Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

What can happen?


yflad
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5664 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I am new here and wanted to write for advice as I am extremely worried about my debts.

 

I owe Natwest £10k on a loan, plus £2.5k on a credit card and another £2k on an overdraft. I had a business 2 years ago, but I lost all my work because I became ill (was diagnosed with schizophrenia).

 

Am now on benefits and living elsewhere, but still gets phone calls by the DCAs. The bank don't know my address and the DCAs only phone through my mobile.

 

I don't quite know what to do. I have payment protection on my loan if I was ill, but because of the nature of my illness, I stopped communicating with them when I moved house.

 

What should I do?

 

Can I be forced into bankruptcy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thank you for your response.

 

All the debts are about 2 years old, and they are all personal debts, not attached to my business.

 

I took them all out between October 2005 and March 2006, but I lost my entire business overnight (I simply got up one day and could not work).

 

Of course I want to do something about my loans, but the medication for schizophrenia leaves me very tired and I cannot think properly half the time. My only source of income now is Housing Benefit and Incapacity Benefit, and it's certainly just enough to live on and will not clear these loans.

 

Various debt collections have been pursuing me but by telephone only as they do not know my new address and I don't want to tell them it.

 

I feel extremely unwell most of the time due to my illness, but I have been getting the most awful phone calls from a company called Allied International in Glasgow.

 

If I was well enough, I could probably accept what they are saying, but their phone calls just fill me with horror. Most of the other debt collection agencies are courteous and reasonably nice, but these people have to be the most horrid people I have ever spoken to. Their staff don't seem to want to help me with my debt, but simply want to rub my nose in it. Most of their phone calls start along the lines "So Mr XXXX, are you going to try and evade me today. It's very clear that you can hear me, even though you keep saying the line is bad and you can't hear me." (my mobilephone signal in my house is genuinely quite poor and I have difficulty accepting calls)

 

Every single time this person phones, his manner is very abrupt and aggressive and he says all these things that aren't even relevant. My friend answered my phone the other day, and he started shouting at him down the phone "what right do you have to answer Mr XXXX's phone?"

 

Allied International have threatened me with enforced bankruptcy. I don't really understand this and how it can be done.

 

I think if I was well, I could live with being contacted by this agency, but because I am not well, I am finding it very difficult to pull myself together.

 

I don't know what to do and can't see any solution.

 

Does anyone please have any ideas about whether I can be forced into bankruptcy, or what possible options I have given everything I have said here?

 

I don't want to hide away from my debts, but I genuinely feel so ill because of my health problems.

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest I think you would get more help if you moved your thread to the Debt Industry forum rather than on the general.

 

Also, I know its not what you want to hear but hiding away is not going to help. I'm sure that there is something about when someone is ill and/ or on benefit you can get help with agreeing payments. I myself am on benefits and the hardest thing was agreeing a low payment. One company refused and I felt forced to pay more than I could afford but that was before I came across this site. Now I feel I have the power rather than them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Yflad

I am sorry to hear about your troubles, you don't needs this given you are not well and it will not help your rebuild your life. The good news is that you have come to the right place for advice.

 

My suggestion would be for you to request the agreements for the loan and credit card and post them here with the personal details removed, we will then be able to see if they are enforceable. You should read around the many other threads, use the search facility.

 

It is not in their interest to make you bankrupt since they would get zilch, they are trying to frighten you.

 

What are the charges that have been made against the loan, card and overdraft, you will be able to claim these back which will help reduce the amount. You will need to do a Subject Access Request to get all the information and this letter is in the template section.

 

Don't let them get to you, their objective is to intimidate, bully and humiliate you. If possible either bar their calls or get a new mobile number as I did years ago. The alternative is to write to them requesting that all contact is in writing ONLY. Again, you need to read around and see the process others have followed. We have all been hounded by these people and most of us came from the same position as you, not knowing what our legal rights were and feeling as low as possible. Believe me, you will feel a lot better when you have read some of the threads on CAG and seen what can be done.

 

Good luck and hope you are feeling better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a letter in the templates you can send to Allied International - telling them not to call - when they do just tell them "Do not call" over and over again.

 

You could also read Mr Ton's excellent thread "Cheekiness towards a DCA" and get some ideas on how to confuse them - it really is quite satisfying when they end the call in frustration rather than the other way round.

 

As your income is all benefits there are other letters you can use to get these people off your backs, more people will be along with help and advice soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...