Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Patel vs First Direct


vpatel27
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6452 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

I am sending off the data request letter today as i have about 1.5 years of statements missing.

 

I was going through the statements I do have and First Direct make it very easy to work out the overdraft fees as they provide a breakdown on seperate sheets.

What I am confused about is that they have 2 different fees.

1. Overdraft Fee

2. Excess Overdraft Fee

 

Do I include both of these in my calculations?

 

Also the interest shown on these sheets, is that the interest I can claim back too?

 

If this is the case, with the statements I have at home it already amounts too £1600!

 

Sorry if this is detailed somewhere else, but I have a good read through and cant find the answer, website is massive now and its hard to find specific information.

 

Thank you

Egg - WAR!

Natwest - WAR!

First Direct - Got my money back - £ 3249.71

:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I have claimed the overdraft fee and the excess overdraft fee.

There is something elsewhere on this site about interest - I think if the unfair charges resulted in interest being charged then you can claim that back but not the interest you would be paying on your overdraft otherwise.

However, if you get to the moneyclaim/court stage you add interest at 8% but only at that stage (when you also add the legal costs).

 

Sorry I cant be more specific - as I say it is in here somewhere - but how you find it without reading for a week I dont know!!;)

:) Susie-que :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can work out the interest on the fees that were over your overdraft. However to be honest it is such a small amount and relatively difficult to calculate. I left it off of mine. I would have hated to get it wrong them give them a nice defence. I my letter requesting payment I did tell them I had left it off at this stage but if they didn't pay up then I reserved the right to add it later.

Egg Data Protection Act Statements arrived. On hold.

 

Halifax - Moneyclaim £3100

 

Amex to Remove Default - acknowledged didn't issue correct documents - default removed :) . £135 paid in full without Court

 

I'm on a roll now :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

An overdraft fee (£30) is when the agreed overdraft is first exceeded or charged when the account is still over the agreed limit going into a new statement period.

 

The excess overdraft fee (£25) is when after first exceeding (already £30 charge) in any statement period they balance increases further into debit.

 

ie - £30 first charge for going over the limit and £25 per day that balance increase further (not per day and not per item)

 

RESULT - both of which should be claimed back

 

HTH

Link to post
Share on other sites

An overdraft fee (£30) is when the agreed overdraft is first exceeded or charged when the account is still over the agreed limit going into a new statement period.

 

The excess overdraft fee (£25) is when after first exceeding (already £30 charge) in any statement period they balance increases further into debit.

 

ie - £30 first charge for going over the limit and £25 per day that balance increase further (not per day and not per item)

 

RESULT - both of which should be claimed back

 

HTH

 

Wow, really, That's cool. I was thinking I had forgotten I paid £30 per month for the overdraft facility - wondered why it didn't appear on all the statemnts. Sorry to butt in on the thread, but this will add more onto my claim. I was worried anyway, because I hadn't sent my prelim letter recorded delivery. So I will send it again with the revised charges - can't wait to get home and add it up now... might even add the interest!!!

Cahoot

JBD issued - 27/07/06, warrant issued 08/08/06

First Direct

Settled in Full

Capital One

Prelim Sent

Citi Financial

Offer of difference betwen £30 and £12

GE Capital - Evans Card, Data Protection Act

Argos Card, DPA

Barclay Card, 8th May-DPA, 14th July- 2nd DPA (asking complete history!!)

Egg Card & Egg Loan,DPA

NatWest Card

LBA

Vodfone

3rd letter re: default

Studio & Ace

Prelim for Studio e-mailed

 

Contents of my posts are purely my own personal opinions, some formed by personal experience and some from research. If in doubt seek qualified legal advice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent letter requesting my data on 14/07/2006

Got a reply today saying they will send all information by courier, they sent my cheques back too so will supply information for free (bonus!).:)

Egg - WAR!

Natwest - WAR!

First Direct - Got my money back - £ 3249.71

:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Guys

 

I recieved my statements by courier as stated in the letter from First Direct.

 

Just want to make sure that the charges I add in my total are definetly the ones I can claim for.

I have added the following together

 

Overdraft charges

Excess Overdraft Charges

Recall charges (so/dd)

Unpaid Cheque charge - for which they charged me £80!!!!!

 

Can someone please confirm that all these charges are claimable. Thank you very much :)

Egg - WAR!

Natwest - WAR!

First Direct - Got my money back - £ 3249.71

:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

The same as I claimed! yes go for it with those.

Egg Data Protection Act Statements arrived. On hold.

 

Halifax - Moneyclaim £3100

 

Amex to Remove Default - acknowledged didn't issue correct documents - default removed :) . £135 paid in full without Court

 

I'm on a roll now :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a reply from FD, the usual BLAH BLAH about reading T&Cs when opened account.

If I want to escalate my concerns then I need to write to

Robert Kernaghan

Customer Relations Manager

 

So will be sending LBA today!

 

LloydsTSB ****ed me off today to my cashing my £10 chq for £1000 leaving me pennyless. So perfect day to write ****y letter to banks.

Egg - WAR!

Natwest - WAR!

First Direct - Got my money back - £ 3249.71

:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't bother - If they want to esculate it, it is for them. I wrote back and told them thank you for blah blah and suggested it was for them to worry about how they dealt internally with the matter and I would be issuing claim in X days. Strangely I got a standard letter from RK two days later but it is a waste of paper anyway as it was exactly the same standard letter as before.

