Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

VG - Vs Northen Rock - Charging Order


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3206 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I obtained this:

 

Charging Order - an order of a court that a charge be placed on a property so that, when it is sold, the first part of the proceeds of the sale go to pay off an outstanding debt. A charging order effectively turns an unsecured loan into a secured loan. The existance of a charging order is noted on the deeds of the property in question. The Charging Orders Act 1979 allows creditors with a high court judgemnet or county court judgment the ability to secure the debt to assets. A charging order can't be made unless payments have been defaulted on a CCJ.

 

From this thread: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/161658-z-debt-terminology.html

 

I'm confused with this part: A charging order can't be made unless payments have been defaulted on a CCJ.

 

I'm on a DMP with CCCS, I missed one payment with permission from CCCS due to an unexpected high bill, because of that Northern Rock wrote stating that I have defaulted on the agreement with CCCS and they have applied for a CO I suspect they'll go through the CCJ process first, I had court papers come and filled them in.

So, if a CCJ is granted, and I continue to pay via my DMP, will NR be able to obtain a CO saying I’ve defaulted on the ORIGINAL agreement i.e. my official monthly payments, before I got into financial difficulties?

Trust the above makes sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 614
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

When is the court date ?

I've not had a court date, I completed the paperword and forwarded it to CCCS for completion.

Was this a loan or a credit card ? When was it taken out ?

It was a loan, taken out around end of 2006.

Has the bank issued you with default notices ?

Yes, I had one sometime ago.

The more info you give, the more advice you'll get

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

A couple of months ago I received some court papers behalf of one of my creditors, I sent the papers of to CCCS who completed them and offered what I've been paying for the last 12 months.

 

I heard nothing since then until today when I received further court papers saying "Judgement For The Claimant" I was not given an option to attend court and explain my reasons for a DMP, I have another 6 creditors who all seem OK with my DMP arrangement, apart from this one.

 

The creditor has refused the offer from CCCS even though I've been paying them the same amount for the last 12 months, I've phoned the court and they say the creditor is after a charging order, I've forwarded the papers of to CCCS to deal with, although I've no idea what the next step is.

 

Anyone with any advice as this is scaring me to death.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I know it sometimes difficult to get the right advice, but please do not do as CCCS or other DMP companies say, as this is a sure fire way to get a CCJ

I done what I thought was right, I thought if the court had confirmation from CCCS re my I&E they would refuse the claimants application.

 

I doubt it's any good me requesting a CCCA as I only took the debt out in 2006, and I remember chaising them at the time as the loan had not entered my account, they said they were waiting for my credit agreement, which turned up the following day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I think it would be a good idea to give National Debtline a phone for some further support (Tel: 0808 808 4000)

OK, I'll do that later on today.

Have NR applied for an interim charging order yet??

I don't know, some months ago I had a court paper come through from the court which I sent off to CCCS, they completed it and sent it back to the court.

If you wish to defend the interim charging order being made final, objections must be made to the claimant no less than seven days before the hearing. The letter with your arguments must be sent recorded delivery to both creditor and court. ?

OK

A time order is only a valid option if your agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act (which yours is).?

Yes, as I owe over £20.000 and had my loan in 2006.

You can ask the court to consider a time order on its own initiative before making a charging order final. The court will usually look into the position of the creditor as well as your situation when deciding whether a time order is ‘just’. This means the court will look at the reasons you took out the loan, consider how long and how much you have repaid to date, look at how you have attempted to resolve the issue to date and the creditor’s actions. ?

OK

Does anyone else have a beneficial interest in your property?

Yes, my OH, we have a joint mortgage, strange thing is my OH also has a personal loan with NR, NR wrote to CCCS agreeing her DMP offer until 2009 very similiar amout to me (We have a joint DMP) hope that makes sense.

 

Why NR have targeted "Me" and not "Us" I don't understand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just an update, NR refused my monthly offer via my DMP through CCCS.

 

The case in now being transferred through to my local county court for a hearing, no date has yet been set, it was only last week the papers were being transferred.

 

I've been paying NR via my DMP for 12 months now, in view of an imminent court hearing, is it worth my applying for my CCA? (this personal loan is only around 18 months old, so I guess there is a valid CCA somewhere)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello rory

 

I'm not sure if this is going to make sense, but I'll give it ago.

 

As NR have refused my offer of payment, they were granted a "Determination Order" I've appealed against that and now waiting for a hearing, however, I've found out today that when NR were granted the "Determination Order" a CCJ came with it :eek:

 

How can that be?

 

As yet, I've not had the opportunity to defend myself, I'm confused by it all, maybe I don't have the right to defend myself as I ow the money, which I've never denied as I've never missed a payment whilst on my DMP.

 

I spoke with CCCS and I'm informed because I've admitted the debt by offering a monthly payment, the CCJ is automatic.

 

The bottom line, NR are after a CO, I find it amazing that what was an unsecured loan can now be turned into a "Secured loan"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe the CCCS have said that !!

42man, they did say that honestly.

what about disputing it due to excesssive charges

I don't know if I've had any excessive charges.

non production of a valid CCA, etc etc !!

