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi hope you don't mind me commenting but, what gets me is the banks don't tell you about right of approppriation. Surely they should be providing this sort of information making it easily accessible for everybody. Yes I know this sounds naive. However especially for disabled people like myself surely they have a duty to make it easy for us to use this service? Otherwise aren't they breaking the law?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi t and a

 

At one time I would have said that this was a naive conception. However, in the light of the new FSA guidelines on treating customers fairly, I would say that the banks should be giving this information as a matter of course before making arbitrary deductions from accounts ........

 

Treating customers fairly

 

IMHO, when an intention to recover charges is notified , as it should be, that notification should include advice on how a debtor can object to these charges being made .........

 

Then again , maybe I'm becoming naive .........:eek::)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Jonny.

 

No I don't think so, I think, certainly in my case (and quite a few others on this site) they are in breach of the services part of the disabled discrimination act. Problem is I'm too poorly to chase it up at the moment. I suspect they should also be helping us to set up right of appropriation and provide us help when we are making a complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi, I had a few bank charges a couple of years ago when I was in receipt of JSA. I am also currently claiming JSA. I sent the letter to the bank stating that it was illegal for them to take these charges whilst on benefits.

I recieved a letter from the bank today saying that as I was charged fee's and not charges it doesn't apply to the social security act.

Does anyone have any advice on what I should do?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi becci -c welcome to the forum :)

 

First of all , could I ask you to open your own thread on this (using the 'NEW THREAD ' button at the top or bottom left of the main page of the HSBC forum and copy and paste your query into it .. that way you'll get advice specific to you .... not mixed up with anyone else's .

 

However my first reaction would be to tell you to get your JSA paid into another account completely unconnected with HSBC so they can't plunder it at their leisure ........

 

That should give you breathing space to work out how much they've had off you in their so -called 'fees' and set about claiming some back ..

 

I'll keep an eye out for your thread ,but you'll alweays get an answer from someone on here - not necessarily me ..... :) so don't give up ..... you'll get plenty of help :D

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...