Egg Data Protection Act Statements arrived. On hold.

 

Halifax - Moneyclaim £3100

 

Amex to Remove Default - acknowledged didn't issue correct documents - default removed :) . £135 paid in full without Court

 

I'm on a roll now :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for my language in previous reply! Was a bit angry all in all with being taken for a mug.

 

Well letter is all typed and sealed so will send anyway. Will let you guys know the response and then will probably need help in filling in the court form.

 

God knows i could do with the money right now

Egg - WAR!

Natwest - WAR!

First Direct - Got my money back - £ 3249.71

:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Got my 2nd letter telling me that they have done nothing wrong, so off to court i go! Will message back in need of help i think, will need it for filling in the court form.

Egg - WAR!

Natwest - WAR!

First Direct - Got my money back - £ 3249.71

:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok can someone please help me with filling in this form. What do I put in Brief Details of Claim??

In the Particluars of the claim, do i just attach the spreadsheet to this as the details??

Thank you soo much

Egg - WAR!

Natwest - WAR!

First Direct - Got my money back - £ 3249.71

:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hello Everyone

 

Sorry haven't been around for a while, was waiting on some money so i could afford to put the claim into court. Now have the money so will be putting claim in today. Im a bit nervous about it all. Keep thinking I am going to write down something wrong and then the whole will blow up in my face.

 

Fingers crossed

Egg - WAR!

Natwest - WAR!

First Direct - Got my money back - £ 3249.71

:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok need some urgent help on Moneyclaim form...

Do i tick these 2 questions??

 

Does or will your claim include any issues under the Human Rights Act 1998?

 

Do you want to reserve the right to claim interest?

:confused:

Egg - WAR!

Natwest - WAR!

First Direct - Got my money back - £ 3249.71

:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I figured it out anyway, as i said i was unsure about doing one thing wrong.

Claim completed now, so i guess its a waiting game now. Are there any time limits i should be aware of?

Egg - WAR!

Natwest - WAR!

First Direct - Got my money back - £ 3249.71

:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok had bit of a panic attack yesterday as I remembered that I forgot to put my account number on the claim and also I didnt get an option on MCOL to attach my spreadsheet. I used the online chat and got advised to fax the court so I did that.

ANyway I also received a letter from DG Solicitors after they acknowledged my claim. They have offered £1624.86 in settlement, which I know not to accept as I am claiming £3246.71.

What they also said was that this settlement would go towards reduction of my outstanding debt which is with Metropolitan Collection Service. I don't want it to go there, I want a cheque to me. Can they inforce the money to pay off the debt??

Egg - WAR!

Natwest - WAR!

First Direct - Got my money back - £ 3249.71

:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooo My other question was, when i send the letter to refuse the part settlement, do I need to inform the courts of this too?

Egg - WAR!

Natwest - WAR!

First Direct - Got my money back - £ 3249.71

:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

:-| Hi Guys

 

After the first letter of settlement from FD offering me half the money, I wrote back to them saying that I would accept half but persue the rest, and that i would only acknowldge any payment if it was made by cheque to me (they were offerign to put it towards clearing my debt).

 

Got 2nd letter of settlement from FD offering me the full amount. But they have cheekly said that if i accept they will credit my account. I don't have an account with them anymore!!!

 

So just need some quick advise on my response. I have put so far the following:

 

I respectfully accept your offer of settlement of £3249.71 on the condition that the payment is made to myself via cheque

I will accept the sum offered as full settlement and on the clear understanding that full amount is paid via a cheque made out to Vaishali Patel otherwise I will pursue recovery with the County Court claim as issued.

 

I will not acknowledge any payment unless is made as stated via a cheque.

I trust this clarifies my position.

Is this ok??

Thank you

 

 

 

Egg - WAR!

Natwest - WAR!

First Direct - Got my money back - £ 3249.71

:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what anyone else thinks, the original sounded a littel confrontational so i have taken a bit of the sting out of it?

The thing to remember you want your claim to be dealt with quickly and reasonably, no matter what you actually think of the bank, real people have to read these letters and make decisions based on what you write, be nice and polite but firm, it pays dividends at the end of the day.

This of course is only my personal opinion, you are free to deal with this in any manner you choose.

 

I respectfully accept your offer of settlement of £3249.71 on the condition that the payment is made via cheque made payable to Vaishali Patel otherwise I will continue with the County Court claim as issued.

 

I will not acknowledge any payment unless is made as stated via a cheque.

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

 

I love the smell of banks coughing up refunds early in the morning

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply. i was thinking back to the LBA letter i sent at the begining of all this. FD have put a default on my credit rating, so I can also put a condition on that being removed has anyone been successful in doing that?

Also how do i refuse the confidentiality agreement?

Egg - WAR!

Natwest - WAR!

First Direct - Got my money back - £ 3249.71

:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply. i was thinking back to the LBA letter i sent at the begining of all this. FD have put a default on my credit rating, so I can also put a condition on that being removed has anyone been successful in doing that?

Also how do i refuse the confidentiality agreement?

Egg - WAR!

Natwest - WAR!

First Direct - Got my money back - £ 3249.71

:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can either rewrite a letter based on thiers and leave out that clause, or just put a line through the clause and initial it, this seems to be what everyone else is doing.

I love the smell of banks coughing up refunds early in the morning

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...