Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 4.  Under The Pre-Action Protocol 201?, a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior too and including ,The Pre action Protocol Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claimform dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 9.   The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2nd February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. re: 13 & 15...they dont need to produce the deed, thats a private b2b document only the judge can demand sight of. i would remove 13 totally as within their WS they have produced the Notice Of Assignment. and delete it from 15 a few ideas. dx  
    • Underp04 (I think it was him) put up the statement IDR used in court from some supposed expert mr edge. can you find it? It stated 10 years was the statute barred limit but also that the laws were very confusing. very much worth digging out!
    • You'll be fine don't worry.  
    • Thank you I cannot sleep. CRS is the company 
    • They wont take you to court. I'm not sure what they'll do about the letters and if they will or wont send you the letters from their retail prevention company, but you can ignore those letters. You'll be just fine don't worry.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Freedom of information act and NHS staff records


alexb123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5594 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In this case it sounds as if there are issues with those responsible for recruitment and supervision.

I think you are jumping to some hefty conclusions, based on one persons opinion of a single practitioner, especially as this is a newly qualified person who perhaps required more experience.

 

You have absolutely no idea why the other people left the service, it could have been totally coincidental.

 

I agree that if the patient is concerned regarding the treatment she received she has a right to complain and I would initially talk to the PALS service at the hospital and if you dont get a satisfactory response then escalate it as described.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have absolutely no problem with people making valid complaints regarding care they have (or have not) received, I have myself assisted people to do just that.

Complaints are vital to ensure that standards of care are maintained and improved in a health service that is profoundly failing those it was created to serve.

I worked in the health service for many years and I agree that PALS are a complete waste of time, but it is the first line of any complaint and therefore you have to start there.

Its interesting you feel that there is a circle the wagons culture as from the other side it felt quite the reverse, in fact I had to strenuously defend a member of my staff (I was a ward manager) regarding a complaint that was completely unfounded, but the PALS service had issued a full apology for, leading the complainant to publish the story in the local press. I was incensed.

There are deep seated problems in the health service - and from a clinical point of view - far too much money spent on "PR and image" and far too little spent on clinical care. And a percentage of the money allocated to clinical care is wasted through stupid segregationalist budgeting along with other practices which I will not go into as I have no desire to be sued for libel.

While I have no love of the "Machine" that is the NHS I still have a great affection for the staff who do a very difficult job for an increasingly demanding and ungrateful population.

Nurses in casualty are more likely to get assaulted than police officers in the course of their duty.

you save someones life and instead of thanking you - you get sued because in the melee of their emergency, somone mislaid their pyjama top!

I have no illusions that there are some staff, who need to be challenged in their behaviour (whatever their role) but also consider that this clinician who is listed in this post may well have been newly qualified, and forced into a situation for which they had neither the training or experience, with inadequate resources or supervision.

Complain Please - get the situation changed, but complain objectively, cite your reasons for complaint, your concerns regarding the specific clinician. If you get nothing more than a soothing letter (standard first response) then take it higher - see NHS complaints procedure : Department of Health - Managing your organisation

dont make it a personal attack on the individual - make it a complaint about the standards of care supplied by the NHS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are correct - I am no longer working for the NHS I got so sick of being held responsible for the failings of a corrupt and incompetent administration.

 

I could write a book - but I wont - its just depressing.

 

It doesnt pay to challenge these practices - things do not change - you just end up either being hounded out or worse.

 

The bottom line is that with one hand the government is making individual practitioners responsible and accountable, while taking all the resources away from them which would enable them to do the job, with the other.

 

Staff in the NHS are like the crew of the titanc, bailing furiously with seives.

 

the ship is sinking and unfortunately most of them will go down with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Again alex - I would defend to my last breath the right of the individual practitioner his/her right to privacy.

 

They should give you information insofar as it relates directly to you.

 

You also have a right to see your medical records should you require.

 

You should not be able to access information regarding the work. or disciplinary record of a person where the information has no connection with you personally.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shipman was allowed to continue because the monitoring mechanisms that should have been in place failed.

 

This again is something to do with the status that the Medical Profession still holds to itself. and woe betide any other health profession that dares to question a Doctor.

 

As Erica says this is a totally different kettle of fish - and you are, I fear, unhappy because you are not getting the answers that you want.

 

I am sorry if my answers displease you but I know that if personal information about Healthcare Professionals was published in the way that you seem to think you are entitled to - there would be many that would simply stop working in healthcare and those that remained would be persecuted by unhappy and often vindictive complainents.

 

There was a move a couple of years ago to make Nurses home addresses available on the Nursing Register so that you could literaly look up where any registered nurse lived.

 

Had this been passed then I am certain that the number of UK nurses in the profession would have plummeted and the number of attacks on nurses would have spiralled.

 

I dont see why you think that your rights should outweigh anyone elses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are entitled?

What is it exactly that you think you are entitled to?

Are you entitled to know the disciplinary record of the person who butchers the meat in the supermarket you use, or perhaps the driver of the bus you ride( you do entrust your lives to these people also, or not to poison you or crash the bus)

You have the right to make complaints and you have the right to information in the public domain (league tables) you also have the right to see your own notes (or such notes as your doctor deems you can see) and any data particularly relating to you.

However I do not see why any person who chooses to work in healhcare should be required to give up their personal rights.

I am personally sick to death of people who seem to think that just because you are their Nurse/Doctor or carer that they in some way own you.

Pursue your complaint - I urge you, this is the only way that improvements may be made - but in doing so dont trample the rights of the people who work very difficult circumstances.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Healthcare professionals are accountable to a higher standard as they should be - but they are judged by those qualified to do so not just by "bods off the street" which is, with the greatest respect what you are.

 

Just because you have been treated by a particular specialist, you feel you are qualified to judge them? I think not.

You are qualified to give your opinion of a practitioner whom you have seen but that will hardly be a qualified and balanced one - rather one based on a single patients experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you want to know what has happened to other patients then what you need to do is perhaps websearch it and/or post information on a health centered webblog and allow others to tell you their experience.

 

Your g/f doctorate will enable her to give qualified opinion in her field, but as you say not about your experience.

 

I apologise if I appear to be overly defensive here but as a healthcare professional whose rights have been continually abused by the service and who has been physically, verbally and professionally abused by those who I was supposed to be helping any attack on what little privacy we have left is particularly galling to me.

 

All the changes that have come about in the health service have, with much justification, been regarding patients - with no thought to the additional pressure, workload, responsibilities and indignity that the staff would have to suffer to make it work.

 

I personally had had enough and got out. Many with far more dedication than me have stayed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...