I've not requested a CCA, as this debt is only around 18 months old.

 

(Thanks for your help)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid so, yes

OK, I suffer with a psychotic disability, had I been warned about receiving a CCJ I could have prepared myself psychologically.

Have you applied for a time order?

 

No rory, I looked at your previous link within this thread re time orders, I don't digest / retain information very well, although I did speak to CCCS about a time order, and was informed it's something there not experienced with.

 

I may get critized here, but I am unable to deal with this due to my psychological disability, I relay on CCCS to guide me, and deal with my credotors that being said I don’t want to rock the boat with CCCS as I’m frightened in case they throw me off my DMP.

 

I’m unable to handle stress / anxiety very well, I have informed NR of this, yet they’ve proceeded down this road causing me countless sleepless nights.

 

One other issue that bothers me of my 9 creditors, only NR are taking legal action I’m scared in case the others decide to follow NR.

 

Although I’ve given brief details about my medical issues, I must make it clear I’m not after sympathy or attention.

 

I’ve never been so scared as what I am at the moment in case I lose my home, I’ve never missed a mortgage payment / utility bill / council tax, and yet NR can have this detrimental effect on me for what is after all an unsecured debt.

 

I’m grateful to you all for the advice you’ve given me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you admit the debt in the claim papers e.g. making an offer of payments?

CCCS completed the paperwork, I've never recieved a copy of what was said, but CCCS did make an offer (The same amount they've been paying for the last 12 months)

Or did you state that you would defend?

Since NR refused the offer and were granted a "Determination Order" I've now appealed against the Determination Order and I'm waiting for a hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello rory

 

We have a joint mortgage, should either one of us pass on, the other becomes the sole beneficiary.

 

I believe this is our situation:

Joint tenants is where the property is owned by you both but neither of you own a particular share in the property. In this situation it is just normally assumed that each person owns half the property
Edited by Von Greenbach
Paragraph Added
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Supa

Are the hearings for the Redetermination and Charging Order being held together ?

I don't fully understand what's taking place, I know NR were granted an Determination or something, and it's that what I've appealed against, I'm waiting for a hearing now.

How many other creditors do you have ?

In total we have 10 creditors, this breaks down as

 

2 Overdrafts - so excluded from CCA

 

2 DCAs unable to produce a valid CCA

 

6 Creditors / DCAs which are loans / CC / store card debts.

 

We are paying ALL 10 creditors via CCCS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you received any correspondence from Northern Rock or Land Registry informing you of an application for a Charging Order ?

At this stage no.

 

May I ask another question, NR have been granted a CCJ against me when they were granted the determination, I was not aware of this, however, I'm receiving spam mail from various companies informing me of my CCJ (this is how I became aware I had a CCJ)

 

These companies are offering "Financial Advice" I'm registered with MPS (Mail preference service) to stop junk mail, are these companies allowed to send me mail?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm requesting my CCA on this a/c, do I send my request to NR or Eversheds who are the solicitors acting for NR.

 

Edit: I'm not signing the CCA request, but can I type my nmae or do I actually have to print it?

Edited by Von Greenbach
Paragraph Added
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi VG,

 

The CCA request goes to Eversheds.

 

Just type your name.............there is no need to sign it or actually print it.

 

And send Recorded Delivery.

Yo Supa

 

Ta, do I need to send recorded delivery if I'm including a postal Order?

 

I'm sending 6 CCA requests, recorded delivery could work out quite expensive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alternatively, if you cannot afford to go for Recorded Delivery, you could take your CCA requests to the Post Office counter and ask for a "Certificate of Postage".

 

Any letter posted to a company holding a Consumer credit licence is deemed served (delivered) after 2 days using a 1st Class stamp or after 4 days for 2nd class stamp.

Hey, WoW

 

I've never heard of this before, is it free of charge?

 

What is it exactly, do I just hand over the sealed envelope (6 of them) to the postmaster?

 

Sorry if I sound thick here.

 

I was going to go for a stroll later and put them in the post box, should I go to the post office instead tomorrow?

 

I tried to give you some rep points, but it's told me to be generous with others first!!!!

 

It keeps saying that to me!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know this method is a lot cheaper, and you get proof of postage, however, im pretty sure you dont get proof of delivery.

 

To be honest, the royal mail these days is a joke, the only reliable method with them is Special Delivery, which costs over £4 per item, i only use it for very important docs, the next best thing is recorded signed for, i think about £1.40, which should get there, but its a lottery as to whether you can get confirmation.

 

No you dont tell the postmaster what your letter is about.

Thank you CCM, I nearly called you CCA :D

 

OK, well I've never used this facility before, so just for a test, I'm going to give it ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How up to date are NR with the prescribed terms in a CCA?

 

I've read on here about some companies like EGG for example as one company who are almost 100% perfect with CCA, compared to other companies who seem a little "careless" curious where NR fall.

 

The reason I ask, NR are in the process of taking legal action to try and obtain a CO, I've requested my CCA from Eversheds for this personal loan which is around 18 months / 2 years old.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...